Journal of Chemical Physics
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Pair formation and global ordering of strongly interacting ferrocolloid mixtures: An integral equation study
Using the reference hypernetted chain (RHNC) integral equation theory and an accompanying stability analysis we investigate the structural and phase behaviors of model bidisperse ferrocolloids based o...
Next Article
Electro-osmosis at inhomogeneous charged surfaces: Hydrodynamic versus electric friction
Electrokinetic methods are efficient in probing the electrostatic surface properties of charged systems. However, anomalies observed in experiments indicate that the classical electrokinetic theory sh...

A theoretical study of molecular conduction. III. A nonequilibrium-Green's-function-based Hartree-Fock approach

J. Chem. Phys. 124, 114708 (2006); doi:10.1063/1.2177652

Published 20 March 2006

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Tomomi Shimazaki
Department of Chemical System Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan

Yongqiang Xue
Department of Chemistry, Northwestern University, Evanston, Ilinois 60208 and College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering, University at Albany, 255 Fuller Road, Albany, New York 12203

Mark A. Ratner
Department of Chemistry, Northwestern University, Evanston, Ilinois 60208

Koichi Yamashita
Department of Chemical System Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan
Many recent experimental and theoretical studies have paid attention to the conductivity of single molecule transport junctions, both because it is fundamentally important and because of its significance in the development of molecular-based electronics. In this paper, we discuss a nonequilibrium Green's function (NEGF)-based Hartree-Fock (HF) approach; the NEGF method can appropriately accommodate charge distributions in molecules connected to electrodes. In addition, we show that a NEGF-based density matrix can reduce to an ordinary HF density matrix for an isolated molecule if the molecule does not interact with electrodes. This feature of the NEGF-based density matrix also means that NEGF-based Mulliken charges can be reduced to ordinary Mulliken charges in those cases. Therefore, the NEGF-based HF approach can directly compare molecules that are connected to electrodes with isolated ones, and is useful in investigating complicated features of molecular conduction. We also calculated the transmission probability and conduction for benzenedithiol under finite electrode biases. The coupling between the electrodes and molecule causes electron transfer from the molecule to the electrodes, and the applied bias modifies this electron transfer. In addition, we found that the molecule responds capacitively to the applied bias, by shifting the molecular orbital energies. ©2006 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 6 September 2005; accepted 24 January 2006; published 20 March 2006
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/124/114708/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$24)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (560 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 72.20.Fr
    Low-field transport and mobility; piezoresistance (semiconductors/insulators)
  • 71.15.Ap
    Basis sets (LCAO, plane-wave, APW, etc.) and related methodology (scattering methods, ASA, linearized methods, etc.) (condensed matter electronic structure)
  • 82.45.-h
    Electrochemistry and electrophoresis
  • YEAR: 2006

