Journal of Chemical Physics
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Resonantly enhanced multiphoton ionization and zero kinetic energy photoelectron spectroscopy of 2-indanol conformers
We report studies of a supersonically cooled 2-indanol using two-color resonantly enhanced multiphoton ionization (REMPI) and two-color zero kinetic energy (ZEKE) photoelectron spectroscopy. In the RE...
Next Article
Experimental long range potential of the B  1Pi state in NaRb
The long range potential of the B  1 state in NaRb has been investigated by observation of rovibrational levels that it supports, including the high lying ones, with the technique of polariz...

An exploration of electronic structure and nuclear dynamics in tropolone. I. The X-tilde   1A1 ground state

J. Chem. Phys. 124, 204307 (2006); doi:10.1063/1.2200343

Published 23 May 2006

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Lori A. Burns, Daniel Murdock, and Patrick H. Vaccaro
Department of Chemistry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8107
The ground electronic state (X-tilde   1A1) of tropolone has been examined theoretically by exploiting extensive sets of basis functions [e.g., 6-311++G(d,p) and aug-cc-pVDZ] in conjunction with the high levels of electron correlation made possible by density functional (DFT/B3LYP), Møller-Plesset perturbation (MP2), and coupled-cluster [CCSD and CCSD(T)] methods. Unconstrained MP2 and CCSD optimization procedures performed with the reference 6-311++G(d,p) basis predict a slightly nonplanar equilibrium structure characterized by a small barrier to skeletal inversion (<=10  cm–1 magnitude). Complementary harmonic frequency analyses have shown this nonplanarity to be a computational artifact arising from adversely tuned carbon d-orbital exponents embodied in the standard definitions of several Pople-type basis sets. Correlation-consistent bases such as Dunning's aug-cc-pVDZ are less susceptible to these effects and were employed to confirm that the X-tilde   1A1 hypersurface supports a rigorously planar global minimum. The fully optimized geometries and vibrational force fields obtained by applying potent coupled-cluster schemes to the relaxed-equilibrium (Cs) and transition-state (C2v) conformers of tropolone afford a trenchant glimpse of the key features that mediate intramolecular hydron exchange in this model system. By incorporating perturbative triples corrections at the substantial CCSD(T) level of theory, an interoxygen distance of rO[centered ellipsis]O=2.528  Å was determined for the minimum-energy configuration, with the accompanying proton-transfer reaction being hindered by a barrier of 2557.0  cm–1 height. The potential energy landscape in tropolone, as well as the nature of the attendant hydron migration process, is discussed within the framework of the encompassing G4 molecular symmetry group. ©2006 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 10 February 2006; accepted 4 April 2006; published 23 May 2006
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/124/204307/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$24)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (777 kB) View Cart

EPAPS

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 31.15.Ew
    Density-functional theory (atoms and molecules)
  • 31.15.Md
    Perturbation theory (atoms and molecules)
  • 31.15.Dv
    Coupled cluster theory (atoms and molecules)
  • 33.20.Tp
    Vibrational analysis (molecular spectra)
  • 31.25.Eb
    Electron-correlation calculations for atoms and ions: ground state
  • 33.15.Bh
    General molecular conformation and symmetry; stereochemistry
  • YEAR: 2006

