Journal of Chemical Physics
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Glass transition and crystallization dynamics of thin CCl2F2 films deposited on Ni(111), graphite, and water-ice films
The glass-liquid transition and crystallization of thin CCl2F2 films, as well as the influence of substrates on the phase transition of a monolayer, have been investigated using temperature-programmed...
Next Article
Kinetics of collision-induced reactions between hard-sphere reactants
We investigate the reaction kinetics of hard-sphere reactants that undergo reaction upon collision. When the reaction probability at a given collision is unity, the Noyes rate theory provides an exact...

Development, simulation, and validation of NMR relaxation-based exchange measurements

J. Chem. Phys. 131, 164502 (2009); doi:10.1063/1.3245866

Published 23 October 2009

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

R. D. Dortch,1,2 R. A. Horch,1 and M. D. Does1,2,3
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2310, USA and Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science (VUISS), Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2310, USA
2Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2310, USA
3Department of Electrical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2310, USA

Two-dimensional (2D) nuclear magnetic resonance correlation experiments have recently been proposed as a means for studying exchange in porous media. Most notable of these is the T2T2 relaxation exchange spectroscopy (REXSY) experiment. Unfortunately, quantifying exchange with this method requires a relatively long, three-dimensional acquisition. To reduce acquisition times, novel 2D methods for quantifying exchange were developed. For each method, model equations were derived (for an arbitrary N-pool system), tested via simulation studies, and validated via experimental studies in an aqueous urea model system. Results indicate that the novel methods outperform REXSY—in terms of uncertainty per unit time for the fitted exchange rate—for certain model systems. The relative merits of each method are discussed in the text. ©2009 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 10 July 2009; accepted 21 September 2009; published 23 October 2009
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/131/164502/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$24)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (360 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 76.60.Es
    Relaxation effects (condensed matter NMR)
  • 61.43.Gt
    Structure of powders and porous materials
  • YEAR: 2009

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-9606 (print)   1089-7690 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (33)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. M. K. Gallegos DP, D. M. Smith, and D. L. Stermer, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 119, 127 (1987).
  2. W. A. Stewart, A. L. Mackay, K. P. Whittall, G. R. W. Moore, and D. W. Paty, Magn. Reson. Med. 29, 767 (1993).
  3. C. L. Lawson and R. J. Hanson, Solving Least Squares Problems (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1974).
  4. K. P. Whittall and A. L. Mackay, J. Magn. Reson. 84, 134 (1989).
  5. M. H. Cohen and K. S. Mendelson, J. Appl. Phys. 53, 1127 (1982).
  6. R. S. Menon and P. S. Allen, Magn. Reson. Med. 20, 214 (1991).
  7. D. E. Woessner, J. Chem. Phys. 35, 41 (1961).
  8. P. J. McDonald, J. P. Korb, J. Mitchell, and L. Monteilhet, Phys. Rev. E 72, 011409 (2005).
  9. K. E. Washburn and P. T. Callaghan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 175502 (2006).
  10. P. J. McDonald, J. Mitchell, M. Mulheron, L. Monteilhet, and J. P. Korb, Magn. Reson. Imaging 25, 470 (2007).
  11. J. Mitchell, J. D. Griffith, J. H. Collins, A. J. Sederman, L. F. Gladden, and M. L. Johns, J. Chem. Phys. 127, 234701 (2007).
  12. L. Monteilhet, J. P. Korb, J. Mitchell, and P. J. McDonald, Phys. Rev. E 74, 061404 (2006).
  13. J. H. Lee, C. Labadie, C. S. Springer, and G. S. Harbison, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115, 7761 (1993).
  14. A. E. English, K. P. Whittall, M. L. Joy, and R. M. Henkelman, Magn. Reson. Med. 22, 425 (1991).
  15. L. Venkataramanan, S. Yi-Qiao, and M. D. Hurlimann, IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 50, 1017 (2002).
  16. R. L. Vold, E. S. Daniel, and S. O. Chan, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 92, 6771 (1970).
  17. E. G. Finer, F. Franks, and M. J. Tait, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 94, 4424 (1972).
  18. R. A. Horch and M. D. Does, Magn. Reson. Mater. Phys., Biol., Med. 20, 51 (2007).
  19. M. H. McConnell, J. Chem. Phys. 28, 430 (1958).
  20. J. R. Zimmerman and W. E. Brittin, J. Phys. Chem. 61, 1328 (1957).
  21. R. Kimmich, NMR: Tomography, Diffusometry, Relaxometry (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1997).
  22. H. Peemoeller and M. M. Pintar, J. Magn. Reson. 41, 358 (1980).
  23. J. E. M. Snaar and H. Vanas, J. Magn. Reson. 99, 139 (1992).
  24. F. R. Fenrich, C. Beaulieu, and P. S. Allen, NMR Biomed. 14, 133 (2001).
  25. S. J. Graham, P. L. Stanchev, and M. J. Bronskill, Magn. Reson. Med. 35, 706 (1996).
  26. R. M. Henkelman, X. Huang, Q. S. Xiang, G. J. Stanisz, S. D. Swanson, and M. J. Bronskill, Magn. Reson. Med. 29, 759 (1993).
  27. A. R. Travis and M. D. Does, Magn. Reson. Med. 54, 743 (2005).
  28. D. W. Marquardt, J. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math. 11, 431 (1963).
  29. T. F. Coleman and Y. Li, SIAM J. Optim. 6, 418 (1996).
  30. G. A. F. Seber and C. J. Wild, Nonlinear Regression (John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2003).
  31. K. E. Washburn and P. T. Callaghan, J. Magn. Reson. 186, 337 (2007).
  32. P. T. Callaghan, A. Coy, D. MacGowan, K. J. Packer, and F. O. Zelaya, Nature (London) 351, 467 (1991).
  33. M. F. Lin, C. Williams, M. V. Murray, G. Conn, and P. A. Ropp, J. Chromatogr., B: Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 803, 353 (2004).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.