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-9606 (print)   1089-7690 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (48)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. M. Dorogi, J. Gomez, R. Osifchin, R. P. Andress, and R. Reifenberger, Phys. Rev. B 52, 9071 (1995).
  2. L. A. Bumm, J. J. Arnold, M. T. Cygan, T. D. Dunbar, T. P. Burgin II, D. L. Allara, J. M. Tour, and P. S. Weiss, Science 271, 1705 (1996).
  3. M. A. Reed, C. Zhou, C. J. Muller, T. P. Burgin, and J. M. Tour, Science 278, 252 (1997).
  4. J. Chen, M. A. Reed, A. M. Rawlett, and J. M. Tour, Science 286, 1550 (1999).
  5. J. K. Gimzewski and C. Joachim, Science 283, 1683 (1999).
  6. X. D. Cui, A. Primak, X. Zarate, J. Tomfohr, O. F. Sankey, A. L. Moore, T. A. Moore, D. Gust, G. Harris, and S. M. Lindsay, Science 294, 571 (2001).
  7. J. G. Kushmerick, D. B. Holt, J. C. Yang, J. Naciri, M. H. Moore, and R. Shashidhar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 086802 (2002).
  8. J. Reichert, R. Ochs, D. Beckmann, H. B. Weber, M. Mayor, and H. V. Leohneysen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 176804 (2002).
  9. C. P. Collier, E. W. Wong, M. Belohradsky, F. M. Raymo, J. F. Stoddart, P. J. Kuekes, R. S. Williams, and J. R. Heath, Science 285, 391 (1999).
  10. C. P. Collier, G. Mattersteig, E. W. Wong, Y. Luo, K. Beverly, J. Sampaio, F. M. Raymo, J. F. Stoddart, and J. R. Heath, Science 289, 1172 (2002).
  11. T. Rueckes, K. Kim, E. Joselevich, G. Y. Tseng, C.-L. Cheung, and C. M. Lieber, Science 289, 94 (2000).
  12. C. Zhou, J. Kong, E. Yenilmez, and H. Dai, Science 290, 1552 (2000).
  13. Z. J. Donhauser, B. A. Mantooth, K. F. Kelly, L. A. Bumm, J. D. Monnell, J. J. Stapleton, Jr., A. M. Rawlett, D. L. Allara, J. M. Tour, and P. S. Weiss, Science 292, 2303 (2001).
  14. M. A. Reed, J. Chen, A. M. Rawlett, D. W. Price, and J. M. Tour, Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 3735 (2001).
  15. C. Li, D. Zhang, X. Liu et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 645 (2003).
  16. S. Datta, Electron Transport in Mesoscopic System (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995).
  17. S. Datta, W. Tian, S. Hong, R. Reifenberger, J. I. Henderson, and C. P. Kubiak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2530 (1997).
  18. D. K. Ferry and S. M. Goodnick, Transport in Nanostructures (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997).
  19. A. Nitzan and M. A. Ratner, Science 300, 1384 (2003).
  20. T. Shimazaki and K. Yamashita, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 106, 803 (2006).
  21. T. Shimazaki, H. Maruyama, Y. Asai, and K. Yamashita, J. Chem. Phys. 123, 164111 (2005).
  22. F. Guinea, C. Tejedor, and F. Flores, Phys. Rev. B 28, 4397 (1983).
  23. M. P. Lopez-Sancho, J. M. Lopez-Sancho, and J. Ribio, J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. 14, 1205 (1984).
  24. M. P. Lopez-Sancho, J. M. Lopez-Sancho, and J. Ribio, J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. 15, 851 (1985).
  25. S. Sanvito, C. J. Lambert, J. H. Jefferson, and A. M. Bratkovsky, Phys. Rev. B 59, 11936 (1999).
  26. P. S. Krstic, X.-G. Zhang, and W. H. Butler, Phys. Rev. B 66, 205319 (2002).
  27. W. Tian, S. Datta, J. I. Henderson, and C. P. Kubiak, J. Chem. Phys. 109, 2874 (1998).
  28. P. S. Damle, A. W. Ghosh, and S. Datta, Phys. Rev. B 64, 201403 (2001).
  29. B. Larade, J. Taylor, H. Mehrez, and H. Guo, Phys. Rev. B 64, 075420 (2001).
  30. J. Taylor, H. Guo, and J. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 63, 121104(R) (2001).
  31. J. Taylor, H. Guo, and J. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 63, 245407 (2001).
  32. M. Brandbyge, J.-L. Mozos, P. Ordejon, J. Taylor, and K. Stokbro, Phys. Rev. B 65, 165401 (2002).
  33. P. Damle, A. W. Ghosh, and S. Datta, Chem. Phys. 281, 171 (2002).
  34. Y. Xue, S. Datta, and M. A. Ratner, Chem. Phys. 281, 151 (2002).
  35. Y. Xue and M. A. Ratner, Phys. Rev. B 68, 115406 (2003).
  36. P. Havu, V. Havu, M. J. Puska, and R. M. Nieminen, Phys. Rev. B 69, 115325 (2004).
  37. W. C. J. Bauschlicher, A. Ricca, Y. Xue, and M. A. Ratner, Chem. Phys. Lett. 390, 246 (2004).
  38. M. Galperin and A. Nitzan, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1006, 48 (2003).
  39. V. Mujica, M. Kemp, A. Roitberg, and M. Ratner, J. Chem. Phys. 104, 7296 (1996).
  40. P. Delaney and J. C. Greer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 036805 (2004).
  41. R. Landauer, IBM J. Res. Dev. 1, 223 (1957).
  42. R. Landauer, Phys. Lett. 85A, 91 (1981).
  43. L. P. Kadanoff and G. Baym, Quantum Statical Mechanics (W. A. Benjamin, Inc., New York, 1962).
  44. H. Haug and A.-P. Jauho, Quantum Kinetics in Transport and Optics of Semiconductors (Springer, New York, 1996).
  45. G. D. Mahan, Many-Particle Physics, 3rd ed. (Kluwer Academic, New York/Plenum, New York, 2000).
  46. P. M. Morse and H. Feshbach, Methods of Theoretical Physics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1953).
  47. W. V. Haeringen, B. Farid, and D. Lenstra, Phys. Scr., T T19, 282 (1987).
  48. P. Pulay, J. Comput. Chem. 3, 556 (1982).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.