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-9606 (print)   1089-7690 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (73)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. C. B. Aakeröy and K. R. Seddon, Chem. Soc. Rev. 22, 397 (1993).
  2. L. G. Arnaut and S. J. Formosinho, J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 75, 1 (1993);
  3. J. Emsley, Struct. Bonding (Berlin) 57, 147 (1984);
  4. S. J. Formosinho and L. G. Arnaut, J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 75, 21 (1993);
  5. F. Hibbert, Advances in Physical Organic Chemistry (Academic, New York, 1986), Vol. 22, p. 113;
  6. F. Hibbert and J. Emsley, Advances in Physical Organic Chemistry (Academic, New York, 1990), Vol. 26, p. 255.
  7. W. W. Cleland, Biochemistry 31, 317 (1992);
  8. W. W. Cleland and M. M. Kreevoy, Science 264, 1887 (1994);
  9. S. Cukierman, Front. Biosci. 8, S1118 (2003);
  10. D. Devault, Q. Rev. Biophys. 13, 387 (1980);
  11. M. Gutman and E. Nachliel, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1015, 391 (1990);
  12. A. J. Kresge, Acc. Chem. Res. 8, 354 (1975);
  13. J. K. Lanyi, J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 24, 169 (1992);
  14. P. Löwdin, Rev. Mod. Phys. 35, 724 (1963);
  15. M. Y. Okamura and G. Feher, Annu. Rev. Biochem. 61, 861 (1992).
  16. A. U. Khan and M. Kasha, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 80, 1767 (1983);
  17. T. P. Smith, K. A. Zaklika, K. Thakur, G. C. Walker, K. Tominaga, and P. F. Barbara, J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 65, 165 (1992).
  18. S. Bratoz, Adv. Quantum Chem. 3, 209 (1967);
  19. P. A. Kollman and L. C. Allen, Chem. Rev. (Washington, D.C.) 72, 283 (1972);
  20. G. C. Pimentel and A. L. McClellan, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 22, 347 (1971);
  21. S. Scheiner, Hydrogen Bonding—A Theoretical Perspective (Oxford University Press, New York, 1997).
  22. Y.-T. Chang, Y. Yamaguchi, W. H. Miller, and H. F. Schaefer III, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 109, 7245 (1987);
  23. C. S. Tautermann, M. J. Loferer, A. F. Voegele, and K. R. Liedl, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 11650 (2004);
  24. Z. Smedarchina, A. Fernandez-Ramos, and W. Siebrand, Chem. Phys. Lett. 395, 339 (2004).
  25. B. S. Jursic, J. Mol. Struct.: THEOCHEM 417, 89 (1997).
  26. V. Barone and C. Adamo, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 11007 (1996);
  27. M. Ben-Nun and T. J. Martínez, J. Phys. Chem. A 103, 6055 (1999);
    T. Carrington, Jr. and W. H. Miller, J. Chem. Phys. 84, 4364 (1986);
    K. Luth and S. Scheiner, J. Phys. Chem. 98, 3582 (1994);
    C. S. Tautermann, A. F. Voegele, T. Loerting, and K. R. Liedl, J. Chem. Phys. 117, 1962 (2002).
  28. Y. Guo, T. D. Sewell, and D. L. Thompson, J. Phys. Chem. A 102, 5040 (1998);
  29. H. Nakai and K. Sodeyama, J. Mol. Struct.: THEOCHEM 637, 27 (2003);
    J. J. Paz, M. Moreno, and J. M. Lluch, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 353 (1995).
  30. Z. Smedarchina, W. Siebrand, and M. Z. Zgierski, J. Chem. Phys. 104, 1203 (1996).
  31. S. Takada and H. Nakamura, J. Chem. Phys. 102, 3977 (1995).
  32. M. V. Vener, S. Scheiner, and N. D. Sokolov, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 9755 (1994).
  33. R. K. Frost, F. C. Hagemeister, C. A. Arrington, T. S. Zwier, and K. D. Jordan, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 2595 (1996).
  34. O. Mó, M. Yáñez, M. Esseffar, M. Herreros, R. Notario, and J. L.-M. Abboud, J. Org. Chem. 62, 3200 (1997).
  35. Y. Nishimura, T. Tsuji, and H. Sekiya, J. Phys. Chem. A 105, 7273 (2001);
  36. K. B. Wiberg, J. Ochterski, and A. Streitwieser, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 8291 (1996).
  37. H. Rostkowska, L. Lapinski, and M. Nowak, and L. Adamowicz, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 90, 1163 (2002).
  38. J. J. Nash, T. S. Zwier, and K. D. Jordan, J. Chem. Phys. 102, 5260 (1995).
