Journal of Chemical Physics
The Journal of Chemical Physics
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Emission of Au nanoparticles with and without rhodamine 6G dye
We have observed Stokes and anti-Stokes emission of Au nanoparticles suspended in methanol and rhodamine 6G dye solution. Photoluminescence of Au nanoparticles is a three-step process involving single...
Next Article
Heat capacity of the liquid-liquid mixture nitrobenzene and dodecane near the critical point
The heat capacity of the liquid-liquid mixture nitrobenzene-dodecane has been measured for the first time near its upper critical consolute point using an adiabatic calorimeter. The theoretical expres...

Melting line of the Lennard-Jones system, infinite size, and full potential

J. Chem. Phys. 127, 104504 (2007); doi:10.1063/1.2753149

Published 13 September 2007

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Ethan A. Mastny and Juan J. de Pablo
Chemical and Biological Engineering Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1415 Engineering Drive, Madison, Wisconsin 53706–1691, USA
Literature estimates of the melting curve of the Lennard-Jones system vary by as much as 10%. The origin of such discrepancies remains unclear. We present precise values for the Lennard-Jones melting temperature, and we examine possible sources of systematic errors in the prediction of melting points, including finite-size and interaction-cutoff effects. A hypothetical thermodynamic integration path is used to find the relative free energies of the solid and liquid phases, for various system sizes, at constant cutoff radius. The solid-liquid relative free energy and melting temperature scale linearly as the inverse of the number of particles, and it is shown that finite-size effects can account for deviations in the melting temperature (from the infinite-size limit) of up to 5%. An extended-ensemble density-of-states method is used to determine free energy changes for each phase as a continuous function of the cutoff radius. The resulting melting temperature predictions exhibit an oscillatory behavior as the cutoff radius is increased. Deviations in the melting temperature (from the full potential limit) arising from a finite cutoff radius are shown to be of comparable magnitude as those resulting from finite-size effects. This method is used to identify melting temperatures at five different pressures, for the infinite-size and full potential Lennard-Jones system. We use our simulation results as references to connect the Lennard-Jones solid equation of state of van der Hoef with the Lennard-Jones fluid equation of state of Johnson. Once the references are applied the two equations of state are used to identify a melting curve. An empirical equation that fits this melting curve is provided. We also report a reduced triple point temperatureTtr=0.694. ©2007 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 9 February 2007; accepted 5 June 2007; published 13 September 2007
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/127/104504/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$28)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (368 kB) View Cart

Supplemental Material

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 64.70.Dv
    Solid–liquid transitions
  • 61.20.Ja
    Computer simulation of liquid structure
  • 65.20.+w
    Thermal properties of liquids: heat capacity, thermal expansion, etc
  • 64.10.+h
    General theory of equations of state and phase equilibria
  • YEAR: 2007

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-9606 (print)   1089-7690 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (15)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. G. Grochola, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 2122 (2004).
  2. D. M. Eike, J. F. Brennecke, and E. J. Maginn, J. Chem. Phys. 122, 014115 (2005).
  3. M. A. van der Hoef, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 8142 (2000).
  4. K. Johnson, J. A. Zollweg, and K. E. Gubbins, Mol. Phys. 78, 591 (1993).
  5. J.-P. Hansen and L. Verlet, Phys. Rev. 184, 151 (1969).
  6. R. Agrawal and D. A. Kofke, Mol. Phys. 85, 43 (1995).
  7. R. Agrawal and D. A. Kofke, Mol. Phys. 85, 23 (1995).
  8. J. R. Morris and X. Song, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 9352 (2002).
  9. J. R. Errington, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 3130 (2004).
  10. E. A. Mastny and J. J. de Pablo, J. Chem. Phys. 122, 124109 (2005).
  11. G. C. McNeil-Watson and N. Wilding, J. Chem. Phys. 124, 064504 (2006).
  12. D. Frenkel and B. Smit, Understanding Molecular Simulation From Algorithms to Applications (Academic, New York, 2002).
  13. E. B. Kim, R. Faller, Q. Yan, N. L. Abbott, and J. J. de Pablo, J. Chem. Phys. 117, 7781 (2002).
  14. N. Rathore, T. A. Knotts IV, and J. J. de Pablo, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 4285 (2003).
  15. See EPAPS Document No. E-JCPSA6-127-509727 for Lennard-Jones equation of state and solid-liquid equilibrium scripts. This document can be reached through a direct link in the online article's HTML reference section or via the EPAPS homepage (http://www.aip.org/pubservs/epaps.html). [EPAPS]

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.