Journal of Chemical Physics
The Journal of Chemical Physics
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Segregation in aqueous methanol enhanced by cooling and compression
Molecular segregation in methanol-water mixtures is studied across a wide concentration range as a function of temperature and pressure. Cluster distributions obtained from both neutron diffraction an...
Next Article
The elastic constants and related properties of beta-HMX determined by Brillouin scattering
By scattering from a variety of acoustic phonons, a complete stiffness tensor has been determined for crystalline -HMX. The results are compared with recent experimental and theoretical determinations...

Role of local structure on motions on the potential energy landscape for a model supercooled polymer

J. Chem. Phys. 122, 174515 (2005); doi:10.1063/1.1888505

Published 5 May 2005

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Tushar S. Jain and Juan J. de Pablo
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
We have conducted detailed Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics simulations of a model glass forming polymeric system near its apparent glass transition temperature. We have characterized the local structure of the glass using a Voronoi–Delaunay analysis of local particle arrangements. After a perturbative face elimination, we find that a significant fraction of Voronoi polyhedra consist of 12 pentagonal faces, a sign of icosahedral ordering. Further, we have identified metabasins of particle vibrations on the potential energy landscape on the basis of persistence of particle positions and neighbors over a simulated trajectory. We find that the residence times for vibrations are correlated with a particular Voronoi volume and number of neighbors of a particle; the largest metabasins correspond to particles whose average Voronoi volume is close to the value expected on the basis of the density, and whose approximate number of neighbors is close to 12. The local distortion around a particle, measured in terms of the tetrahedricity of the Delaunay simplices, reveals that the particles with a higher degree of local distortion are likely to transition faster to a neighboring metabasin. In addition to the transition between metabasins, we have also examined the influence of vibrations at inherent structures (IS) on the local structure, and find that the the low frequency modes at the IS exhibit the greatest curvature with respect to the local structure. We believe that these results establish an important connection between the local structure of glass formers and the activated dynamics, thereby providing insights into the origins of dynamic heterogeneities. ©2005 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 27 August 2004; accepted 16 February 2005; published 5 May 2005
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/122/174515/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$28)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (188 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 61.43.Bn
    Structural modeling of disordered solids including serial-addition models, computer simulation
  • 64.70.Pf
    Glass transitions
  • 61.43.Fs
    Structure of glasses
  • 63.50.+x
    Vibrational states in disordered systems
  • YEAR: 2005

