OH
and O2H
double Rydberg anions: Predictions and comparisons with NH
and N2H
J. Chem. Phys. 127, 014307 (2007); doi:10.1063/1.2741558
Published 2 July 2007
You are not logged in to this journal. Log in
A low barrier in the reaction pathway between the double Rydberg isomer of OH
and a hydride-water complex indicates that the former species is more difficult to isolate and characterize through anion photoelectron spectroscopy than the well known double Rydberg anion (DRA), tetrahedral NH
. Electron propagator calculations of vertical electron detachment energies (VEDEs) and isosurface plots of the electron localization function disclose that the transition state's electronic structure more closely resembles that of the DRA than that of the hydride-water complex. Possible stabilization of the OH
DRA through hydrogen bonding or ion-dipole interactions is examined through calculations on O2H
species. Three O2H
minima with H−(H2O)2, hydrogen-bridged, and DRA-molecule structures resemble previously discovered N2H
species and have well separated VEDEs that may be observable in anion photoelectron spectra.
©2007 American Institute of Physics
| History: | Received 21 February 2007; accepted 26 April 2007; published 2 July 2007 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/127/014307/1 |
KEYWORDS and PACS
RELATED DATABASES
PUBLICATION DATA
0021-9606 (print)
1089-7690 (online)
REFERENCES (29)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- J. T. Snodgrass, J. V. Coe, C. B. Freidhoff, K. M. McHugh, and K. H. Bowen,
Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. 86, 241 (1988) . - J. Simons and M. Gutowski,
Chem. Rev. (Washington, D.C.) 91, 669 (1991) . - H. Hopper, M. Lococo, O. Dolgounitcheva, V. G. Zakrzewski, and J. V. Ortiz,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 12813 (2000) . - J. Melin, G. Seabra, and J. V. Ortiz, in Theoretical Aspects of Chemical Reactivity, edited by A. Toro-Labbé (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2007), pp. 87.
- J. T. Snodgrass, Ph.D. dissertation, Johns Hopkins University, 1986.
- J. V. Coe, Ph.D. dissertation, Johns Hopkins University, 1986.
- H. Cardy, C. Larrieu, and A. Dargelos,
Chem. Phys. Lett. 131, 507 (1986) . - D. Cremer and E. Kraka,
J. Phys. Chem. 90, 33 (1986) . - J. V. Coe, J. T. Snodgrass, C. B. Freidhoff, K. M. McHugh, and K. H. Bowen, J. Chem. Phys. 83, 3169 (1985).
- J. V. Ortiz, J. Chem. Phys. 87, 3557 (1987).
- M. Gutowski, J. Simons, R. Hernandez, and H. L. Taylor,
J. Phys. Chem. 92, 6179 (1988) . - M. Gutowski and J. Simons, J. Chem. Phys. 93, 3874 (1990).
- J. V. Ortiz,
J. Phys. Chem. 94, 4762 (1990) . - S. J. Xu, J. M. Niles, J. H. Hendricks, S. A. Lyapustina, and K. H. Bowen, J. Chem. Phys. 117, 5742 (2002);
- J. V. Ortiz, J. Chem. Phys. 117, 5748 (2002).
- J. V. Ortiz, Adv. Quantum Chem. 33, 35 (1999).
- J. V. Ortiz, J. Chem. Phys. 91, 7024 (1989).
- N. Matsunaga and M. S. Gordon,
J. Phys. Chem. 99, 12773 (1995) . - G. Trinquier, J. P. Daudey, G. Caruana, and Y. Madaule,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106, 4794 (1984) . - J. Moc and K. Morokuma,
Inorg. Chem. 33, 551 (1994) . - J. A. Pople, M. Head-Gordon, and K. Ragavachari, J. Chem. Phys. 87, 5968 (1987).
- R. Krishnan, J. S. Binkley, R. Seeger, and J. A. Pople, J. Chem. Phys. 72, 650 (1980);
- K. Fukui,
Acc. Chem. Res. 14, 363 (1981) ; - C. Gonzalez and H. B. Schlegel, J. Chem. Phys. 90, 2154 (1989).
- J. V. Ortiz, in Computational Chemistry: Reviews of Current Trends, edited by J. Leszczynski (World Scientific, Singapore, 1997), Vol. 2.
- M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel et al., GAUSSIAN 03 (Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh PA, 2003).
- J. V. Ortiz, J. Chem. Phys. 109, 5741 (1998).
- A. D. Becke and K. E. Edgecombe, J. Chem. Phys. 92, 5397 (1990).
- S. Noury, X. Krokisdis, F. Fuster, and B. Silvi,
Comput. Chem. (Oxford) 23, 597 (1999) . - B. Hibbard, J. Kellum, and B. Paul, VIS 5D, version 5.2, Visualization Project, University of Wisconsin-Madison Space Science and Engineering Center, 1990.








