Journal of Chemical Physics
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
On the definition of discrete hydrodynamic variables
The Green–Kubo formula for discrete hydrodynamic variables involves information about not only the fluid transport coefficients but also about discrete versions of the differential operators tha...
Next Article
Wavepacket approach to the cumulative reaction probability within the flux operator formalism
Expressions for the singular flux operator eigenfunctions and eigenvalues are given in terms of the Dirac -function representable as a localized Gaussian wavepacket. This functional form enables compu...

Molecular acidity: A quantitative conceptual density functional theory description

J. Chem. Phys. 131, 164107 (2009); doi:10.1063/1.3251124

Published 23 October 2009

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Shubin Liu,1 Cynthia K. Schauer,2 and Lee G. Pedersen2,3
1Research Computing Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3420, USA
2Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3290, USA
3Laboratory of Structural Biology, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, P.O. Box 12233, North Carolina 27709, USA

Accurate predictions of molecular acidity using ab initio and density functional approaches are still a daunting task. Using electronic and reactivity properties, one can quantitatively estimate pKa values of acids. In a recent paper [S. B. Liu and L. G. Pedersen, J. Phys. Chem. A 113, 3648 (2009)], we employed the molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) on the nucleus and the sum of valence natural atomic orbital (NAO) energies for the purpose. In this work, we reformulate these relationships on the basis of conceptual density functional theory and compare the results with those from the thermodynamic cycle method. We show that MEP and NAO properties of the dissociating proton of an acid should satisfy the same relationships with experimental pKa data. We employ 27 main groups and first to third row transition metal-water complexes as illustrative examples to numerically verify the validity of these strong linear correlations. Results also show that the accuracy of our approach and that of the conventional method through the thermodynamic cycle are statistically similar. ©2009 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 19 July 2009; accepted 30 September 2009; published 23 October 2009
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/131/164107/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$24)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (398 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 82.30.Lp
    Decomposition chemical reactions (pyrolysis, dissociation, and fragmentation)
  • 82.20.Ej
    Quantum theory of reaction cross section in chemical kinetics
  • 82.60.Hc
    Chemical equilibria and equilibrium constants
  • YEAR: 2009

