Journal of Chemical Physics
Feedback | Help | Exit
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Effects of surface passivation on the exciton dynamics of CdSe nanocrystals as observed by ultrafast fluorescence upconversion spectroscopy
The exciton dynamics of CdSe nanocrystals are intimately linked to the surface morphology. Photo-oxidation of the selenium surfaces of the nanocrystal leads to an increase in radiative decay efficienc...
Next Article
Density, distribution, and orientation of water molecules inside and outside carbon nanotubes
The behavior of water molecules inside and outside 1.1, 2.8, 6.9, and 10.4  nm diameter armchair carbon nanotubes (CNTs) is predicted using molecular dynamics simulations. The effects of CNT...

The AM05 density functional applied to solids

J. Chem. Phys. 128, 084714 (2008); doi:10.1063/1.2835596

Published 29 February 2008

You are logged in to this journal.

Ann E. Mattsson,1 Rickard Armiento,2 Joachim Paier,3 Georg Kresse,3 John M. Wills,4 and Thomas R. Mattsson5
1Multiscale Dynamic Materials Modeling MS 1322, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185-1322, USA
2Physics Institute, University of Bayreuth, D-95440 Bayreuth, Germany
3Faculty of Physics and Center for Computational Materials Science, University of Vienna, Sensengasse 8/12, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
4Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
5High Energy Density Physics Theory, MS 1186, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185-1186, USA
We show that the AM05 functional [Armiento and Mattsson, Phys. Rev. B 72, 085108 (2005)] has the same excellent performance for solids as the hybrid density functionals tested in Paier et al. [J. Chem. Phys. 124, 154709 (2006); 125, 249901 (2006)]. This confirms the original finding that AM05 performs exceptionally well for solids and surfaces. Hartree–Fock hybrid calculations are typically an order of magnitude slower than local or semilocal density functionals such as AM05, which is of a regular semilocal generalized gradient approximation form. The performance of AM05 is on average found to be superior to selecting the best of local density approximation and PBE for each solid. By comparing data from several different electronic-structure codes, we have determined that the numerical errors in this study are equal to or smaller than the corresponding experimental uncertainties. ©2008 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 19 October 2007; accepted 17 December 2007; published 29 February 2008
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/128/084714/1
FULL TEXT OPTIONS   (FREE)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (143 kB) Author Select

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 71.15.Mb
    Density functional theory, local density approximation, gradient and other corrections (condensed matter electronic structure)
  • 71.15.Ap
    Basis sets and related methodology (condensed matter electronic structure)
  • YEAR: 2008