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-9606 (print)   1089-7690 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (62)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. M. H. Cohen and G. S. Grest, Phys. Rev. B 20, 1077 (1979).
  2. T. G. Fox and P. J. Flory, J. Appl. Phys. 21, 581 (1950).
  3. A. K. Doolittle, J. Appl. Phys. 22, 1471 (1951).
  4. R. L. Leheny et al., J. Chem. Phys. 105, 7783 (1996).
  5. F. Varnik, J. Baschnagel, and K. Binder, Eur. Phys. J. E 8, 195 (2002).
  6. M. Ediger, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 51, 99 (2000).
  7. H. Sillescu, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 243, 81 (1999).
  8. C. Donati et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2338 (1998).
  9. A. Widmer-Cooper, P. Harrowell, and H. Fynewever, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 135701 (2004).
  10. S. C. Glotzer, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 274, 342 (2000).
  11. S. Butler and P. Harrowell, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 4454 (1991).
  12. J. P. Garrahan and D. Chandler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 035704 (2002).
  13. L. Berthier and J. P. Garrahan, Phys. Rev. E 68, 041201 (2003).
  14. N. N. Medvedev, A. Geiger, and W. Brostow, J. Chem. Phys. 93, 8337 (1990).
  15. J. C. G. Montoro and J. L. F. Abascal, J. Phys. Chem. 97, 4211 (1993).
  16. Y. Hiwatari and T. Saito, J. Chem. Phys. 81, 6044 (1984).
  17. V. A. Luchnikov, N. N. Medvedev, Y. I. Naberukin, and H. R. Schober, Phys. Rev. B 62, 3181 (2000).
  18. V. P. Voloshin, Y. I. Naberukhin, and N. N. Medvedev, J. Chem. Phys. 102, 4981 (1995).
  19. Y. Hiwatari, J. Chem. Phys. 76, 5502 (1982).
  20. T. Kondo and K. Tsumuraya, J. Chem. Phys. 94, 8220 (1991).
  21. P. J. Steinhardt, D. R. Nelson, and M. Ronchetti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 1297 (1981).
  22. H. Jonsson and H. C. Andersen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2295 (1988).
  23. T. Kondo, K. Tsumuraya, and M. S. Watanabe, J. Chem. Phys. 93, 5182 (1990).
  24. K. L. Ngai and C. M. Roland, Macromolecules 26, 6824 (1993).
  25. C. M. Roland and K. L. Ngai, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 172, 868 (1994).
  26. V. P. Privalko et al., J. Chem. Phys. 112, 5254 (2000).
  27. R. Bohmer, K. L. Ngai, C. A. Angell, and D. J. Plazek, J. Chem. Phys. 99, 4201 (1993).
  28. F. H. Stillinger and T. A. Weber, Phys. Rev. A 28, 2408 (1983).
  29. M. Goldstein, J. Chem. Phys. 51, 3728 (1969).
  30. B. Doliwa and A. Heuer, Phys. Rev. E 67, 031506 (2003).
  31. S. Sastry, P. G. Debenedetti, and F. H. Stillinger, Nature (London) 393, 554 (1998).
  32. T. Schrøder, S. Sastry, J. Dyre, and S. Glotzer, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 9834 (2000).
  33. M. Vogel, B. Doliwa, A. Heuer, and S. C. Glotzer, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 4404 (2004).
  34. T. S. Jain and J. J. de Pablo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 155505 (2004).
  35. C. Donati et al., Phys. Rev. E 60, 3107 (1999).
  36. M. Dzugutov, S. I. Simdyankin, and F. H. M. Zetterling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 195701 (2002).
  37. R. Chelli et al., J. Chem. Phys. 116, 6205 (2002).
  38. N. Giovambattista et al., Phys. Rev. E 65, 051402 (2002).
  39. S. Sastry, P. G. Debenedetti, and F. H. Stillinger, Phys. Rev. E 56, 5533 (1997).
  40. F. Escobedo and J. J. de Pablo, J. Chem. Phys. 102, 2636 (1994).
  41. F. Escobedo and Z. Chen, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 11382 (2000).
  42. S. Mossa et al., Phys. Rev. E 65, 041205 (2002).
  43. W.H. Press, S.A. Teukolsky, W.T. Vetterling, and B.P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes in C (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1988).
  44. W. Brostow, M. Chybicki, R. Laskowski, and J. Rybicki, Phys. Rev. B 57, 13448 (1998).
  45. J. L. Finney and J. Wallace, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 43, 165 (1981).
  46. S. Buchner and A. Heuer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2168 (2000).
  47. A. Heuer and B. Doliwa, Phys. Rev. E 67, 030501 (2003).
  48. R. A. Denny, D. R. Reichman, and J.-P. Bouchaud, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 025503 (2003).
  49. Y. Gebremichael, T. Schrøder, F. Starr, and S. Glotzer, Phys. Rev. E 64, 051503 (2003).
  50. T. S. Jain and J. J. de Pablo, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 9371 (2004).
  51. F. H. Stillinger, J. Chem. Phys. 89, 6461 (1988).
  52. C. Frank, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 215, 43 (1952).
  53. D. Kivelson and G. Tarjus, Philos. Mag. B 77, 245 (1998).
  54. M. Dzugutov, Phys. Rev. A 46, R2984 (1992).
  55. C. Oligschleger and H. R. Schober, Solid State Commun. 93, 1031 (1995).
  56. B. B. Baird and H. R. Schober, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 636 (1991).
  57. L. D. Van Ee, B. J. Thijsse, and J. Sietsma, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 205, 641 (1996).
  58. F. W. Starr, S. Sastry, J. F. Douglas, and S. C. Glotzer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 125501 (2002).
  59. K. L. Ngai, A. Sokolov, and W. Steffen, J. Chem. Phys. 107, 5268 (1998).
  60. K. L. Ngai, Philos. Mag. 84, 1341 (2004).
  61. T. Scopigno, G. Ruocco, F. Sette, and G. Monaco, Science 302, 849 (2003).
  62. A. P. Sokolov et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2405 (1997).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.