Journal of Chemical Physics
The Journal of Chemical Physics
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Molecular orientation studies by pulsed electron-electron double resonance experiments
Pulsed electron-electron double resonance (PELDOR) has proven to be a valuable tool to measure the distribution of long range distances in noncrystalline macromolecules. These experiments commonly use...
Next Article
Molecular photoionization cross sections by Stieltjes–Chebyshev moment theory applied to Lanczos pseudospectra
Stieltjes imaging technique is widely used for the ab initio computation of photoionization cross sections and decay widths. The main problem hampering the application of the standard Stieltjes imagin...

The subtle business of model reduction for stochastic chemical kinetics

J. Chem. Phys. 130, 064103 (2009); doi:10.1063/1.3072704

Published 10 February 2009

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Dan T. Gillespie,1 Yang Cao,2 Kevin R. Sanft,3 and Linda R. Petzold3
1Dan T. Gillespie Consulting, 30504 Cordoba Place, Castaic, California 91384, USA
2Department of Computer Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA
3Department of Computer Science, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA

This paper addresses the problem of simplifying chemical reaction networks by adroitly reducing the number of reaction channels and chemical species. The analysis adopts a discrete-stochastic point of view and focuses on the model reaction set S1[r harp over l]S2-->S3, whose simplicity allows all the mathematics to be done exactly. The advantages and disadvantages of replacing this reaction set with a single S3-producing reaction are analyzed quantitatively using novel criteria for measuring simulation accuracy and simulation efficiency. It is shown that in all cases in which such a model reduction can be accomplished accurately and with a significant gain in simulation efficiency, a procedure called the slow-scale stochastic simulation algorithm provides a robust and theoretically transparent way of implementing the reduction. ©2009 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 14 July 2008; accepted 28 December 2008; published 10 February 2009
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/130/064103/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$28)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (335 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 82.20.Uv
    Stochastic theories of rate constants in chemical kinetics
  • 82.20.Wt
    Computational modeling and simulation of chemical kinetics
  • YEAR: 2009

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-9606 (print)   1089-7690 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (14)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. L. Michaelis and M. L. Menten, Biochem. Z. 49, 333 (1913).
  2. G. E. Briggs and J. B. S. Haldane, Biochem. J. 19, 338 (1925)
  3. D. L. Nelson and M. M. Cox, Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry (Freeman, San Francisco, 2005).
  4. J. A. Borghans, R. J. deBoer, and L. A. Segel, Bull. Math. Biol. 58, 43 (1996).
  5. A. R. Tzafriri and E. R. Edelman, J. Theor. Biol. 226, 303 (2004).
  6. D. Barik, M. Paul, W. Baumann, Y. Cao, and J. Tyson, Biophys. J. 95, 3563 (2008).
  7. Y. Cao, D. T. Gillespie, and L. R. Petzold, J. Chem. Phys. 122, 014116 (2005).
  8. E. A. Mastny, E. L. Haseltine, and J. B. Rawlings, J. Chem. Phys. 127, 094106 (2007).
  9. For a review of the stochastic simulation algorithm, the chemical master equation, and related topics, see D. T. Gillespie, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 58, 35 (2007).
  10. D. T. Gillespie, S. Lampoudi, and L. R. Petzold, J. Chem. Phys. 126, 034302 (2007)
  11. S. Lampoudi, D. T. Gillespie, and L. R. Petzold, “Effect of excluded volume on 2D discrete stochastic chemical kinetics,” J. Comput. Phys. (in press).
  12. If c2=0 and c3>=c1, Eq. (8) gives lambda+=c3 and lambda=c1. Setting those results into Eq. (9) gives a formula that is indeterminate when c3=c1. But applying L'Hospital's rule to that indeterminate form, taking derivatives with respect to c3 yields the pdf c<sub>1</sub><sup>2</sup>tec1t. This nonexponential form, which goes to zero as t-->0, is the pdf of the gamma random variable Gamma(c1,2), which is defined as the sum of two statistically independent exponentials with the same mean c<sub>1</sub><sup>-1</sup>. And this is exactly what we should expect for the time for an S1S3 conversion via reactions (1) when c2=0 and c3=c1.
  13. E. L. Haseltine and J. B. Rawlings, J. Chem. Phys. 117, 6959 (2002).
  14. C. Rao and A. P. Arkin, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 4999 (2003).
  15. In Ref. 6, it was stated that the condition for applying the ssSSA to reactions (1) is (c1+c2)2>>c1c3x12. That is incorrect, as it arises from comparing a single-walker timescale with a many-walker timescale. The correct condition is simply c2>>c3, as can be seen not only from the result (3) but also from the argument at Eq. (29). The reason why it is not necessary to supplement the condition c2>>c3 with the condition c1>>c3 is explained in the second paragraph of Sec. VI.
  16. D. A. McQuarrie, J. Chem. Phys. 38, 433 (1963)
  17. I. G. Darvey, B. W. Ninham, and P. J. Staff, ibid. 45, 2145 (1966).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.