Journal of Chemical Physics
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Calorimetric study of phase transitions in a liquid-crystal-based microemulsion
A lyotropic inverse micelle phase composed of water, thermotropic liquid-crystal octylcyanobiphenyl (8CB), and surfactant (DDAB) was studied by using high-resolution calorimetry on several mixtures wi...
Next Article
Morphology changes in the evolution of liquid two-layer films
We consider a thin film consisting of two layers of immiscible liquids on a solid horizontal (heated) substrate. Both the free liquid–liquid and the liquid–gas interface of such a bilayer li...

Inverse density-functional theory as an interpretive tool for measuring colloid-surface interactions in dense systems

J. Chem. Phys. 122, 224710 (2005); doi:10.1063/1.1929734

Published 15 June 2005

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Mingqing Lu, Michael A. Bevan, and David M. Ford
Department of Chemical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-3122
Recent advances in optical microscopy, such as total internal reflection and confocal scanning laser techniques, now permit the direct three-dimensional tracking of large numbers of colloidal particles both near and far from interfaces. A novel application of this technology, currently being developed by one of the authors under the name of diffusing colloidal probe microscopy (DCPM), is to use colloidal particles as probes of the energetic characteristics of a surface. A major theoretical challenge in implementing DCPM is to obtain the potential energy of a single particle in the external field created by the surface, from the measured particle trajectories in a dense colloidal system. In this paper we develop an approach based on an inversion of density-functional theory (DFT), where we calculate the single-particle-surface potential from the experimentally measured equilibrium density profile in a nondilute colloidal fluid. The underlying DFT formulation is based on the recent work of Zhou and Ruckenstein [Zhou and Ruckenstein, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 8079 (2000)]. For model hard-sphere and Lennard-Jones systems, using Monte Carlo simulation to provide the "experimental" density profiles, we found that the inversion procedure reproduces the true particle-surface-potential energy to an accuracy within typical DCPM experimental limitations (~0.1kT) at low to moderate colloidal densities. The choice of DFT closures also significantly affects the accuracy. ©2005 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 28 March 2005; accepted 18 April 2005; published 15 June 2005
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/122/224710/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$24)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (68 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-9606 (print)   1089-7690 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (22)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. H. J. Wu and M. A. Bevan, Langmuir 21, 1244 (2005).
  2. D. C. Prieve, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 82, 93 (1999).
  3. J. C. Crocker and D. G. Grier, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 179, 298 (1996).
  4. A. D. Dinsmore, E. R. Weeks, V. Prasad, A. C. Levitt, and D. A. Weitz, Appl. Opt. 40, 4152 (2001).
  5. Fundamentals of Inhomogeneous Fluids, edited by D. Henderson (Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1992).
  6. S. Q. Zhou and E. Ruckenstein, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 8079 (2000).
  7. M. Calleja, A. N. North, J. G. Powles, and G. Rickayzen, Mol. Phys. 73, 973 (1991);
  8. S. Q. Zhou and E. Ruckenstein, Phys. Rev. E 61, 2704 (2000).
  9. J.-P. Hansen and I.R. McDonald, Theory of Simple Liquids, 2nd ed. (Academic, London, 1996).
  10. N. Choudhury and S. K. Ghosh, J. Chem. Phys. 114, 8530 (2001).
  11. S. Q. Zhou and E. Ruckenstein, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 5242 (2000).
  12. S. Q. Zhou, Phys. Rev. E 63, 051203 (2001).
  13. S. C. Kim and S. H. Suh, J. Chem. Phys. 117, 9880 (2002).
  14. S. Q. Zhou, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 8719 (2000).
  15. S. Q. Zhou, Eur. Phys. J. E 3, 343 (2000);
  16. S. Q. Zhou and X. Q. Zhang, Phys. Rev. E 64, 011112 (2001).
  17. M. A. Bevan, S. N. Petris, and D. Y. C. Chan, Langmuir 18, 7845 (2002);
  18. M. A. Bevan and D. C. Prieve, ibid. 15, 7925 (1999);
    16, 9274 (2000);
    M. A. Bevan and P. J. Scales, ibid. 18, 1474 (2002).
  19. Y. Rosenfeld and G. Kahl, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 9, L89 (1997).
  20. R. Rajagopalan and K. S. Rao, Phys. Rev. E 55, 4423 (1997);
  21. L. Reatto, D. Levesque, and J. J. Weis, Phys. Rev. A 33, 3451 (1986).
  22. M.P. Allen and D.J. Tildesley, Computer Simulation of Liquids (Clarendon, Oxford, 1987).
  23. M. Schmidt, M. Dijkstra, and J. P. Hansen, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16, S4185 (2004).
  24. S. Labik, A. Malijevsky, and P. Vonka, Mol. Phys. 56, 709 (1985).
  25. R. D. Groot, N. M. Faber, and J. P. Vandereerden, Mol. Phys. 62, 861 (1987);
  26. S. Sokolowski and J. Fischer, ibid. 68, 647 (1989).
  27. M. Llanorestrepo and W. G. Chapman, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 5139 (1994).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.