  39. R. L. Redington, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 2319 (2000).
  40. R. L. Redington, J. Phys. Chem. A 110, 1600 (2006).
  41. R. L. Redington and C. W. Bock, J. Phys. Chem. 95, 10284 (1991).
  42. N. Sanna, F. Ramondo, and L. Bencivenni, J. Mol. Struct. 318, 217 (1994).
  43. The term "hydron" is meant to imply H+ regardless of isotopic form whereas the word "proton" refers specifically to <sub>1</sub><sup>1</sup>H+.
  44. J. Ireta, J. Neugebauer, and M. Scheffler, J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 5692 (2004);
  45. S. Tsuzuki and H. P. Lüthi, J. Chem. Phys. 114, 3949 (2001);
    W. Koch and M. C. Holthausen, A Chemist's Guide to Density Functional Theory (Wiley-VCH, GmbH, 2001), p. 217.
  46. M. L. Leininger, W. D. Allen, H. F. Schaefer III, and C. D. Sherrill, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 9213 (2000).
  47. J. Olsen, O. Christiansen, H. Koch, and P. Jørgensen, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 5082 (1996);
  48. R. J. Bartlett and G. D. Purvis, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 14, 561 (1978).
  49. R. J. Bartlett, in Modern Electronic Structure Theory, edited by D. R. Yarkony (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995), p. 1047;
  50. T. D. Crawford and H. F. Schaefer, in Reviews in Computational Chemistry, edited by K. B. Lipkowitz and D. B. Boyd (VCH, New York, 2000), p. 33;
    T. J. Lee and G. E. Scuseria, in Quantum Mechanical Electronic Structure Calculations with Chemical Accuracy, edited by S. R. Langhoff (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1995), p. 47.
  51. R. L. Redington and R. L. Sams, J. Phys. Chem. A 106, 7494 (2002).
  52. R. L. Redington and R. L. Sams, Chem. Phys. 283, 135 (2002).
  53. R. L. Redington, T. E. Redington, and J. M. Montgomery, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 2304 (2000).
  54. R. L. Redington and T. E. Redington, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 78, 229 (1979).
  55. K. Tanaka, H. Honjo, T. Tanaka, H. Kohguchi, Y. Ohshima, and Y. Endo, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 1969 (1999).
  56. A. C. P. Alves and J. M. Hollas, Mol. Phys. 23, 927 (1972).
  57. P. R. Bunker and P. Jensen, Molecular Symmetry and Spectroscopy, 2nd ed. (NRC Research Press, Ottawa, 1998).
  58. R. L. Redington, J. Chem. Phys. 92, 6447 (1990).
  59. A. E. Bracamonte and P. H. Vaccaro, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 4658 (2004).
  60. H. Ozeki, M. Takahashi, K. Okuyama, and K. Kimura, J. Chem. Phys. 99, 56 (1993).
  61. R. L. Redington, Y. Chen, G. J. Scherer, and R. W. Field, J. Chem. Phys. 88, 627 (1988).
  62. Y. Tomioka, M. Ito, and N. Mikami, J. Phys. Chem. 87, 4401 (1983).
  63. H. Sekiya, Y. Nagashima, and Y. Nishimura, J. Chem. Phys. 92, 5761 (1990).
  64. In keeping with the vibrational analyses performed during the present work (cf. Table V), nu25(b1) and nu26(b1) would be designated as nu38(b1) and nu39(a2), while nu13(a1) and nu14(a1) would be relabeled as nu33(a1) and nu35(b2).
  65. A. C. P. Alves, J. M. Hollas, H. Musa, and T. Ridley, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 109, 99 (1985).
  66. J. C. Keske, W. Lin, W. C. Pringle, S. E. Novick, T. A. Blake, and D. F. Plusquellic, J. Chem. Phys. 124, 074309 (2006).
  67. K. Giese and O. Kühn, J. Chem. Phys. 123, 054315 (2005).
  68. A. E. Bracamonte and P. H. Vaccaro, J. Chem. Phys. 119, 887 (2003).
  69. M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel et al., GAUSSIAN 03, Revision C.02 (Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford, CT, 2004).
  70. J. F. Stanton, J. Gauss, J. D. Watts et al., ACES II is a program product of the Quantum Theory Project, University of Florida. Integral packages included are VMOL (J. Almlöf and P. R. Taylor), VPROPS (P. Taylor), and ABACUS (T. Helgaker, H. J. Aa. Jensen, P. Jørgensen, J. Olsen, and P. R. Taylor).
