Journal of Chemical Physics
The Journal of Chemical Physics
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Depletion interaction mediated by polydisperse rods
The interaction between a colloidal hard sphere of radius R and a wall or between two spheres in a dilute suspension of infinitely thin rods of length L is calculated numerically. The method allows th...
Next Article
Protein phase behavior and crystallization: Effect of glycerol
Glycerol is widely used as an additive to stabilize proteins in aqueous solution. We have studied the effect of up to 40  wt  % glycerol on the crystallization of lysozyme from bri...

Exploring transmembrane transport through alpha-hemolysin with grid-steered molecular dynamics

J. Chem. Phys. 127, 125101 (2007); doi:10.1063/1.2770738

Published 25 September 2007

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

David B. Wells, Volha Abramkina, and Aleksei Aksimentiev
Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA and Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA
The transport of biomolecules across cell boundaries is central to cellular function. While structures of many membrane channels are known, the permeation mechanism is known only for a select few. Molecular dynamics (MD) is a computational method that can provide an accurate description of permeation events at the atomic level, which is required for understanding the transport mechanism. However, due to the relatively short time scales accessible to this method, it is of limited utility. Here, we present a method for all-atom simulation of electric field-driven transport of large solutes through membrane channels, which in tens of nanoseconds can provide a realistic account of a permeation event that would require a millisecond simulation using conventional MD. In this method, the average distribution of the electrostatic potential in a membrane channel under a transmembrane bias of interest is determined first from an all-atom MD simulation. This electrostatic potential, defined on a grid, is subsequently applied to a charged solute to steer its permeation through the membrane channel. We apply this method to investigate permeation of DNA strands, DNA hairpins, and alpha-helical peptides through alpha-hemolysin. To test the accuracy of the method, we computed the relative permeation rates of DNA strands having different sequences and global orientations. The results of the G-SMD simulations were found to be in good agreement in experiment. ©2007 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 22 May 2007; accepted 19 July 2007; published 25 September 2007
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/127/125101/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$28)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (1742 kB) View Cart

Supplemental Material

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 87.16.Dg
    Biomembranes, bilayers, and vesicles
  • 87.16.Uv
    Biological active transport processes; ion channels
  • 87.14.Gg
    DNA, RNA
  • YEAR: 2007