RELATED DATABASES

Scopus

View This Record in Scopus

Web of Science

View this record in Web of Science

View Web of Science related articles

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-9606 (print)   1089-7690 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (64)
View in Separate Window/Tab
  1. P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. 136, B864 (1964).
  2. W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 (1964).
  3. R. Armiento and A. E. Mattsson, Phys. Rev. B 72, 085108 (2005).
  4. J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996). [MEDLINE]
  5. A. D. Becke, Phys. Rev. A 38, 3098 (1988). [MEDLINE]
  6. C. Lee, W. Yang, and R. G. Parr, Phys. Rev. B 37, 785 (1988). [MEDLINE]
  7. B. Hammer, L. B. Hansen, and J. K. Nørskov, Phys. Rev. B 59, 7413 (1999).
  8. J. P. Perdew, M. Ernzerhof, and K. Burke, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 9982 (1996).
  9. C. Adamo and V. Barone, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 6158 (1999).
  10. J. Paier, M. Marsman, K. Hummer, G. Kresse, I. C. Gerber, and J. G. Ángyán, J. Chem. Phys. 124, 154709 (2006); [MEDLINE]
    11. 125, 249901 (2006). [MEDLINE]
  11. G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Phys. Rev. B 47, R558 (1993);
    12. 49, 14251 (1994); [MEDLINE]
    G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, ibid. 54, 11169 (1996). [MEDLINE]
  12. The calculations were made using version 5.1.38 of the VASP code.
  13. J. Paier, R. Hirschl, M. Marsman, and G. Kresse, J. Chem. Phys. 122, 234102 (2005). [MEDLINE]
  14. P. J. Feibelman, Science 295, 5552 (2002).
  15. D. Asthagiri, L. R. Pratt, and J. D. Kress, Phys. Rev. E 68, 041505 (2003).
  16. E. Schwegler, J. C. Grossman, F. Gygi, and G. Galli, J. Chem. Phys. 121, 5400 (2004). [MEDLINE]
  17. J. VandeVondele, F. Mohamed, M. Krack, J. Hutter, and M. Parrinello, J. Chem. Phys. 122, 014515 (2005). [ISI] [MEDLINE]
  18. H.-L. Sit and N. Marzari, J. Chem. Phys. 122, 204510 (2005). [ISI] [MEDLINE]
  19. H. S. Lee and M. Tuckerman, J. Chem. Phys. 125, 154507 (2006). [MEDLINE]
  20. A. E. Mattsson and T. R. Mattsson (unpublished).
  21. A. E. Mattsson, P. A. Schultz, M. P. Desjarlais, T. R. Mattsson, and K. Leung, Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 13, R1 (2005).
  22. A. E. Mattsson, R. Armiento, P. A. Schultz, and T. R. Mattsson, Phys. Rev. B 73, 195123 (2006).
  23. B. Santra, A. Michaelides, and M. Scheffler, J. Chem. Phys. 127, 184104 (2007). [MEDLINE]
  24. R. Armiento and A. E. Mattsson, Phys. Rev. B 66, 165117 (2002).
  25. D. M. Ceperley and B. J. Alder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 566 (1980).
  26. J. P. Perdew and Y. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 45, 13244 (1992). [MEDLINE]
  27. J. P. Perdew and A. Zunger, Phys. Rev. B 23, 5048 (1981).
  28. W. Kohn and A. E. Mattsson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3487 (1998).
  29. A. E. Mattsson and W. Kohn, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 3441 (2001).
  30. J. P. Perdew, J. Tao, and R. Armiento, Acta Phys. Chim. Debrecina 36, 25 (2003).
  31. N. D. Lang and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. B 1, 4555 (1970).
  32. L. Vitos, B. Johansson, J. Kollár, and H. L. Skriver, Phys. Rev. B 62, 10046 (2000). [ISI] [ChemPort]
  33. G. H. Gonnet, D. E. G. Hare, D. J. Jeffrey, and D. E. Knuth, Adv. Comput. Math. 5, 329 (1996).
  34. Z. Yan, J. P. Perdew, and S. Kurth, Phys. Rev. B 61, 16430 (2000).
  35. Subroutines for AM05 are available from two of the authors (A.E.M. and R.A.).
  36. S. Kurth, J. P. Perdew, and P. Blaha, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 75, 889 (1999).
  37. Z. Wu and R. E. Cohen, Phys. Rev. B 73, 235116 (2006);
    38. F. Tran, R. Laskowski, P. Blaha, and K. Schwarz, ibid. 75, 115131 (2007).
  38. J. P. Perdew, A. Ruzsinszky, G. I. Csonka, O. A. Vydrov, G. E. Scuseria, L. A. Constantin, X. Zhou, and K. Burke (unpublished).
  39. J. Tao, J. P. Perdew, V. N. Staroverov, and G. E. Scuseria, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 146401 (2003); [MEDLINE]
    40. V. N. Staroverov, G. E. Scuseria, J. T. Tao, and J. P. Perdew, Phys. Rev. B 69, 075102 (2004).
  40. X.-Y. Pan, V. Sahni, and L. Massa, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 107, 816 (2006).
  41. J. Paier, M. Marsman, and G. Kresse, J. Chem. Phys. 127, 024103 (2007). [ISI] [MEDLINE]
  42. Y. Zhang and W. Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 890 (1998).
  43. L. A. Curtiss, K. Raghavachari, P. C. Redfern, and J. A. Pople, J. Chem. Phys. 106, 1063 (1997). [ChemPort]
  44. A. D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 1372 (1993).
  45. A. D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 5648 (1993). [ChemPort]
  46. J. Harris and R. O. Jones, J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. 4, 1170 (1974).
  47. O. Gunnarsson and B. I. Lundqvist, Phys. Rev. B 13, 4274 (1976).
  48. D. C. Langreth and J. P. Perdew, J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. 15, 2884 (1977).
  49. J. Harris, Phys. Rev. A 29, 1648 (1984).
  50. M. Ernzerhof, Chem. Phys. Lett. 263, 499 (1996).
  51. M. Ernzerhof, J. P. Perdew, and K. Burke, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 64, 285 (1996). [Inspec] [ISI] [ChemPort]
  52. M. Ernzerhof and G. E. Scuseria, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 5029 (1999).
  53. V. N. Staroverov, G. E. Scuseria, J. Tao, and J. P. Perdew, J. Chem. Phys. 119, 12129 (2003).
  54. J. Heyd, J. E. Peralta, G. E. Scuseria, and R. L. Martin, J. Chem. Phys. 123, 174101 (2005). [MEDLINE]
  55. A. V. Krukau and O. A. Vydrov, A. F. Izmaylov, and G. E. Scuseria, J. Chem. Phys. 125, 224106 (2006). [MEDLINE]
  56. P. E. Blöchl, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994); [MEDLINE]
    57. G. Kresse and D. Joubert, ibid. 59, 1758 (1999).
  57. P. E. Blöchl, O. Jepsen, and O. K. Andersen, Phys. Rev. B 49, 16223 (1994). [MEDLINE]
  58. H. J. Monkhorst and J. D. Pack, Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188 (1976).
  59. J. M. Wills, O. Eriksson, M. Alouani, and D. L. Price, Lect. Notes Phys. 535, 148 (2000); [ChemPort]
    60. AM05 is implemented in the version available at http://www.rspt.net
  60. F. D. Murnaghan, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 30, 244 (1944). [ISI] [MEDLINE]
  61. J. Heyd and G. E. Scuseria, J. Chem. Phys. 121, 1187 (2004). [MEDLINE]
  62. H. M. Tütüncü, S. Bagci, G. P. Srivastava, A. T. Albudak, and G. Ugur, Phys. Rev. B 71, 195309 (2005). [ISI]
  63. In practice, basis sets, k points, pseudopotentials, and other numerical approximations come into play. There is, however, a fundamental difference between the two sources of errors: Shortcomings in the XC functional cannot be mitigated by improvements in the numerical precision.
  64. AM05 is implemented in the main version of VASP 5.1 and its use is invoked by setting GGA=AM in the INCAR file.

Copyright © American Institute of Physics