Journal of Chemical Physics
Feedback | Help | Exit
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Structure of flexible and semiflexible polyelectrolyte chains in confined spaces of slit micro/nanochannels
Understanding the behavior of a polyelectrolyte in confined spaces has direct relevance in design and manipulation of microfluidic devices, as well as transport in living organisms. In this paper, a c...
Next Article
Hierarchical analysis of conformational dynamics in biomolecules: Transition networks of metastable states
Molecular dynamics simulation generates large quantities of data that must be interpreted using physically meaningful analysis. A common approach is to describe the system dynamics in terms of transit...

Automatic discovery of metastable states for the construction of Markov models of macromolecular conformational dynamics

J. Chem. Phys. 126, 155101 (2007); doi:10.1063/1.2714538

Published 19 April 2007

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

John D. Chodera
Graduate Group in Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143

Nina Singhal
Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305

Vijay S. Pande
Department of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305

Ken A. Dill
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143

William C. Swope
IBM Almaden Research Center, 650 Harry Road, San Jose, California 95120
To meet the challenge of modeling the conformational dynamics of biological macromolecules over long time scales, much recent effort has been devoted to constructing stochastic kinetic models, often in the form of discrete-state Markov models, from short molecular dynamics simulations. To construct useful models that faithfully represent dynamics at the time scales of interest, it is necessary to decompose configuration space into a set of kinetically metastable states. Previous attempts to define these states have relied upon either prior knowledge of the slow degrees of freedom or on the application of conformational clustering techniques which assume that conformationally distinct clusters are also kinetically distinct. Here, we present a first version of an automatic algorithm for the discovery of kinetically metastable states that is generally applicable to solvated macromolecules. Given molecular dynamics trajectories initiated from a well-defined starting distribution, the algorithm discovers long lived, kinetically metastable states through successive iterations of partitioning and aggregating conformation space into kinetically related regions. The authors apply this method to three peptides in explicit solvent—terminally blocked alanine, the 21-residue helical Fs peptide, and the engineered 12-residue beta-hairpin trpzip2—to assess its ability to generate physically meaningful states and faithful kinetic models. ©2007 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 21 November 2006; accepted 13 February 2007; published 19 April 2007
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/126/155101/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$24)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (1735 kB) View Cart

EDITORIALLY RELATED

  1. Hierarchical analysis of conformational dynamics in biomolecules: Transition networks of metastable states
    Frank Noé et al.
    J. Chem. Phys. 126, 155102 (2007)

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 36.20.Ey
    Macromolecular conformation (statistics and dynamics)
  • 36.20.Hb
    Macromolecular configuration (bonds, dimensions)
  • 87.15.He
    Biomolecular dynamics and conformational changes
  • 87.15.Aa
    Theory and modeling in molecular biophysics; computer simulation
  • 87.15.Rn
    Biochemical reactions and kinetics; polymerization
  • YEAR: 2007

