Journal of Chemical Physics
The Journal of Chemical Physics
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Formaldehyde photodissociation: Dependence on total angular momentum and rotational alignment of the CO product
Quasiclassical trajectory calculations are reported to investigate the effects of rotational excitation of formaldehyde on the branching ratios of the fragmentation products, H2+CO and H+HCO. The resu...
Next Article
Time-dependent density functional theory Ehrenfest dynamics: Collisions between atomic oxygen and graphite clusters
An ab initio direct Ehrenfest dynamics method with time-dependent density functional theory is introduced and applied to collisions of 5  eV oxygen atoms and ions with graphite clusters. Col...

Infrared photodissociation of a water molecule from a flexible molecule-H2O complex: Rates and conformational product yields following XH stretch excitation

J. Chem. Phys. 126, 134306 (2007); doi:10.1063/1.2713109

Published 3 April 2007

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Jasper R. Clarkson
Department of Chemistry, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907

John M. Herbert
Department of Chemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210

Timothy S. Zwier
Department of Chemistry, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907
Infrared-ultraviolet hole-burning and hole-filling spectroscopies have been used to study IR-induced dissociation of the tryptamine·H2O and tryptamine·D2O complexes. Upon complexation of a single water molecule, the seven conformational isomers of tryptamine collapse to a single structure that retains the same ethylamine side chain conformation present in the most highly populated conformer of tryptamine monomer. Infrared excitation of the tryptamine·H2O complex was carried out using a series of infrared absorptions spanning the range of 2470–3715  cm−1. The authors have determined the conformational product yield over this range and the dissociation rate near threshold, where it is slow enough to be measured by our methods. The observed threshold for dissociation occurred at 2872  cm−1 in tryptamine·H2O and at 2869  cm−1 in tryptamine·D2O, with no dissociation occurring on the time scale of the experiment (~2  µs) at 2745  cm−1. The dissociation time constants varied from ~200  ns for the 2869  cm−1 band of tryptamine·D2O to ~25  ns for the 2872  cm−1 band of tryptamine·H2O. This large isotope dependence is associated with a zero-point energy effect that increases the binding energy of the deuterated complex by ~190  cm−1, thereby reducing the excess energy available at the same excitation energy. At all higher energies, the dissociation lifetime was shorter than the pulse duration of our lasers (8  ns). At all wavelengths, the observed products in the presence of collisions are dominated by conformers A and B of tryptamine monomer, with small contributions from the other minor conformers. In addition, right at threshold (2869  cm−1), tryptamine·D2O dissociates exclusively to conformer A in the absence of collisions with helium, while both A and B conformational products are observed in the presence of collisions with helium. Using resolution-of-identity approximation to second-order Møller-Plesset binding energies extrapolated to the complete basis set limit and harmonic vibrational frequencies and transition states calculated at the density functional limit B3LYP/6-31+G* level of theory, Rice-Ramsperger-Kassel-Marcus (RRKM) predictions for the dissociation, isomerization, and water shuttling rates as a function of energy are made. At threshold, the experimental dissociation rate is almost 103 faster than RRKM predictions. Reasons for this apparent non-RRKM behavior will be discussed. ©2007 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 8 November 2006; accepted 7 February 2007; published 3 April 2007
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/126/134306/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$28)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (653 kB) View Cart

Supplemental Material

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 87.15.Mi
    Spectra, photodissociation, and photoionization of biomolecules; bioluminescence
  • 87.15.Rn
    Biochemical reactions and kinetics; polymerization
  • 82.20.Hf
    Product distribution in chemical kinetics
  • 82.20.Tr
    Isotope effects in chemical kinetics including muonium
  • 82.50.Bc
    Chemical processes caused by infrared radiation
  • 82.50.Hp
    Chemical processes caused by visible and UV light
  • YEAR: 2007