  71. J. F. Stanton, J. Gauss, J. D. Watts et al., Mainz-Austin-Budapest ACES II, 2005.1, and the integral packages MOLECULE (J. Almlöf and P. R. Taylor), PROPS (P. R. Taylor), and ABACUS (T. Helgaker, H. J. Aa. Jensen, P. Jørgensen, and J. Olsen).
  72. A. D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 5648 (1992);
  73. C. Lee, W. Yang, and R. G. Parr, Phys. Rev. B 37, 785 (1988).
  74. M. Head-Gordon, J. A. Pople, and M. J. Frisch, Chem. Phys. Lett. 153, 503 (1988);
  75. M. J. Frisch, M. Head-Gordon, and J. A. Pople, ibid. 166, 281 (1990);
    166, 275 (1990);
    M. Head-Gordon and T. Head-Gordon, ibid. 220, 122 (1994).
  76. J. Cízek, J. Chem. Phys. 45, 4256 (1966);
  77. G. D. Purvis III and R. J. Bartlett, ibid. 76, 1910 (1982);
    G. E. Scuseria, C. L. Janssen, and H. F. Schaefer III, ibid. 89, 7382 (1988);
    G. E. Scuseria and H. F. Schaefer III, ibid. 90, 3700 (1989).
  78. R. J. Bartlett, J. D. Watts, S. A. Kucharski, and J. Noga, Chem. Phys. Lett. 165, 513 (1990);
  79. K. Raghavachari, G. W. Trucks, J. A. Pople, and M. Head-Gordon, ibid. 157, 479 (1989);
    G. E. Scuseria, J. Chem. Phys. 94, 442 (1991).
  80. T. H. Dunning, Jr., J. Chem. Phys. 90, 1007 (1989).
  81. P. C. Hariharan and J. A. Pople, Theor. Chim. Acta 28, 213 (1973);
  82. W. J. Hehre, R. Ditchfield, and J. A. Pople, J. Chem. Phys. 56, 2257 (1972).
  83. T. Clark, J. Chandrasekhar, F. W. Spitznagel, and P. v. R. Schleyer, J. Comput. Chem. 4, 294 (1980).
  84. R. Krishnan, J. S. Binkley, R. Seeger, and J. A. Pople, J. Chem. Phys. 72, 650 (1980).
  85. R. A. Kendall, T. H. Dunning, Jr., and R. J. Harrison, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 6796 (1992).
  86. R. Krishnan, M. J. Frisch, and J. A. Pople, J. Chem. Phys. 72, 4244 (1980);
  87. R. Krishnan and J. A. Pople, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 14, 91 (1978).
  88. H. Koch, H. J. A. Jensen, P. Jørgensen, T. Helgaker, G. E. Scuseria, and H. F. Schaefer III, J. Chem. Phys. 92, 4924 (1990).
  89. J. S. Lee, J. Chem. Phys. 106, 4022 (1997);
  90. A. Pipano, R. R. Gilman, and I. Shavitt, Chem. Phys. Lett. 5, 285 (1970).
  91. D. Cremer and Z. He, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 6173 (1996).
  92. H. Torii, A. Ishikawa, R. Takashima, and M. Tasumi, J. Mol. Struct. 500, 311 (2000).
  93. K. B. Wiberg, Y.-G. Wang, G. Trucks, and M. J. Frisch (unpublished).
  94. L. A. Burns, D. Murdock, and P. H. Vaccaro (unpublished).
  95. T. Oka and Y. Morino, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 6, 472 (1961);
  96. J. K. G. Watson, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 5302 (1993).
  97. T. Oka, J. Mol. Struct. 352/353, 225 (1995).
  98. W. Gordy and R. L. Cook, Microwave Molecular Spectra, 3rd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1984).
  99. See EPAPS Document No. E-JCPSA6-124-301619 for Table SI, containing the explicit harmonic frequencies for the TrOD isotopolog calculated by the DFT (B3LYP), MP2, and CCSD methods using the aug-cc-pVDZ basis set, and Fig. S1, illustrating the normal coordinate vectors for each of the 39 TrOH vibrational modes emerging from a CCSD/aug-cc-pVDZ analysis of the Cs molecular framework. This document can be reached via a direct link in the online article's HTML reference section or via the EPAPS homepage (http://www.aip.org/pubservs/epaps.html). [EPAPS]
  100. [I-dot]. Özkan, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 139, 147 (1990).
  101. J. T. Hougen and J. K. G. Watson, Can. J. Phys. 43, 298 (1965).
  102. F. Duschinsky, Acta Physicochim. URSS 7, 551 (1937);
  103. W. L. Smith, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 197, 6 (1998).
  104. Unless otherwise stated, mentioned harmonic frequencies refer to those calculated from CCSD/aug-cc-pVDZ force-field analyses.
  105. P. H. Vaccaro, in Nonlinear Spectroscopy for Molecular Structure Determination, edited by E. Hirota, R. W. Field, J. P. Maier, and S. Tsuchiya (Blackwell Scientific, London, 1998), p. 75.
  106. D. Murdock, L. A. Burns, and P. H. Vaccaro (unpublished).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.