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-9606 (print)   1089-7690 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (91)
View in Separate Window/Tab
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. C. M. Dobson, Nature (London) 426, 884 (2003).
  2. E. Z. Eisenmesser, D. A. Bosco, M. Akke, and D. Kern, Science 295, 1520 (2002).
  3. B. Youngblood and N. O. Reich, J. Biol. Chem. 281, 26821 (2006).
  4. D. D. Boehr, D. McElheny, H. J. Dyson, and P. E. Wright, Science 313, 1638 (2006).
  5. H. Frauenfelder, B. H. McMahon, R. H. Austin, K. Chu, and J. T. Groves, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 2370 (2001).
  6. J. Changeux and S. J. Edelstein, Science 308, 1424 (2005).
  7. N. Maki, K. Moitra, P. Ghosh, and S. Dey, J. Biol. Chem. 281, 10769 (2006).
  8. D. Moroni, T. S. van Erp, and P. G. Bolhuis, Physica A 340, 395 (2004).
  9. A. K. Faradjian and R. Elber, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 10880 (2004).
  10. Y. M. Rhee and V. S. Pande, J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 6780 (2005).
  11. A. Berezhkovskii and A. Szabo, J. Chem. Phys. 122, 014503 (2005).
  12. N. G. van Kampen, Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry, 2nd ed. (Elsevier, New York, 1997).
  13. R. Czerminski and R. Elber, J. Chem. Phys. 92, 5580 (1990).
  14. R. E. Kunz and R. S. Berry, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 1904 (1995).
  15. K. D. Ball and R. S. Berry, J. Chem. Phys. 109, 8557 (1998).
  16. Y. Levy, J. Jortner, and O. M. Becker, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 10533 (2001).
  17. P. N. Mortenson and D. J. Wales, J. Chem. Phys. 114, 6443 (2001).
  18. P. N. Mortenson, D. A. Evans, and D. J. Wales, J. Chem. Phys. 117, 1363 (2002).
  19. D. A. Evans and D. J. Wales, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 1080 (2004).
  20. D. Shalloway, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 9986 (1996).
  21. A. Ulitsky and D. Shalloway, J. Chem. Phys. 109, 1670 (1998).
  22. M. Shen and K. F. Freed, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 5143 (2003).
  23. H. Grubmüller and P. Tavan, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 5047 (1994).
  24. B. L. de Groot, X. Daura, A. E. Mark, and H. Grubmüller, J. Mol. Biol. 309, 299 (2001).
  25. W. C. Swope, J. W. Pitera, F. Suits et al., J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 6582 (2004).
  26. N. Singhal, C. D. Snow, and V. S. Pande, J. Chem. Phys. 121, 415 (2004).
  27. M. Andrec, A. K. Felts, E. Gallicchio, and R. M. Levy, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 6801 (2005).
  28. E. J. Sorin and V. S. Pande, Biophys. J. 88, 2472 (2005).
  29. S. Sriraman, I. G. Kevrekidis, and G. Hummer, J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 6479 (2005).
  30. V. Schultheis, T. Hirschberger, H. Carstens, and P. Tavan, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 1, 515 (2005).
  31. N. Singhal and V. S. Pande, J. Chem. Phys. 123, 204909 (2005).
  32. S. P. Elmer, S. Park, and V. S. Pande, J. Chem. Phys. 123, 114903 (2005).
  33. S. Park and V. S. Pande, J. Chem. Phys. 124, 054118 (2006).
  34. D. Chandler, J. Chem. Phys. 68, 2959 (1978).
  35. A. Ansari, J. Berendzen, S. F. Bowne, H. Frauenfelder, I. E. T. Iben, T. B. Sauke, E. Shyamsunder, and R. D. Young, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 82, 5000 (1985).
  36. Y. S. Bai and M. D. Fayer, Phys. Rev. B 39, 11066 (1989).
  37. O. M. Becker and M. Karplus, J. Chem. Phys. 106, 1495 (1997).
  38. Y. Levy, J. Jortner, and R. S. Berry, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 4, 5052 (2002).
  39. W. C. Swope, J. W. Pitera, and F. Suits, J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 6571 (2004).
  40. J. D. Chodera, W. C. Swope, J. W. Pitera, and K. A. Dill, Multiscale Model. Simul. 5, 1214 (2006).
  41. S. B. Ozkan, K. A. Dill, and I. Bahar, Protein Sci. 11, 1958 (2002).
  42. P. Lenz, B. Zagrovic, J. Shapiro, and V. S. Pande, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 6769 (2004).
  43. M. E. Karpen, D. J. Tobias, and C. L. Brooks III, Biochemistry 32, 412 (1993).
  44. C. Schütte, A. Fischer, W. Huisinga, and P. Deuflhard, J. Comput. Phys. 151, 146 (1999).
  45. C. Schütte and W. Huisinga, in Handbook of Numerical Analysis: Special Volume on Computational Chemistry, edited by P. G. Ciaret and J.-L. Lions (Elsevier, New York, 2002), Vol. X.
  46. Stochastic Processes in Chemical Physics: The Master Equation, edited by I. Oppenheim, K. E. Shuler, and G. H. Weiss (MIT, Cambridge, MA, 1977).
  47. C. Schütte, Ph.D. thesis, Konrad Zuse Zentrum Berlin, 1999.
  48. W. Huisinga, Ph.D. thesis, Free University of Berlin, 2001.
  49. M. P. Allen and D. J. Tildesley, Computer Simulation of Liquids (Clarendon, Oxford, 1991).
  50. M. Weber, Ph.D. thesis, Free University of Berlin, 2006.
  51. E. Meerback, C. Schütte, and A. Fischer, Linear Algebr. Appl. 398, 141 (2005).
  52. J. D. Chodera, W. C. Swope, J. W. Pitera, and K. A. Dill (unpublished).
  53. B. G. Fitch, R. S. Germain, M. Mendell et al., J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 63, 59 (2003).