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-9606 (print)   1089-7690 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (51)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. T. V. Nguyen, T. M. Korter, and D. W. Pratt, Mol. Phys. 103, 1603 (2005).
  2. Y. R. Wu and D. H. Levy, J. Chem. Phys. 91, 5278 (1989).
  3. L. A. Philips and D. H. Levy, J. Chem. Phys. 89, 85 (1988).
  4. J. R. Carney and T. S. Zwier, Chem. Phys. Lett. 341, 77 (2001).
  5. J. R. Carney and T. S. Zwier, J. Phys. Chem. A 104, 8677 (2000).
  6. T. S. Zwier, J. Phys. Chem. A 110, 4133 (2006).
  7. J. R. Clarkson, E. Baquero, and T. S. Zwier, J. Chem. Phys. 122, 214312 (2005).
  8. J. R. Clarkson, E. Baquero, V. A. Shubert, E. M. Myshakin, K. D. Jordan, and T. S. Zwier, Science 307, 1443 (2005).
  9. L. A. Peteanu and D. H. Levy, J. Phys. Chem. 92, 6554 (1988).
  10. L. L. Connell, T. C. Corcoran, P. W. Joireman, and P. M. Felker, J. Phys. Chem. 94, 1229 (1990).
  11. T. S. Zwier, J. Phys. Chem. A 105, 8827 (2001).
  12. M. Schmitt, M. Bohm, C. Ratzer, C. Vu, I. Kalkman, and W. L. Meerts, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 10356 (2005).
  13. B. C. Dian, A. Longarte, and T. S. Zwier, Science 296, 2369 (2002).
  14. M. F. Hineman, E. R. Bernstein, and D. E. Kelly, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 2516 (1993).
  15. E. R. Bernstein, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 46, 197 (1995).
  16. R. A. Markus, J. Chem. Phys. 20, 359 (1952).
  17. T. Baer and W. L. Hase, Unimolecular Reaction Dynamics: Theory and Experiments (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1996).
  18. B. C. Dian, A. Longarte, P. R. Winter, and T. S. Zwier, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 133 (2004).
  19. J. R. Carney, B. C. Dian, G. M. Florio, and T. S. Zwier, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 5596 (2001).
  20. R. N. Pribble, C. J. Gruenloh, and T. S. Zwier, Chem. Phys. Lett. 262, 627 (1996).
  21. M. J. Frisch, J. A. Pople, and J. S. Binkley, J. Chem. Phys. 80, 3265 (1984).
  22. C. Lee, W. Yang, and R. G. Parr, Phys. Rev. B 37, 785 (1988);
  23. A. D. Becke, Phys. Rev. A 38, 3098 (1988).
  24. M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel et al., GAUSSIAN03, Revision C.02 (Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford, CT, 2004).
  25. C. Peng and H. B. Schegel, Isr. J. Chem. 33, 449 (1993).
  26. S. Grimme, J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1463 (2004).
  27. S. F. Boys and F. Bernardi, Mol. Phys. 19, 553 (1970).
  28. M. Schutz, T. Burgi, S. Leutwyler, and T. Fischer, J. Chem. Phys. 99, 1469 (1993).
  29. F. Weigend and M. Häser, Theor. Chem. Acc. 97, 331 (1997).
  30. F. Weigend, M. Häser, H. Patzelt, and R. Ahlrichs, Chem. Phys. Lett. 294, 143 (1998).
  31. R. A. DiStasio, Jr., Y. Jung, and M. Head-Gordon, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 1, 862 (2005).
  32. F. Weigend, A. Köhn, and C. Hättig, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 3175 (2002).
  33. Y. Shao, L. F. Molnar, Y. Jung et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 8, 3172 (2006).
  34. R. A. DiStasio, Jr., R. P. Steele, Y. M. Rhee, Y. Shao, and M. Head-Gordon, J. Comput. Chem. (in press).
  35. A. Halkier, T. Helgaker, P. Jorgensen, W. Klopper, H. Koch, J. Olsen, and A. K. Wilson, Chem. Phys. Lett. 286, 243 (1998).
  36. M. Schmitt, R. Brause, C. M. Marian, S. Salzmann, and W. L. Meerts, J. Chem. Phys. 125, 124309 (2006).
  37. P. Salvador, S. Simon, M. Duran, and J. J. Dannenburg, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 5666 (2000);
  38. W. Zheng, W. Wang, X. Pu, A. Tian, and N. B. Wong, J. Mol. Struct.: THEOCHEM 631, 171 (2003).
  39. D. Moran, A. C. Simmonett, F. E. Leach, W. D. Allen, P. V. R. Schleyer, and H. F. Schaefer, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 9342 (2006).
  40. W. Caminati, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 6, 2806 (2004).
  41. J. R. Clarkson, B. C. Dian, L. Moriggi, A. DeFusco, V. McCarthy, K. D. Jordan, and T. S. Zwier, J. Chem. Phys. 122, 214311 (2005).
  42. S. M. Bellm and W. D. Lawrance, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 2581 (2003).
  43. Using an estimated TRA-He cross section of 200  Å2 and a backing pressure of 8  bar helium, we can estimate the total number of TRA-He collisions in the supersonic expansion as the complexes traverse the distance between IR excitation (x/D=2.5) and LIF detection (x/D=6). The highest collision rate occurs at x/D=2.5, where complex-He collisions occur on the 250  ps time scale.
  44. D. A. Evans, D. J. Wales, B. C. Dian, and T. S. Zwier, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 148 (2004).
  45. M. Schmitt, K. Feng, M. Bohm, and K. Kleinermanns, J. Chem. Phys. 125, 144303 (2006).
  46. G. E. Ewing, J. Phys. Chem. 91, 4662 (1987).
  47. B. K. Carpenter, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 56, 57 (2005).
  48. D. M. Leitner and P. G. Wolynes, Chem. Phys. 329, 163 (2006).
  49. D. M. Leitner (private communication).
  50. See EPAPS Document No. E-JCPSA6-126-007712 for Tables S1, S2, and S3 that include vibrational modes and frequencies used for the RRKM rate calculations. This document can be reached via a direct link in the online article's HTML reference section or via the EPAPS homepage (http://www.aip.org/pubservs/epaps.html). [EPAPS]
  51. V. Barone, J. Chem. Phys. 122, 014108 (2005);
  52. 120, 3059 (2004).
  53. R. Knochenmuss, V. Karbach, C. Wickleder, S. Graf, and S. Leutwyler, J. Phys. Chem. A 102, 1935 (1998).
  54. J. K. Agbo, D. M. Leitner, D. A. Evans, and D. J. Wales, J. Chem. Phys. 123, 124304 (2005);
  55. R. Bigwood and M. Gruebele, Chem. Phys. Lett. 235, 604 (1995);
    R. Bigwood, M. Gruebele, D. M. Leitner, and P. G. Wolynes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 5960 (1998).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.