Journal of Chemical Physics
Feedback | Help | Exit
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Extrapolating to the one-electron basis-set limit in electronic structure calculations
A simple, yet reliable, scheme based on treating uniformly singlet-pair and triplet-pair interactions is suggested to extrapolate atomic and molecular electron correlation energies calculated at two b...
Next Article
Diminished gradient dependence of density functionals: Constraint satisfaction and self-interaction correction
The Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) generalized gradient approximation for the exchange-correlation energy functional has two nonempirical constructions, based on satisfaction of universal exact constrai...

Second- and third-order triples and quadruples corrections to coupled-cluster singles and doubles in the ground and excited states

J. Chem. Phys. 126, 244106 (2007); doi:10.1063/1.2741262

Published 26 June 2007

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Toru Shiozaki
Department of Applied Chemistry, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan

Kimihiko Hirao
Department of Applied Chemistry, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan and CREST, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Saitama 332-0012, Japan

So Hirata
Quantum Theory Project, Department of Chemistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611-8435
Second- and third-order perturbation corrections to equation-of-motion coupled-cluster singles and doubles (EOM-CCSD) incorporating excited configurations in the space of triples [EOM-CCSD(2)T and (3)T] or in the space of triples and quadruples [EOM-CCSD(2)TQ] have been implemented. Their ground-state counterparts—third-order corrections to coupled-cluster singles and doubles (CCSD) in the space of triples [CCSD(3)T] or in the space of triples and quadruples [CCSD(3)TQ]—have also been implemented and assessed. It has been shown that a straightforward application of the Rayleigh-Schrödinger perturbation theory leads to perturbation corrections to total energies of excited states that lack the correct size dependence. Approximations have been introduced to the perturbation corrections to arrive at EOM-CCSD(2)T, (3)T, and (2)TQ that provide size-intensive excitation energies at a noniterative O(n7), O(n8), and O(n9) cost (n is the number of orbitals) and CCSD(3)T and (3)TQ size-extensive total energies at a noniterative O(n8) and O(n10) cost. All the implementations are parallel executable, applicable to open and closed shells, and take into account spin and real Abelian point-group symmetries. For excited states, they form a systematically more accurate series, CCSD<CCSD(2)T<CCSD(2)TQ<CCSD(3)T<CCSDT, with the second- and third-order corrections capturing typically ~80% and 100% of such effects, when those effects are large (>1  eV) and the ground-state wave function has single-determinant character. In other cases, however, the corrections tend to overestimate the triples and quadruples effects, the origin of which is discussed. For ground states, the third-order corrections lead to a rather small improvement over the highly effective second-order corrections [CCSD(2)T and (2)TQ], which is a manifestation of the staircase convergence of perturbation series. ©2007 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 22 February 2007; accepted 24 April 2007; published 26 June 2007
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/126/244106/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$24)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (203 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 31.15.Dv
    Coupled cluster theory (atoms and molecules)
  • 31.25.Jf
    Electron-correlation calculations for atoms and ions: excited states
  • YEAR: 2007