  54. R. S. Germain, B. Fitch, A. Rayshubskiy, M. Eleftheriou, M. C. Pitman, F. Suits, M. Giampapa, and T. C. Ward, CODES+ISSS '05, Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE/ACM/IFIP International Conference on Hardware/Software Codesign and System Synthesis, Jersey City, NJ, 2005 (ACM Press, New York, NY) pp. 207–212.
  55. M. Shirts and V. S. Pande, Science 290, 1903 (2000).
  56. V. S. Pande, I. Baker, J. Chapman et al., Biopolymers 68, 91 (2003).
  57. W. Huisinga and B. Schmidt, New Algorithms for Macromolecular Simulation, Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering Vol. 49 (Springer, New York 2006), Part III.
  58. D. G. Truhlar, B. C. Garrett, and S. J. Klippenstein, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 2771 (1996).
  59. T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman, The Elements of Statistical Learning (Springer, New York, 2001).
  60. J. MacQueen, Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical statistics and probability (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1967) pp. 281–297.
  61. D. L. Theobald, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A: Found. Crystallogr. A61, 478 (2005).
  62. B. Steipe, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A: Found. Crystallogr. A58, 506 (2002).
  63. P. Deuflhard, W. Huisinga, A. Fischer, and C. Schütte, Numer. Linear Algebra Appl. 315, 39 (2000).
  64. B. Efron, Ann. Stat. 7, 1 (1979).
  65. W. C. Swope, H. C. Andersen, P. H. Berens, and K. R. Wilson, J. Chem. Phys. 76, 637 (1982).
  66. W. Janke, in Quantum Simulations of Complex Many-Body Systems: From Theory to Algorithms, Vol. 10, edited by J. Grotendorst, D. Marx, and A. Murmatsu (John von Neumann Institute for Computing, Jülich, Germany, 2002), pp. 423–445.
  67. J. Apostolakis, P. Ferrara, and A. Caflisch, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 2099 (1999).
  68. P. G. Bolhuis, C. Dellago, and D. Chandler, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 5877 (2000).
  69. G. Hummer and I. G. Kevrekidis, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 10762 (2003).
  70. D. S. Chekmarev, T. Ishida, and R. M. Levy, J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 19487 (2004).
  71. A. Ma and A. R. Dinner, J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 6769 (2005).
  72. P. A. Kollman, R. Dixon, W. Cornell, T. Vox, C. Chipot, and A. Pohorille, in Computer Simulation of Biomolecular Systems, edited by A. Wilkinson, P. Weiner, and W. F. van Gunsteren (Kluwer/Escom, Leiden, The Netherlands, 1997), Vol. 3, pp. 83–96.
  73. W. L. Jorgensen, J. Chandrasekhar, J. D. Madura, R. W. Impey, and M. L. Klein, J. Chem. Phys. 79, 926 (1983).
  74. S. Kumar, D. Bouzida, R. H. Swendsen, P. A. Kollman, and J. M. Rosenberg, J. Comput. Chem. 13, 1011 (1992).
  75. J. D. Chodera, W. C. Swope, J. W. Pitera, C. Seok, and K. A. Dill, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 3, 26 (2007).
  76. D. J. Lockhart and P. S. Kim, Science 257, 947 (1992).
  77. D. J. Lockhart and P. S. Kim, Science 260, 198 (1993).
  78. S. Williams, T. P. Causgrove, R. Gilmanshin, K. S. Fang, R. H. Callender, W. H. Woodruff, and R. B. Dyer, Biochemistry 35, 691 (1996).
  79. P. A. Thompson, W. A. Eaton, and J. Hofrichter, Biochemistry 36, 9200 (1997).
  80. I. K. Lednev, A. S. Karnoup, M. C. Sparrow, and S. A. Asher, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 2388 (2001).
  81. A. E. García and K. Y. Sanbonmatsu, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 2782 (2002).
  82. W. Zhang, H. Lei, S. Chowdbury, and Y. Duan, J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 7479 (2004).
  83. E. J. Sorin and V. S. Pande, J. Comput. Chem. 26, 682 (2005).
  84. J. Wang, P. Cieplak, and P. A. Kollman, J. Comput. Chem. 21, 1049 (2000).
  85. H. J. C. Berendsen, J. P. M. Postma, W. F. van Gunsteren, A. DiNola, and J. R. Haak, J. Chem. Phys. 81, 3684 (1984).
  86. Y. Duan, C. Wu, S. Chowdhury et al., J. Comput. Chem. 24, 1999 (2003).
  87. W. Y. Yang and M. Gruebele, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 7758 (2004).
  88. A. G. Cochran, N. J. Skelton, and M. A. Starovasnik, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 5578 (2001).
  89. J. W. Pitera, I. Haque, and W. C. Swope, J. Chem. Phys. 124, 141102 (2006).
  90. A FORTRAN 90/95 implementation of the automatic state decomposition algorithm presented here is available for download as part of the supplementary information for this article. The latest version of the code, along with the alanine dipeptide data set, can be obtained from http://www.dillgroup.ucsf.edu/~jchodera/code/automatic-state-decomposition/. The trpzip2 data set is available directly from W. C. Swope upon request (electronic mail: swope@almaden.ibm.com). A gallery of all macrostates produced by the 40-state decomposition of the trpzip2 peptide is also available as part of the supplementary information for this article.
  91. F. Noé, I. Horenko, C. Schütte, and J. C. Smith, J. Chem. Phys. 126, 155102 (2007).

CITING ARTICLES
For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.


Copyright © American Institute of Physics