Potential energy surfaces for the 1 4A
, 2 4A
1 4A
and 2 4A
states of Li3
J. Chem. Phys. 129, 124305 (2008); doi:10.1063/1.2985857
Published 24 September 2008
You are not logged in to this journal. Log in
Global potential energy surfaces for the 1 4A
, 2 4A
, 1 4A
, and 2 4A
spin-aligned states of Li3 are constructed as sums of a diatomics-in-molecules (DIM) term plus a three-body term. The DIM model, using a large basis set of 15 4A
and 22 4A
states, is used to obtain a “mixed-pairwise additive” contribution to the potential. A global fit of the three-body terms conserves the accuracy of the ab initio points of a full configuration-interaction calculation. The resulting fit accurately describes conical intersections for both the 1 4A
and 2 4A
surfaces with a root-mean-square (rms) deviation of 5.4×10−5 hartree in D
h geometries and 1.2×10−4 hartree in C
v geometries. The global fit appears to be quantitatively correct with a rms deviation of 1.8×10−4hartree for 1 4A
, 9.2×10−4 hartree for 2 4A
, 2.5×10−4 hartree for 1 4A
, and 5.1×10−4 hartree for 2 4A
. A possible diabolic conical intersection, also called an accidental degeneracy, in C2v geometries, indicating a seam of conical intersections in Cs geometries, is also found in ab initio calculations for A2 states. As shown in this example, the DIM procedure can be optimized to describe the geometric phase and nonadiabatic effects in multisurface potentials.
©2008 American Institute of Physics
, 2 4A
, 1 4A
, and 2 4A
spin-aligned states of Li3 are constructed as sums of a diatomics-in-molecules (DIM) term plus a three-body term. The DIM model, using a large basis set of 15 4A
and 22 4A
states, is used to obtain a “mixed-pairwise additive” contribution to the potential. A global fit of the three-body terms conserves the accuracy of the ab initio points of a full configuration-interaction calculation. The resulting fit accurately describes conical intersections for both the 1 4A
and 2 4A
surfaces with a root-mean-square (rms) deviation of 5.4×10−5 hartree in D
h geometries and 1.2×10−4 hartree in C
v geometries. The global fit appears to be quantitatively correct with a rms deviation of 1.8×10−4hartree for 1 4A
, 9.2×10−4 hartree for 2 4A
, 2.5×10−4 hartree for 1 4A
, and 5.1×10−4 hartree for 2 4A
. A possible diabolic conical intersection, also called an accidental degeneracy, in C2v geometries, indicating a seam of conical intersections in Cs geometries, is also found in ab initio calculations for A2 states. As shown in this example, the DIM procedure can be optimized to describe the geometric phase and nonadiabatic effects in multisurface potentials.
©2008 American Institute of Physics
| History: | Received 9 July 2008; accepted 28 August 2008; published 24 September 2008 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/129/124305/1 |
REFERENCES (24)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- D. G. Fried, T. C. Killan, L. Willmann, D. Landhuis, S. C. Moss, D. Kleppner, and T. S. Greytak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3811 (1998).
- C. C. Bradley, C. A. Sackett, J. J. Tollett, and R. G. Hulet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1687 (1995).
- K. B. Davis, M. -O. Mewes, M. R. Andrews, N. J. van Druten, D. S. Durfee, D. M. Kurn, and W. Ketterle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3969 (1995).
- M. H. Anderson, J. R. Ensher, M. R. Mathews, C. E. Wieman, and E. A. Cornell,
Science 269, 198 (1995) . - M. Weber, J. Herbig, M. Mark, H. -C. Nägerl, and R. Grimm,
Science 299, 232 (2003) . - F. D. Colavecchia, J. P. Burke, Jr., W. J. Stevens, M. R. Salazar, G. A. Parker, and R. T. Pack, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 5484 (2003).
- M. T. Cvitaš, P. Soldán, J. M. Hutson, P. Honvault, and J. -M. Launay, J. Chem. Phys. 127, 074302 (2007).
- M. T. Cvitaš, P. Soldán, J. M. Hutson, P. Honvault, and J. -M. Launay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 033201 (2005).
- M. T. Cvitaš, P. Soldán, and J. M. Hutson,
Mol. Phys. 104, 23 (2006) . - D. A. Brue, X. Li, and G. A. Parker, J. Chem. Phys. 123, 091101 (2005).
- J. Higgins, T. Hollebeek, J. Reho, T. -S. Ho, K. K. Lehmann, H. Rabitz, and G. Scoles, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 5751 (2000), and reference therein.
- F. O. Ellison,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 85, 3540 (1963) . - J. C. Tully, J. Chem. Phys. 58, 1396 (1973).
- E. Steiner, P. R. Certain, and P. J. Kuntz, J. Chem. Phys. 59, 47 (1973).
- C. W. Eaker and C. A. Parr, J. Chem. Phys. 64, 1322 (1976).
- B. Kendrick and R. T. Pack, J. Chem. Phys. 102, 1994 (1995).
- W. J. Stevens, H. Basch, and M. Krauss, J. Chem. Phys. 81, 6026 (1984).
- A. Aguado, C. Tablero, and M. Paniagua,
Comput. Phys. Commun. 108, 259 (1998) . - B. M. Axilrod and E. Teller, J. Chem. Phys. 11, 299 (1943).
- Y. Muto, Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. Jpn. 17, 629 (1943).
- MOLPRO, a package of ab initio programs designed by H. -J. Werner, and P. J. Knowles, version 2006.1, R. Lindh, M. Schütz, P. Celani, T. Korana, F. R. Manby, G. Rauhut, R. D. Amos, A. Bernhardsson et al., 2006.
- A. Ross, personal communication (May 15, 2002).
- D. R. Yarkony, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 3639 (1994).
- D. R. Yarkony, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 985 (1996).