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-9606 (print)   1089-7690 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (44)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. W. L. Jorgensen, J. M. Briggs, and J. Gao, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 109, 6857 (1987).
  2. C. Lim, D. Bashford, and M. Karplus, J. Phys. Chem. 95, 5610 (1991).
  3. M. J. Potter, M. K. Gilson, and J. A. McCammon, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116, 10298 (1994)
  4. J. E. Nielsen and J. A. McCammon, Protein Sci. 12, 1894 (2003)
  5. C. A. Fitch and B. Garcia-Moreno, Biophys. J. 86, 86A (2004).
  6. G. Alagona, C. Ghio, and P. A. Kollman, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 9855 (1995).
  7. P. Politzer, Theor. Chem. Acc. 111, 395 (2004)
  8. P. Politzer, Y. G. Ma, A. F. Jalbout, and J. S. Murray, Mol. Phys. 103, 15 (2005).
  9. G. da Silva, E. M. Kennedy, and B. Z. Dlugogorski, J. Phys. Chem. A 110, 11371 (2006)
  10. K. Ohno and M. Sakurai, J. Comput. Chem. 27, 906 (2006)
  11. C. M. MacDermaid and G. A. Kaminski, J. Phys. Chem. B 111, 9036 (2007).
  12. A. Klamt, F. Eckert, M. Diedenhofen, and M. E. Beck, J. Phys. Chem. A 107, 9380 (2003)
  13. M. Namazian and S. Halvani, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 38, 1495 (2006).
  14. H. Li, A. D. Robertson, and J. H. Jensen, Proteins: Struct., Funct., Bioinf. 4, 704 (2007)
  15. N. Goudarzi and M. Goudarzi, Mol. Phys. 107, 1495 (2009).
  16. J. E. Nielsen, Methods Enzymol. 454, 233 (2009)
  17. J. C. Dearden, M. T. D. Cronin, and D. C. Lappin, J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 59, A7 (2007)
  18. A. P. Harding, D. C. Wedge, and P. L. A. Popelier, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 49, 1914 (2009).
  19. F. De Proft, S. Amira, K. Choho, and P. Geerlings, J. Phys. Chem. B 98, 5227 (1995).
  20. H. J. S. Machado and A. Hinchliffe, J. Mol. Struct.: THEOCHEM 339, 255 (1995).
  21. R. C. Deka, R. K. Roy, and K. Hirao, Chem. Phys. Lett. 389, 186 (2004).
  22. K. Gupta, D. R. Roy, V. Subramanian, and P. K. Chattaraj, J. Mol. Struct.: THEOCHEM 812, 13 (2007).
  23. S. B. Liu and L. G. Pedersen, J. Phys. Chem. A 113, 3648 (2009).
  24. R. G. Parr and W. Yang, Density-Functional Theory of Atoms and Molecules (Oxford University Press, New York, 1989).
  25. P. Geerlings, F. De Proft, and W. Langenaeker, Chem. Rev. (Washington, D.C.) 103, 1793 (2003)
  26. P. Geerlings and F. De Proft, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 10, 3028 (2008).
  27. P. K. Chattaraj, U. Sarkar, and D. R. Roy, Chem. Rev. (Washington, D.C.) 106, 2065 (2006).
  28. S. B. Liu, Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. 25, 590 (2009).
  29. J. R. Pliego, Chem. Phys. Lett. 367, 145 (2003).
  30. S. B. Liu, T. Li, and P. W. Ayers, J. Chem. Phys. 131, 114106 (2009).
  31. P. W. Ayers, S. B. Liu, and T. Li, Chem. Phys. Lett. 480, 348 (2009).
  32. G. Wulfsberg, Principles of Descriptive Inorganic Chemistry (University Science Books, Sausalito, CA, 1991), p. 25.
  33. C. Lee, W. Yang, and R. G. Parr, Phys. Rev. B 37, 785 (1988).
  34. A. D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 104, 1040 (1996).
  35. A. D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 1372 (1993).
  36. P. J. Hay and W. R. Wadt, J. Chem. Phys. 82, 270 (1985).
  37. S. B. Liu and Y. X. Yu, J. Mol. Struct.: THEOCHEM 235, 115 (1991).
  38. S. B. Liu and W. Langenaeker, Theor. Chem. Acc. 110, 338 (2003).
  39. A. G. Zhong and S. B. Liu, J. Theor. Comput. Chem. 4, 833 (2005).
  40. C. Rong, S. Lian, D. Yin, B. Shen, A. Zhong, L. Bartolotti, and S. B. Liu, J. Chem. Phys. 125, 174102 (2006).
  41. J. K. Badenhoop and F. Weinhold, J. Chem. Phys. 107, 5406 (1997).
  42. V. Barone and M. Cossi, J. Phys. Chem. A 102, 1995 (1998).
  43. M. Cossi, N. Rega, G. Scalmani, and V. Barone, J. Comput. Chem. 24, 669 (2003).
  44. M. Liptak and G. C. Shields, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 85, 727 (2001)
  45. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 7314 (2001).
  46. J. Y. Lee, B. J. Byun, and Y. K. Kang, J. Phys. Chem. B 112, 11189 (2008).
  47. M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel et al., GAUSSIAN 03, Revision C.02, Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford CT, 2004.
  48. R. G. Parr and R. G. Pearson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 105, 7512 (1983).
  49. R. G. Pearson, J. Chem. Educ. 64, 561 (1987).
  50. R. G. Pearson, Chemical Hardness (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1997).
  51. P. W. Ayers, Faraday Discuss. 135, 161 (2007).
  52. R. G. Parr, L. von Szentpaly, and S. B. Liu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 1922 (1999).
  53. S. B. Liu, in Chemical Reactivity Theory: A Density Functional View, edited by P. K. Chattaraj (Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, 2009), p. 179.
  54. A. Cedillo, R. Contreras, M. Galvan, A. Aizman, J. Andres, and V. S. Safont, J. Phys. Chem. A 111, 2442 (2007).
  55. J. J. Klicic, R. A. Friesner, S. -Y. Liu, and W. C. Guida, J. Phys. Chem. A 106, 1327 (2002).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.