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-9606 (print)   1089-7690 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (74)
View in Separate Window/Tab
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. H. J. Monkhorst, Int. J. Quantum Chem., Symp. 11, 421 (1977).
  2. S. Ghosh, D. Mukherjee, and S. Bhattacharyya, Mol. Phys. 43, 173 (1981).
  3. E. Dalgaard and H. J. Monkhorst, Phys. Rev. A 28, 1217 (1983).
  4. M. Takahashi and J. Paldus, J. Chem. Phys. 85, 1486 (1986).
  5. H. Nakatsuji, Chem. Phys. Lett. 59, 362 (1978).
  6. H. Nakatsuji, Chem. Phys. Lett. 67, 329 (1979).
  7. H. Nakatsuji, Chem. Phys. Lett. 177, 331 (1991).
  8. K. Emrich, Nucl. Phys. A351, 379 (1981).
  9. K. Emrich, Nucl. Phys. A351, 397 (1981).
  10. H. Sekino and R. J. Bartlett, Int. J. Quantum Chem., Symp. 18, 255 (1984).
  11. J. Geertsen, M. Rittby, and R. J. Bartlett, Chem. Phys. Lett. 164, 57 (1989).
  12. D. C. Comeau and R. J. Bartlett, Chem. Phys. Lett. 207, 414 (1993).
  13. J. F. Stanton and R. J. Bartlett, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 7029 (1993).
  14. H. Koch, H. J. A. Jensen, P. Jørgensen, and T. Helgaker, J. Chem. Phys. 93, 3345 (1990).
  15. H. Koch and P. Jørgensen, J. Chem. Phys. 93, 3333 (1990).
  16. R. J. Rico and M. Head-Gordon, Chem. Phys. Lett. 213, 224 (1993).
  17. S. Hirata, J. Chem. Phys. 121, 51 (2004).
  18. M. Kállay and J. Gauss, J. Chem. Phys. 121, 9257 (2004).
  19. K. Raghavachari, G. W. Trucks, J. A. Pople, and M. Head-Gordon, Chem. Phys. Lett. 157, 479 (1989).
  20. J. D. Watts, J. Gauss, and R. J. Bartlett, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 8718 (1993).
  21. S. A. Kucharski and R. J. Bartlett, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 5243 (1998).
  22. S. A. Kucharski and R. J. Bartlett, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 9221 (1998).
  23. K. Kowalski and P. Piecuch, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 5644 (2000).
  24. K. Kowalski and P. Piecuch, Chem. Phys. Lett. 344, 165 (2001).
  25. S. R. Gwaltney and M. Head-Gordon, Chem. Phys. Lett. 323, 21 (2000).
  26. S. R. Gwaltney, C. D. Sherrill, M. Head-Gordon, and A. I. Krylov, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 3548 (2000).
  27. S. R. Gwaltney and M. Head-Gordon, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 2014 (2001).
  28. S. Hirata, P.-D. Fan, A. A. Auer, M. Nooijen, and P. Piecuch, J. Chem. Phys. 121, 12197 (2004).
  29. S. Hirata, M. Nooijen, I. Grabowski, and R. J. Bartlett, J. Chem. Phys. 114, 3919 (2001).
  30. S. Hirata, M. Nooijen, I. Grabowski, and R. J. Bartlett, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 3967 (2001).
  31. Y. J. Bomble, J. F. Stanton, M. Kállay, and J. Gauss, J. Chem. Phys. 123, 054101 (2005).
  32. M. Kállay and J. Gauss, J. Chem. Phys. 123, 214105 (2005).
  33. M. Kállay and P. R. Surján, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 2945 (2001).
  34. O. Christiansen, H. Koch, and P. Jørgensen, Chem. Phys. Lett. 243, 409 (1995).
  35. O. Christiansen, H. Koch, and P. Jørgensen, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 7429 (1995).
  36. H. Koch, O. Christiansen, P. Jørgensen, A. Sanchez De Meras, and T. Helgaker, J. Chem. Phys. 106, 1808 (1997).
  37. J. D. Watts and R. J. Bartlett, Chem. Phys. Lett. 233, 81 (1995).
  38. J. D. Watts and R. J. Bartlett, Chem. Phys. Lett. 258, 581 (1996).
  39. J. D. Watts, S. R. Gwaltney, and R. J. Bartlett, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 6979 (1996).
  40. K. Kowalski and P. Piecuch, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 1715 (2004).
  41. M. Wloch, J. R. Gour, K. Kowalski, and P. Piecuch, J. Chem. Phys. 122, 214107 (2005).
  42. J. F. Stanton and J. Gauss, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 1064 (1995).
  43. J. F. Stanton and J. Gauss, Theor. Chim. Acta 93, 303 (1996).
  44. J. F. Stanton and J. Gauss, Theor. Chim. Acta 95, 97 (1997).
  45. P.-O. Löwdin, J. Math. Phys. 3, 969 (1962).
  46. T. D. Crawford and J. F. Stanton, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 70, 601 (1998).
  47. J. E. Del Bene, J. D. Watts, and R. J. Bartlett, J. Chem. Phys. 106, 6051 (1997).
  48. S. Hirata, J. Phys. Chem. A 107, 9887 (2003).
  49. S. Hirata, Theor. Chem. Acc. 116, 2 (2006).
  50. S. Hirata, M. Nooijen, and R. J. Bartlett, Chem. Phys. Lett. 326, 255 (2000).
  51. N. H. March, W. H. Young, and S. Sampanthar, The Many-Body Problem in Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1967).
  52. S. Hirata, R. Podeszwa, M. Tobita, and R. J. Bartlett, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 2581 (2004).
  53. M. Nooijen, K. R. Shamasundar, and D. Mukherjee, Mol. Phys. 103, 2277 (2005).
  54. D. Mukhopadhyay, S. Mukhopadhyay, R. Chaudhuri, and D. Mukherjee, Theor. Chim. Acta 80, 441 (1991).
  55. L. Meissner and R. J. Bartlett, J. Chem. Phys. 102, 7490 (1995).
  56. M. Nooijen and R. J. Bartlett, J. Chem. Phys. 107, 6812 (1997).
  57. J. B. Foresman, M. Head-Gordon, J. A. Pople, and M. J. Frisch, J. Phys. Chem. 96, 135 (1992).
  58. M. Head-Gordon, R. J. Rico, M. Oumi, and T. J. Lee, Chem. Phys. Lett. 219, 21 (1994).
  59. S. Hirata, J. Chem. Phys. 122, 094105 (2005).
  60. T. P. Straatsma, E. Aprà, T. L. Windus et al., NWCHEM, a computational chemistry package for parallel computers, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, 2003.
  61. J. Olsen, P. Jørgensen, H. Koch, A. Balkova, and R. J. Bartlett, J. Chem. Phys. 104, 8007 (1996).
  62. H. Larsen, J. Olsen, P. Jørgensen, and O. Christiansen, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 6677 (2000).
  63. J. W. Krogh and J. Olsen, Chem. Phys. Lett. 344, 578 (2001).
  64. G. K.-L. Chan, M. Kállay, and J. Gauss, J. Chem. Phys. 121, 6110 (2004).
  65. O. Christiansen, H. Koch, P. Jørgensen, and J. Olsen, Chem. Phys. Lett. 256, 185 (1996).
  66. P.-D. Fan and S. Hirata, J. Chem. Phys. 124, 104108 (2006).
  67. P.-D. Fan, M. Kamiya, and S. Hirata, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 3, 1036 (2007).
  68. M. J. Weiss, C. E. Kuyatt, and S. Mielczarek, J. Chem. Phys. 54, 4147 (1971).
  69. J. E. Mentall, E. P. Gentieu, M. Krauss, and D. Neumann, J. Chem. Phys. 55, 5471 (1971).
  70. A. E. Douglas and J. R. Morton, Astrophys. J. 131, 1 (1960).
  71. M. Carre, Physica (Amsterdam) 41, 63 (1969).
  72. K. Kowalski and P. Piecuch, Chem. Phys. Lett. 347, 237 (2001).
  73. L. Meissner, Mol. Phys. 104, 2073 (2006).
  74. S. R. Gwaltney, M. Nooijen, and R. J. Bartlett, Chem. Phys. Lett. 248, 189 (1996).

CITING ARTICLES
For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.


Copyright © American Institute of Physics