Assessment of transition operator reference states in electron propagator calculations
J. Chem. Phys. 127, 134106 (2007); doi:10.1063/1.2784638
Published 4 October 2007
You are not logged in to this journal. Log in
The transition operator method combined with second-order, self-energy corrections to the electron propagator (TOEP2) may be used to calculate valence and core-electron binding energies. This method is tested on a set of molecules to assess its predictive quality. For valence ionization energies, well known methods that include third-order terms achieve somewhat higher accuracy, but only with much higher demands for memory and arithmetic operations. Therefore, we propose the use of the TOEP2 method for the calculation of valence electron binding energies in large molecules where third-order methods are infeasible. For core-electron binding energies, TOEP2 results exhibit superior accuracy and efficiency and are relatively insensitive to the fractional occupation numbers that are assigned to the transition orbital.
©2007 American Institute of Physics
| History: | Received 23 July 2007; accepted 22 August 2007; published 4 October 2007 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/127/134106/1 |
REFERENCES (36)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- T. Koopmans,
Physica (Amsterdam) 1, 104 (1933) . - P. Bagus,
Phys. Rev. 139, 619 (1965) . - J. Linderberg and Y. Öhrn, Propagators in Quantum Chemistry, 2nd ed. (Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, NJ, 2004).
- W. von Niessen, J. Schirmer, and L. S. Cederbaum,
Comput. Phys. Rep. 1, 57 (1984) . - J. V. Ortiz,
Adv. Quantum Chem. 35, 33 (1999) . - B. T. Pickup and O. Goscinski,
Mol. Phys. 26, 1013 (1973) . - J. V. Ortiz, Computational Chemistry: Reviews of Current Trends (World Scientific, Singapore, 1997), Vol. 2.
- J. V. Ortiz, J. Chem. Phys. 104, 7599 (1996).
- S. F. Abdulnur, J. Linderberg, Y. Öhrn, and W. Thulstrup,
Phys. Rev. A 6, 889 (1972) . - G. D. Purvis and Y. Öhrn, J. Chem. Phys. 65, 917 (1976).
- G. Born, H. A. Kurtz, and Y. Öhrn, J. Chem. Phys. 68, 74 (1978).
- H. A. Kurtz and Y. Öhrn, J. Chem. Phys. 69, 1162 (1978).
- J. V. Ortiz, R. Basu, and Y. Öhrn,
Chem. Phys. Lett. 103, 29 (1983) . - J. C. Slater and J. H. Wood, Int. J. Quantum Chem. Suppl. 4, 3 (1971).
- J. C. Slater,
Adv. Quantum Chem. 6, 1 (1972) . - P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn,
Phys. Rev. 136, B864 (1964) . - W. Kohn and L. J. Sham,
Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 (1965) . - J. F. Janak,
Phys. Rev. B 18, 7165 (1978) . - A. R. Williams, R. A. deGroot, and C. B. Sommers, J. Chem. Phys. 63, 628 (1975).
- D. P. Chong, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 1842 (1995).
- D. P. Chong and C.-H. Hu, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 8950 (1998).
- O. Goscinski, G. Howat, and T. Åberg,
J. Phys. B 8, 11 (1975) . - G. D. Purvis and Y. Öhrn, J. Chem. Phys. 62, 2045 (1975).
- M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, J. A. Montgomery, Jr., T. Vreven, K. N. Kudin, J. C. Burant, J. M. Millam, S. S. Iyengar, J. Tomasi, V. Barone, B. Mennucci, M. Cossi, G. Scalmani, N. Rega, G. A. Petersson, H. Nakatsuji, M. Hada, M. Ehara, K. Toyota, R. Fukuda, J. Hasegawa, M. Ishida, T. Nakajima, Y. Honda, O. Kitao, H. Nakai, M. Klene, X. Li, J. E. Knox, H. P. Hratchian, J. B. Cross, V. Bakken, C. Adamo, J. Jaramillo, R. Gomperts, R. E. Stratmann, O. Yazyev, A. J. Austin, R. Cammi, C. Pomelli, J. W. Ochterski, P. Y. Ayala, K. Morokuma, G. A. Voth, P. Salvador, J. J. Dannenberg, V. G. Zakrzewski, S. Dapprich, A. D. Daniels, M. C. Strain, O. Farkas, D. K. Malick, A. D. Rabuck, K. Raghavachari, J. B. Foresman, J. V. Ortiz, Q. Cui, A. G. Baboul, S. Clifford, J. Cioslowski, B. B. Stefanov, G. Liu, A. Liashenko, P. Piskorz, I. Komaromi, R. L. Martin, D. J. Fox, T. Keith, M. A. Al-Laham, C. Y. Peng, A. Nanayakkara, M. Challacombe, P. M. W. Gill, B. Johnson, W. Chen, M. W. Wong, C. Gonzalez, and J. A. Pople, GAUSSIAN 03, revision D.01, Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford, CT, 2004.
- T. H. Dunning, J. Chem. Phys. 90, 1007 (1989).
- The transformation factor from atomic units to electron volts is critical for accurate calculation of core ionization potentials. We use 1 a.u.=27.211 38 eV as suggested by NIST at http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/energy.html.
- A. M. Ferreira, G. Seabra, O. Dolgounitcheva, V. G. Zakrzewski, and J. V. Ortiz, Quantum-Mechanical Prediction of Thermochemical Data (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2001), pp. 131–160.
- Structure Data of Free Polyatomic Molecules, edited by K.-L. Hellwege, Landolt-Börnstein, New Series, Group II, Vol. 7 (Springer, Berlin, 1976).
- K. P. Huber and G. Herzberg, Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure (Van Nostrand-Reinhold, New York, 1979).
- W. L. Jolly, K. D. Bomben, and C. J. Eyermann,
At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 31, 433 (1984) . - E. Clementi and D. L. Raimondi, J. Chem. Phys. 38, 2686 (1963).
- C. W. Bauschlicher, Jr. and P. R. Taylor, J. Chem. Phys. 85, 2779 (1986).
- M. Ehara and H. Nakatsuji,
Chem. Phys. Lett. 282, 347 (1998) . - C. W. Bauschlicher, Jr. and P. R. Taylor, J. Chem. Phys. 86, 2844 (1986).
- Ionization potentials for atoms were taken from NIST tables at http://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/IonEnergy/tblNew.html
- R. C. Morrison and G. Liu,
J. Comput. Chem. 13, 1004 (1992) .