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-9606 (print)   1089-7690 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (65)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. S. Bhakdi and J. Tranum-Jensen, Microbiol. Rev. 55, 733 (1991).
  2. J. J. Kasianowicz, E. Brandin, D. Branton, and D. W. Deamer, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93, 13770 (1996).
  3. M. Akenson, D. Branton, J. J. Kasianowicz, E. Brandin, and D. W. Deamer, Biophys. J. 77, 3227 (1999).
  4. S. M. Bezrukov, J. Membr. Biol. 174, 1 (2000).
  5. L-Q. Gu, O. Braha, S. Conlan, S. Cheley, and H. Bayley, Nature 398, 686 (1999).
  6. O. Braha et al., Nat. Biotechnol. 18, 1005 (2000).
  7. X. F. Kang, S. Cheley, X. Y. Guan, and H. Bayley, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 10684 (2006).
  8. J. S. L. Movileanu, J. P. Schmittschmitt, and H. Bayley, Biophys. J. 89, 1030 (2005).
  9. W. Vercoutere, S. Winters-Hilt, H. Olsen, D. Deamer, D. Haussler, and M. Akeson, Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 248 (2001).
  10. H. Wang, J. E. Dunning, A. P. H. Huang, J. A. Nyamwanda, and D. Branton, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 13472 (2004).
  11. J. J. Kasianowicz, S. E. Henrickson, H. H. Weetall, and B. Robertson, Anal. Chem. 73, 2268 (2001).
  12. S. Winters-Hilt and M. Akeson, DNA Cell Biol. 23, 675 (2004).
  13. C. Tropini and A. Marziali, Biophys. J. 95, 1632 (2007).
  14. B. Hornblower, A. Coombs, R. D. Whitaker, A. Kolomeisky, S. J. Picone, A. Meller, and M. Akeson, Nat. Mater. 4, 315 (2007).
  15. A. Meller, L. Nivon, E. Brandin, J. Golovchenko, and D. Branton, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 1079 (2000).
  16. N. Ashkenasy, J. Sánchez-Quesada, H. Bayley, and M. R. Ghadiri, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 44, 1401 (2005).
  17. Y. Astier, O. Braha, and H. Bayley, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 1705 (2006).
  18. D. Deamer and D. Branton, Acc. Chem. Res. 35, 817 (2002).
  19. H. Bayley, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 10, 628 (2006).
  20. B. L. de Groot and H. Grubmüller, Science 294, 2353 (2001).
  21. E. Tajkhorshid, P. Nollert, M. Ø. Jensen, L. J. W. Miercke, J. O'Connell, R. M. Stroud, and K. Schulten, Science 296, 525 (2002).
  22. B. Ilan, E. Tajkhorshid, K. Schulten, and G. A. Voth, Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 55, 223 (2004).
  23. S. Bernèche and B. Roux, Nature 414, 73 (2001).
  24. W. Im and B. Roux, J. Mol. Biol. 319, 1177 (2002).
  25. C. Domene, P. J. Bond, and M. S. P. Sansom, Adv. Protein Chem. 66, 159 (2003).
  26. T. Allen, O. Andersen, and B. Roux, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 117 (2004).
  27. L. Monticelli, K. Robertson, J. MacCallum, and D. Tieleman, FEBS Lett. 564, 325 (2004).
  28. S. Noskov, S. Berneche, and B. Roux, Nature 431, 830 (2004).
  29. K. M. Robertson and D. P. Tieleman, FEBS Lett. 528, 53 (2002).
  30. M. Ceccarelli, C. Danelon, A. Laio, and M. Parrinello, Biophys. J. 87, 58 (2004).
  31. M. P. Allen and D. J. Tildesley, Computer Simulation of Liquids (Oxford University Press, New York, 1987).
  32. J. Mathé, A. Aksimentiev, D. R. Nelson, K. Schulten, and A. Meller, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 12377 (2005).
  33. J. C. Phillips, R. Braun, W. Wang, J. Gumbart, E. Tajkhorshid, E. Villa, C. Chipot, R. D. Skeel, L. Kalé, and K. Schulten, J. Comput. Chem. 26, 1781 (2005).
  34. A. Aksimentiev and K. Schulten, Biophys. J. 88, 3745 (2005).
  35. B. Isralewitz, S. Izrailev, and K. Schulten, Biophys. J. 73, 2972 (1997).
  36. H. Grubmüller, B. Heymann, and P. Tavan, Science 271, 997 (1996).
  37. S. -J. Marrink, O. Berger, P. Tieleman, and F. Jähnig, Biophys. J. 74, 931 (1998).
  38. C. Jarzynski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2690 (1997).
  39. S. Park and K. Schulten, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 5946 (2004).
  40. Y. Kong, Y. Shen, T. E. Warth, and J. Ma, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 5999 (2002).
  41. C. Chen and E. Peng, Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 1308 (2003).
  42. A. Milchev, K. Binder, and A. Bhattacharya, J. Chem. Phys. 121, 6042 (2004).
  43. S. Kotev and A. Kolomeisky, J. Chem. Phys. 125, 084906 (2006).
  44. M. Muthukumar and C. Y. Kong, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 5273 (2006).
  45. Y. Wang, K. Schulten, and E. Tajkhorshid, Rev. Fac. Cienc. Med. Univ. Nac. Cordoba 13, 1107 (2005).
  46. J. Gumbart and K. Schulten, Biophys. J. 90, 2356 (2006).
  47. A. Aksimentiev, J. B. Heng, G. Timp, and K. Schulten, Biophys. J. 87, 2086 (2004).
  48. L. Zhang and J. Hermans, Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 24, 433 (1996).
  49. W. L. Jorgensen, J. Chandrasekhar, J. D. Madura, R. W. Impey, and M. L. Klein, J. Chem. Phys. 79, 926 (1983).
  50. J. B. Heng, A. Aksimentiev, C. Ho, P. Marks, Y. V. Grinkova, S. Sligar, K. Schulten, and G. Timp, Biophys. J. 90, 1098 (2006).
  51. Polygen Corporation, 200 Fifth Ave., Waltham, MA 02254, QUANTA, 1988.
  52. P. F. Batcho, D. A. Case, and T. Schlick, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 4003 (2001).
  53. W. D. Cornell, P. Cieplak, C. I. Bayly, I. R. Gould, K. M. Merz, D. M. Ferguson, D. C. Spellmeyer, T. Fox, J. W. Caldwell, and P. A. Kollman, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 5179 (1995).
  54. A. D. MacKerell, Jr., D. Bashford, M. Bellott, R. L. Dunbrack, Jr., J. D. Evanseck, M. J. Field, S. Fischer, J. Gao, H. Guo, S. Ha, D. Joseph-McCarthy, L. Kuchnir, K. Kuczera, F. T. K. Lau, C. Mattos, S. Michnick, T. Ngo, D. T. Nguyen, B. Prodhom, W. E. Reiher, III, B. Roux, M. Schlenkrich, J. C. Smith, R. Stote, J. Straub, M. Watanabe, J. Wiórkiewicz-Kuczera, D. Yin, and M. Karplus, J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 3586 (1998).
  55. A. T. Brünger, X-PLOR, Version 3.1: A System for X-ray Crystallography and NMR (The Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, 1992).
  56. G. J. Martyna, D. J. Tobias, and M. L. Klein, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 4177 (1994).
  57. P. S. Crozier, D. Henderson, R. L. Rowley, and D. D. Busath, Biophys. J. 81, 3077 (2001).
  58. See EPAPS Document No. E-JCPSA6-127-508733 for details of all simulations, information on an arrested translocation, and movies of DNA and peptide permeation. This document can be reached through a direct link in the online article's HTML reference section or via the EPAPS homepage (http://www.aip.org/pubservs/epaps.html. [EPAPS]
  59. W. Humphrey, A. Dalke, and K. Schulten, J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33 (1996).
  60. D. K. Lubensky and D. R. Nelson, Biophys. J. 77, 1824 (1999).
  61. T. Ambjörnsson, S. P. Apell, Z. Konkoli, E. A. D. Marzio, and J. J. Kasianowicz, Biophys. J. 117, 4063 (2002).
  62. E. Slonkina and A. B. Kolomeisky, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 7112 (2003).
  63. O. Flomenborn and J. Klafter, Biophys. J. 86, 3576 (2004).
  64. S. Bransburg-Zabary, E. Nachliel, and M. Gutman, Biophys. J. 83, 3001 (2002).
  65. S. Bransburg-Zabary, E. Nachliel, and M. Gutman, Solid State Ionics 168, 235 (2004).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.