Journal of Chemical Physics
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
On the helix-coil transition in alanine based polypeptides in gas phase
Using multicanonical simulations, the authors study the effect of charged end groups on helix formation in alanine based polypeptides. They confirm earlier reports that neutral polyalanine exhibits a ...
Next Article
Infrared spectra of the Li+–(H2)n (n=1–3) cation complexes
The Li+–(H2)n n=1–3 complexes are investigated through infrared spectra recorded in the H–H stretch region (3980–4120  cm−1) and through ab initio calculations ...

Reagents for electrophilic amination: A quantum Monte Carlo study

J. Chem. Phys. 126, 204308 (2007); doi:10.1063/1.2733664

Published 25 May 2007

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Carlos Amador-Bedolla
Departamento de Física y Química Teórica, Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autonóma de México, México, Distrito Federal 04510, Mexico and Kenneth S. Pitzer Center for Theoretical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720-1460

Romelia Salomón-Ferrer and William A. Lester, Jr.
Kenneth S. Pitzer Center for Theoretical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720-1460 and Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720

José Alfredo Vázquez-Martínez
Departamento de Química Orgánica, Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autonóma de México, México, Distrito Federal 04510, Mexico

Alán Aspuru-Guzik
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138
Electrophilic amination is an appealing synthetic strategy to construct carbon-nitrogen bonds. The authors explore the use of the quantum Monte Carlo method and a proposed variant of the electron pair localization function—the electron pair localization function density—as a measure of the nucleophilicity of nitrogen lone pairs as a possible screening procedure for electrophilic reagents. ©2007 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 2 November 2006; accepted 29 March 2007; published 25 May 2007
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/126/204308/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$24)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (207 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 82.20.Wt
    Computational modeling and simulation of chemical kinetics
  • 82.20.Fd
    Collision theories and trajectory models of chemical kinetics
  • YEAR: 2007

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-9606 (print)   1089-7690 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (37)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. C. Greck and J. P. Genêt, Synlett 7, 741 (1997).
  2. E. Erdick and M. Ay, Chem. Rev. (Washington, D.C.) 89, 1947 (1989).
  3. A. M. Berman and J. S. Johnson, J. Org. Chem. 71, 219 (2006).
  4. A. D. Becke and K. E. Edgecombe, J. Chem. Phys. 92, 5397 (1990).
  5. B. Silvi and A. Savin, Nature (London) 371, 683 (1994).
  6. A. Scemama, P. Chaquin, and M. Caffarel, J. Chem. Phys. 121, 1725 (2004).
  7. B. L. Hammond, W. A. Lester, Jr., and P. J. Reynolds, Monte Carlo Methods in Ab Initio Quantum Chemistry (World Scientific, Singapore, 1994).
  8. A. Aspuru-Guzik, R. Salomón-Ferrer, B. Austin, R. Perusquía-Flores, M. A. Griffin, R. A. Oliva, D. Skinner, D. Domin, and W. A. Lester, Jr., J. Comput. Chem. 26, 856 (2005).
  9. D. M. Ceperley and L. Mitas, in New Methods in Computational Quantum Mechanics, Advances in Chemical Physics Vol. XCIII, edited by I. Prigogine and S. A. Rice (Wiley, New York, 1996), pp. 1–38.
  10. J. B. Anderson, in Reviews in Computational Chemistry, edited by K. B. Lipkowitz and D. B. Boyd (Wiley-VCH, New York, 1999), Vol. 13, pp. 132–182.
  11. W. A. Lester, Jr. and B. L. Hammond, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 41, 283 (1990).
  12. L. Mitas, Comput. Phys. Commun. 97, 107 (1996).
  13. M. Foulkes, L. Mitas, R. Needs, and G. Rajagopal, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 33 (2001).
  14. A. Aspuru-Guzik and W. A. Lester, Jr., in Computational Chemistry, Handbook of Numerical Analysis Vol. X, edited by C. Le Bris (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2003), p. 485.
  15. J. B. Anderson, J. Chem. Phys. 65, 4121 (1976).
  16. P. J. Reynolds, D. M. Ceperley, B. Alder, and W. A. Lester, Jr., J. Chem. Phys. 77, 5593 (1982).
  17. J. C. Grossman, J. Chem. Phys. 117, 1434 (2002).
  18. M. Snajdr and S. M. Rothstein, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 4935 (2000).
  19. R. N. Barnett, P. J. Reynolds, and W. A. Lester, Jr., J. Comput. Phys. 96, 258 (1991).
  20. M. H. Kalos, D. Levesque, and L. Verlet, Phys. Rev. A 9, 2178 (1974).
  21. J. Casulleras and J. Boronat, Phys. Rev. B 52, 3654 (1995).
  22. F. Arias de Saavedra and M. H. Kalos, Phys. Rev. E 67, 026708 (2003).
  23. S. Baroni and S. Moroni, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4745 (1999).
  24. P. H. Acioli and D. M. Ceperley, Phys. Rev. B 54, 17199 (1996).
  25. R. F. W. Bader, Atoms in Molecules: A Quantum Theory (Clarendon, Oxford, 1990).
  26. D. B. Chesnut, J. Phys. Chem. A 104, 7635 (2000);
  27. 104, 11644 (2000).
  28. M. W. Schmidt, K. K. Baldridge, J. A. Boatz et al., J. Comput. Chem. 14, 1347 (1993).
  29. M. S. Gordon and M. W. Schmidt, in Theory and Applications of Computational Chemistry: The First Forty Years, edited by C. E. Dykstra, G. Frenking, K. S. Kim, and G. E. Scuseria (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2005).
  30. T. H. Dunning, Jr., J. Chem. Phys. 89, 1007 (1990).
  31. K. E. Schmidt and J. W. Moskowitz, J. Chem. Phys. 93, 4172 (1990).
  32. S. F. Boys and N. C. Handy, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 310, 63 (1969).
  33. C.-J. Huang, C. J. Umrigar, and M. P. Nightingale, J. Chem. Phys. 107, 3007 (1997) (discusses orders of BH function, which in the present case was kept to fourth order).
  34. Computational Chemistry Comparison and Benchmark Database, edited by P. J. Linstrom and W. G. Mallard, NIST Chemistry WebBook, NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69, June 2005, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg MD, 20899 (http://webbook.nist.gov).
  35. D. P. O'Neill and P. M. W. Gill, Mol. Phys. 103, 763 (2005).
  36. D. M. Ceperley and M. H. Kalos, in Monte Carlo Methods in Statistical Physics, edited by K. Binder (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1979), Chap. 4.
  37. M. M. Heaton and D. Mills, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 28, 163 (1985).
  38. Y. M. Xing, X. F. Xu, Z. S. Cai, and X. Z. Zhao, J. Mol. Struct.: THEOCHEM 671, 27 (2004).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.