Journal of Chemical Physics
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Molecular acidity: A quantitative conceptual density functional theory description
Accurate predictions of molecular acidity using ab initio and density functional approaches are still a daunting task. Using electronic and reactivity properties, one can quantitatively estimate pKa v...
Next Article
A diffusional bimolecular propensity function
We derive an explicit formula for the propensity function (stochastic reaction rate) of a generic bimolecular chemical reaction in which the reactant molecules move about by diffusion, as solute molec...

Wavepacket approach to the cumulative reaction probability within the flux operator formalism

J. Chem. Phys. 131, 164108 (2009); doi:10.1063/1.3251333

Published 26 October 2009

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Sophya Garashchuk and Tijo Vazhappilly
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208, USA
Expressions for the singular flux operator eigenfunctions and eigenvalues are given in terms of the Dirac delta-function representable as a localized Gaussian wavepacket. This functional form enables computation of the cumulative reaction probability N(E) from the wavepacket time-correlation functions. The Gaussian based form of the flux eigenfunctions, which is not tied to a finite basis of a quantum-mechanical calculation, is particularly useful for approximate calculation of N(E) with the trajectory based wavepacket propagation techniques. Numerical illustration is given for the Eckart barrier using the conventional quantum-mechanical propagation and the quantum trajectory dynamics with the approximate quantum potential. N(E) converges with respect to the Gaussian width parameter, and the convergence is faster at low energy. The approximate trajectory calculation overestimates tunneling in the low energy regime, but gives a significant improvement over the parabolic estimate of the tunneling probability. ©2009 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 10 July 2009; accepted 30 September 2009; published 26 October 2009
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/131/164108/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$24)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (214 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 82.20.Pm
    Chemical rate constants, reaction cross sections, and activation energies
  • 82.20.Xr
    Quantum effects in rate constants (chemical kinetics)
  • 82.20.Fd
    Collision theories and trajectory models of chemical kinetics
  • YEAR: 2009

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-9606 (print)   1089-7690 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (31)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. W. H. Miller, S. D. Schwartz, and J. W. Tromp, J. Chem. Phys. 79, 4889 (1983).
  2. T. J. Park and J. C. Light, J. Chem. Phys. 88, 4897 (1988).
  3. T. Seideman and W. H. Miller, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 1768 (1991).
  4. D. H. Zhang and J. C. Light, J. Chem. Phys. 104, 6184 (1996).
  5. J. C. Light and D. H. Zhang, Faraday Discuss. 110, 105 (1998).
  6. T. Yamamoto, H. Wang, and W. H. Miller, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 7335 (2002).
  7. C. Venkataraman and W. H. Miller, J. Chem. Phys. 126, 094104 (2007).
  8. M. D. Feit, J. A. Fleck, Jr., and A. Steiger, J. Comput. Phys. 47, 412 (1982).
  9. S. Garashchuk and V. A. Rassolov, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 1181 (2004).
  10. G. Arfken, Mathematical Methods for Physicists, 3rd ed. (Academic, New York, 1985).
  11. F. Matzkies and U. Manthe, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 88 (1999).
  12. E. J. Heller, J. Chem. Phys. 62, 1544 (1975).
  13. E. J. Heller, J. Chem. Phys. 75, 2923 (1981).
  14. R. C. Brown and E. J. Heller, J. Chem. Phys. 75, 186 (1981).
  15. M. F. Herman and E. Kluk, Chem. Phys. 91, 27 (1984).
  16. K. G. Kay, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 4377 (1994).
  17. M. Thachuk and G. C. Schatz, J. Chem. Phys. 97, 7297 (1992).
  18. F. Grossmann and E. J. Heller, Chem. Phys. Lett. 241, 45 (1995).
  19. D. T. Colbert and W. H. Miller, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 1982 (1992).
  20. E. Pollak, J. Chem. Phys. 107, 64 (1997).
  21. U. Manthe and F. Matzkies, Chem. Phys. Lett. 282, 442 (1998).
  22. F. Matzkies and U. Manthe, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 4828 (1998).
  23. F. Huarte-Larrañaga and U. Manthe, J. Phys. Chem. A 105, 2522 (2001).
  24. T. Seideman and W. H. Miller, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 4412 (1992).
  25. E. Madelung, Z. Phys. 40, 322 (1926).
  26. D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 85, 166 (1952).
  27. R. E. Wyatt, Quantum Dynamics with Trajectories: Introduction to Quantum Hydrodynamics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2005).
  28. S. Garashchuk and V. A. Rassolov, Chem. Phys. Lett. 376, 358 (2003).
  29. S. Garashchuk and V. A. Rassolov, J. Chem. Phys. 121, 8711 (2004).
  30. S. Garashchuk, V. A. Rassolov, and G. C. Schatz, J. Chem. Phys. 124, 244307 (2006).
  31. S. Garashchuk and V. A. Rassolov, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 2482 (2003).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.