Journal of Chemical Physics
The Journal of Chemical Physics
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Allovalency revisited: An analysis of multisite phosphorylation and substrate rebinding
The utilization of multiple phosphorylation sites in regulating a biological response is ubiquitous in cell signaling. If each site contributes an additional, equivalent binding site, then one consequ...
Next Article
Protein association with circular DNA: Rate enhancement by nonspecific binding
An analytical solution for the nonspecific-binding-facilitated diffusion-controlled rate of association of a protein with a specific site on a circular DNA is derived. Nonspecific binding is modeled b...

Sensitivity of peptide conformational dynamics on clustering of a classical molecular dynamics trajectory

J. Chem. Phys. 128, 115107 (2008); doi:10.1063/1.2838980

Published 21 March 2008

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Christian H. Jensen, Dmitry Nerukh, and Robert C. Glen
Unilever Centre for Molecular Science Informatics, Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, CB2 1EW Cambridge, United Kingdom
We investigate the sensitivity of a Markov model with states and transition probabilities obtained from clustering a molecular dynamics trajectory. We have examined a 500  ns molecular dynamics trajectory of the peptide valine-proline-alanine-leucine in explicit water. The sensitivity is quantified by varying the boundaries of the clusters and investigating the resulting variation in transition probabilities and the average transition time between states. In this way, we represent the effect of clustering using different clustering algorithms. It is found that in terms of the investigated quantities, the peptide dynamics described by the Markov model is sensitive to the clustering; in particular, the average transition times are found to vary up to 46%. Moreover, inclusion of nonphysical sparsely populated clusters can lead to serious errors of up to 814%. In the investigation, the time step used in the transition matrix is determined by the minimum time scale on which the system behaves approximately Markovian. This time step is found to be about 100  ps. It is concluded that the description of peptide dynamics with transition matrices should be performed with care, and that using standard clustering algorithms to obtain states and transition probabilities may not always produce reliable results. ©2008 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 10 July 2007; accepted 8 January 2008; published 21 March 2008
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/128/115107/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$28)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (808 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 87.15.ap
    Molecular dynamics simulation in molecular biophysics
  • 87.15.hg
    Dynamics of intermolecular interactions in biomolecules
  • 87.15.hp
    Conformational changes of biomolecules
  • YEAR: 2008

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-9606 (print)   1089-7690 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (17)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. K. F. Lau and K. A. Dill, Macromolecules 22, 3986 (1989).
  2. S. A. Adcock and J. A. McCammon, Chem. Rev. (Washington, D.C.) 106, 1589 (2006).
  3. D. Hamelberg, J. Mongan, and J. A. McCammon, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 11919 (2004).
  4. U. H. E. Hansmann, Chem. Phys. Lett. 281, 140 (1997).
  5. Y. Sugita and Y. Okamoto, Chem. Phys. Lett. 314, 141 (1999).
  6. X. W. Wu and S. M. Wang, J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 7238 (1998).
  7. X. W. Wu and S. M. Wang, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 9401 (1999).
  8. S. V. Krivov, S. F. Chekmarev, and M. Karplus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 038101 (2002).
  9. N. Singhal, C. D. Snow, and V. S. Pande, J. Chem. Phys. 121, 415 (2004).
  10. G. Jayachandran, V. Vishal, and V. S. Pande, J. Chem. Phys. 124, 164902 (2006).
  11. W. C. Swope, J. W. Pitera, and F. Suits, J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 6571 (2004).
  12. W. C. Swope, J. W. Pitera, F. Suits, M. Pitman, M. Eleftheriou, B. G. Fitch, R. S. Germain, A. Rayshubski, T. J. C. Ward, Y. Zhestkov, and R. Zhou, J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 6582 (2004).
  13. D. Van der Spoel, E. Lindahl, B. Hess, G. Groenhof, A. E. Mark, and H. J. C. Berendsen, J. Comput. Chem. 26, 1701 (2005).
  14. B. Hess and N. F. A. van der Vegt, J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 17616 (2006).
  15. C. Oostenbrink, T. A. Soares, N. F. A. van der Vegt, and W. F. van Gunsteren, Eur. Biophys. J. 34, 273 (2005).
  16. C. Oostenbrink, A. Villa, A. E. Mark, and W. F. Van Gunsteren, J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1656 (2004).
  17. H. J. C. Berendsen, J. P. M. Postma, W. F. van Gunsteren, A. DiNola, and J. R. Haak, J. Chem. Phys. 81, 3684 (1984).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.