Journal of Chemical Physics
Feedback | Help | Exit
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Orbital-dependent correlation energy in density-functional theory based on a second-order perturbation approach: Success and failure
We have developed a second-order perturbation theory (PT) energy functional within density-functional theory (DFT). Based on PT with the Kohn–Sham (KS) determinant as a reference, this new ab ini...
Next Article
Time-dependent density functional theory: Past, present, and future
Time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) is presently enjoying enormous popularity in quantum chemistry, as a useful tool for extracting electronic excited state energies. This article discuss...

Ab initio density functional theory: The best of both worlds?

J. Chem. Phys. 123, 062205 (2005); doi:10.1063/1.1904585

Published 17 August 2005

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Rodney J. Bartlett, Victor F. Lotrich, and Igor V. Schweigert
Quantum Theory Project, Departments of Chemistry and Physics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611
Density functional theory (DFT), in its current local, gradient corrected, and hybrid implementations and their extensions, is approaching an impasse. To continue to progress toward the quality of results demanded by today's ab initio quantum chemistry encourages a new direction. We believe ab initio DFT is a promising route to pursue. Whereas conventional DFT cannot describe weak interactions, photoelectron spectra, or many potential energy surfaces, ab initio DFT, even in its initial, optimized effective potential, second-order many-body perturbation theory form [OEP (2)-semi canonical], is shown to do all well. In fact, we obtain accuracy that frequently exceeds MP2, being competitive with coupled-cluster theory in some cases. Furthermore, this is accomplished within a relatively fast computational procedure that scales like iterative second order. We illustrate our results with several molecular examples including Ne2,Be2,F2, and benzene. ©2005 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 4 June 2004; accepted 17 March 2005; published 17 August 2005
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/123/062205/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$24)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (294 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 31.15.Ar
    Ab initio calculations (atoms and molecules)
  • 31.15.Ew
    Density-functional theory (atoms and molecules)
  • 31.15.Md
    Perturbation theory (atoms and molecules)
  • 31.15.Dv
    Coupled cluster theory (atoms and molecules)
  • YEAR: 2005

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-9606 (print)   1089-7690 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (52)
View in Separate Window/Tab
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. 136, B864 (1964).
  2. R.G. Parr and W. Yang, Density-Functional Theory of Atoms and Molecules (Oxford Science Publications, Oxford, 1989).
  3. W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 (1965).
  4. M. Levy and A. Gorling, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 56, 385 (1995).
  5. R. J. Bartlett, I. Grabowski, S. Ivanov, and S. Hirata, J. Chem. Phys. 122, 034104 (2005).
  6. M. Levy, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76, 6062 (1979).
  7. E. Runge and E. K. U. Gross, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 997 (1984).
  8. N. C. Handy, M. T. Marron, and H. J. Silverstone, Phys. Rev. 180, 45 (1969).
  9. S. H. Vosko, L. Wilk, and M. Nusair, Can. J. Phys. 55, 1200 (1980).
  10. S. K. Ma and K. A. Brueckner, Phys. Rev. 165, 18 (1968).
  11. J. P. Perdew, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1665 (1985).
  12. R. Cole and O. Salvetti, Theor. Chim. Acta 37, 329 (1975).
  13. C. Lee, W. Yang, and R. G. Parr, Phys. Rev. B 37, 785 (1988).
  14. A. D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 84, 4524 (1986).
  15. J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).
  16. A. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 5648 (1993).
  17. F. A. Hamprecht, A. J. Cohen, D. J. Tozer, and N. C. Handy, J. Chem. Phys. 109, 6264 (1998).
  18. T. van Voorhis and G. E. Scuseria, J. Chem. Phys. 109, 400 (1998).
  19. J. Perdew, S. Kurth, A. Zupan, and P. Blaha, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2544 (1999).
  20. J. M. Tao, J. P. Perdew, V. N. Staroverov, and G. E. Scuseria, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 146401 (2003).
  21. R. J. Bartlett and G. D. Purvis III, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 14, 561 (1978).
  22. R.J. Bartlett, in Coupled-Cluster Theory: An Overview of Recent Developments, edited by David R. Yarkony, Modern Electronic Structure Theory, Part II (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995), pp. 1047–1131.
  23. K. Raghavachari, G. W. Trucks, J. A. Pople, and M. Head-Gordon, Chem. Phys. Lett. 157, 479 (1989).
  24. S. A. Kucharski and R. J. Bartlett, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 9221 (1998).
  25. S. A. Kucharski and R. J. Bartlett, J. Chem. Phys. 97, 4282 (1992).
  26. J. Stanton and R. J. Bartlett, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 7029 (1993).
  27. M. Musial amd R. J. Bartlett, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 1128 (2003).
  28. R. J. Bartlett, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 3, 579 (2002).
  29. J. D. Talman and W. F. Shadwick, Phys. Rev. A 14, 36 (1976).
  30. S. Hirata, S. Ivanov, I. Grabowski, R. J. Bartlett, K. Burke, and J. D. Talman, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 1635 (2001).
  31. J. B. Krieger, Y. Li, and G. I. Iafrate, Phys. Rev. A 45, 101 (1992)
    32. 46, 5453 (1992).
  32. S. Ivanov, S. Hirata, and R. J. Bartlett, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 5455 (1999).
  33. A. Gorling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 5459 (1999).
  34. I. Grabowski, S. Hirata, S. Ivanov, and R. J. Bartlett, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 4415 (2002).
  35. Q. Zhao, R. C. Morrison, and R. G. Parr, Phys. Rev. A 50, 2138 (1994).
  36. V. Lotrich, I. Schweigert, and R.J. Bartlett (unpublished).
  37. A. Facco Bonetti, E. Engel, R. N. Schmid, and R. M. Dreizler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2241 (2001).
  38. Y. M. Niquet, M. Fuchs, and X. Gonze, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 219301 (2003).
  39. A. F. Bonnetti, E. Engel, R. N. Schmid, and R. M. Dreizler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 219302 (2003).
  40. C. Filippi, C. J. Umrigar, and X. Gonze, Phys. Rev. A 54, 4810 (1996).
  41. C. J. Umrigar and X. Gonze, Phys. Rev. A 50, 3827 (1994).
  42. O. V. Gritsenko, B. Braida, and E. J. Baerends, J. Chem. Phys. 119, 1937 (2003).
  43. D. P. Chong, O. V. Gritsenko, and E. J. Baerends, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 1760 (2002).
  44. S. Hirata, S. Ivanov, I. Grabowski, and R. J. Bartlett, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 6468 (2002).
  45. I. Schweigert, V. Lotrich, and R.J. Bartlett (unpublished).
  46. A. Dreuw, J. L. Weisman, and M. Head-Gordon, J. Chem. Phys. 119, 2943 (2003).
  47. D. Bokhan, I. Schweigert, and R.J. Bartlett, Mol. Phys. (in press).
  48. V. Lotrich, R. J. Bartlett, and I. Grabowski Chem. Phys. Lett. 405, 43 (2005).
  49. R. J. Gdanitz, Chem. Phys. Lett. 312, 578 (1999).
  50. A. Gorling and M. Levy, Phys. Rev. B 47, 13105 (1993).
  51. X. Wu, M. C. Vargas, S. Nayak, V. Lotrich, and G. Scoles, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 8748 (2001).
  52. T. Henderson and R. J. Bartlett, Phys. Rev. A 70, 022512 (2004).

CITING ARTICLES
For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.


Copyright © American Institute of Physics