Journal of Chemical Physics
Feedback | Help | Exit
The Journal of Chemical Physics
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
On the connectivity of seams of conical intersection: Seam curvature
The seam of conical intersection of two electronic states is said to be curved when the span of the basis vectors describing the branching plane varies along the seam. In this work degenerate perturba...
Next Article
The electrostatic potential generated by topological atoms. II. Inverse multipole moments
Quantum chemical topology defines finite atoms, whose bounded electron density generates a well-defined electrostatic potential. A multipole expansion based on spherical tensors provides a potential t...

Stochastic transition states: Reaction geometry amidst noise

J. Chem. Phys. 123, 204102 (2005); doi:10.1063/1.2109827

Published 18 November 2005

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Thomas Bartsch and T. Uzer
Center for Nonlinear Science and School of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0430

Rigoberto Hernandez
Center for Nonlinear Science and School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0300
Classical transition state theory (TST) is the cornerstone of reaction-rate theory. It postulates a partition of phase space into reactant and product regions, which are separated by a dividing surface that reactive trajectories must cross. In order not to overestimate the reaction rate, the dynamics must be free of recrossings of the dividing surface. This no-recrossing rule is difficult (and sometimes impossible) to enforce, however, when a chemical reaction takes place in a fluctuating environment such as a liquid. High-accuracy approximations to the rate are well known when the solvent forces are treated using stochastic representations, though again, exact no-recrossing surfaces have not been available. To generalize the exact limit of TST to reactive systems driven by noise, we introduce a time-dependent dividing surface that is stochastically moving in phase space, such that it is crossed once and only once by each transition path. ©2005 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 7 July 2005; accepted 14 September 2005; published 18 November 2005
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/123/204102/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$28)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (470 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 82.20.Db
    Transition state theory and statistical theories of rate constants (chemical kinetics)
  • 82.20.Hf
    Product distribution in chemical kinetics
  • 82.20.Uv
    Stochastic theories of rate constants in chemical kinetics
  • 82.20.Nk
    Classical theories of reactions and/or energy transfer in chemical kinetics
  • 82.30.-b
    Specific chemical reactions; reaction mechanisms
  • YEAR: 2005

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-9606 (print)   1089-7690 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (52)
View in Separate Window/Tab
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. W. H. Miller, Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. 110, 1 (1998).
  2. D. G. Truhlar, B. C. Garrett, and S. J. Klippenstein, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 12771 (1996).
  3. C. Jaffé, S. Kawai, J. Palacián, P. Yanguas, and T. Uzer, Adv. Chem. Phys. 130A, 171 (2005).
  4. E. P. Wigner, J. Chem. Phys. 7, 646 (1939).
  5. E. P. Wigner, Trans. Faraday Soc. 34, 29 (1938).
  6. H. Eyring, J. Chem. Phys. 3, 107 (1935).
  7. J. C. Keck, Adv. Chem. Phys. 13, 85 (1967).
  8. M.L. Goldberger and K.M. Watson, Collision Theory (Wiley, New York, 1964).
  9. Theory of Chemical Reaction Dynamics, edited by M. Baer (CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 1985), Vols. 1–4.
  10. W. H. Miller, Acc. Chem. Res. 26, 174 (1993).
  11. P. Pechukas and F. J. Lafferty, J. Chem. Phys. 58, 1622 (1973).
  12. D. G. Truhlar and B. C. Garrett, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 35, 159 (1984).
  13. E. Pollak, in Theory of Chemical Reaction Dynamics, edited by M. Baer (CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 1985), Vol. 3.
  14. P. Pechukas and E. Pollak, J. Chem. Phys. 71, 2062 (1979).
  15. T. Komatsuzaki and R. S. Berry, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 9160 (1999).
  16. S. Wiggins, L. Wiesenfeld, C. Jaffé, and T. Uzer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5478 (2001).
  17. T. Uzer, C. Jaffé, J. Palacian, P. Yanguas, and S. Wiggins, Nonlinearity 15, 957 (2002).
  18. J. T. Hynes, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 36, 573 (1985).
  19. E. Pollak and P. Talkner, Chaos 15, 026116 (2005).
  20. B. J. Berne, M. Borkovec, and J. E. Straub, J. Phys. Chem. 92, 3711 (1988).
  21. E. Pollak, in Dynamics of Molecules and Chemical Reactions, edited by R. E. Wyatt and J. Zhang (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1996), pp. 617–669.
  22. E. Pollak, J. Chem. Phys. 93, 1116 (1990).
  23. E. Pollak, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 8877 (1992).
  24. S. C. Tucker and E. Pollak, J. Stat. Phys. 66, 975 (1992).
  25. S.C. Tucker, in New Trends in Kramers' Reaction Rate Theory, edited by P. Hänggi and P. Talkner (Kluwer, The Netherlands, 1995), pp. 5–46.
  26. C. Dellago, P. Bolhuis, F. S. Csajka, and D. Chandler, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 1964 (1998).
  27. C. P. Dellago, P. Bolhuis, and D. Chandler, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 6617 (1999).
  28. P. G. Bolhuis, C. P. Dellago, and D. Chandler, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 5877 (2000).
  29. P. G. Bolhuis, D. Chandler, C. Dellago, and P. Geissler, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 53, 291 (2002).
  30. C. Dellago, P. G. Bolhuis, and P. Geissler, Adv. Chem. Phys. 123, 1 (2002).
  31. T. Bartsch, R. Hernandez, and T. Uzer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 058301 (2005).
  32. E. Pollak, J. Chem. Phys. 85, 865 (1986).
  33. R. Zwanzig, J. Stat. Phys. 9, 215 (1973).
  34. A. O. Caldeira and A. J. Leggett, Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 211 (1981);
    35. Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 149, 374 (1983).
  35. E. Pollak, H. Grabert, and P. Hänggi, J. Chem. Phys. 91, 4073 (1989).
  36. R. Graham, J. Stat. Phys. 60, 675 (1990).
  37. C. C. Martens, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 2516 (2002).
  38. R. Zwanzig, Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics (Oxford University Press, London, 2001).
  39. P. Hänggi, P. Talkner, and M. Borkovec, Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 251 (1990), and references therein.
  40. H. A. Kramers, Physica (Utrecht) 7, 284 (1940).
  41. R. Zwanzig, Phys. Rev. 124, 983 (1961).
  42. R. Zwanzig, in Lectures in Theoretical Physics (Boulder), edited by W. E. Brittin, B. W. Downs, and J. Downs (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1961), Vol. 3, pp. 106–141.
  43. J. Prigogine and P. Resibois, Physica (Amsterdam) 27, 629 (1961).
  44. H. Mori, Prog. Theor. Phys. 33, 423 (1965).
  45. R. F. Fox, Phys. Rep. 48, 180 (1978).
  46. C. Jaffé, D. Farrelly, and T. Uzer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 610 (2000);
    47. Phys. Rev. A 60, 3833 (1999).
  47. G. W. Ford, M. Kac, and P. Mazur, J. Math. Phys. 6, 504 (1965).
  48. R. Kubo, Rep. Prog. Phys. 29, 255 (1966).
  49. L. Arnold, Random Dynamical Systems (Springer, Berlin, 1998).
  50. M. Abramowitz and I.A. Stegun, Pocketbook of Mathematical Functions (Verlag Harri Deutsch, Frankfurt/Main, 1984).
  51. R. F. Grote and J. T. Hynes, J. Chem. Phys. 73, 2715 (1980).
  52. D.V. Widder, The Laplace Transform (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1946).

CITING ARTICLES
For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.


Copyright © American Institute of Physics