Computing the viscosity of supercooled liquids. II. Silica and strong-fragile crossover behavior
J. Chem. Phys. 131, 164505 (2009); doi:10.1063/1.3243854
Published 27 October 2009
You are not logged in to this journal. Log in
A recently developed atomistic method capable of calculating the fragile (non-Arrhenius) temperature behavior of highly viscous liquids is further tested by studying a model of SiO2, a glass former well known for its Arrhenius temperature behavior (strong). The method predicts an Arrhenius temperature variation, in agreement with experiments, the origin of which is revealed by both quantitative and qualitative results on transition state pathways, activation barrier analysis, energy landscape connectivity, and atomistic activation mechanisms. Also predicted is a transition from fragile to strong behavior at a lower viscosity, below the range of measurements, which had been previously suggested on the basis of molecular dynamics simulations. By systematically comparing our findings with corresponding results on the binary Lennard-Jones system (fragile) we gain new insights into the topographical features of the potential energy landscape, characteristics that distinguish strong from fragile glassy systems. We interpret fragility as a universal manifestation of slowing of dynamics when the system becomes trapped in deep energy basins. As a consequence, all glass-forming systems, when cooled from their normal liquid state, should exhibit two transitions in temperature scaling of the viscosity, a strong-to-fragile crossover followed by a second transition reverting back to strong behavior.
©2009 American Institute of Physics
| History: | Received 2 February 2009; accepted 16 September 2009; published 27 October 2009 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/131/164505/1 |
KEYWORDS and PACS
RELATED DATABASES
PUBLICATION DATA
0021-9606 (print)
1089-7690 (online)
REFERENCES (27)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- C. A. Angell,
Science 267, 1924 (1995) . - J. C. Dyre, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 953 (2006).
- K. Trachenko and V. V. Brazhkin,
J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 20, 075103 (2008) . - A. Kushima, X. Lin, J. Li, J. Eapen, J. C. Mauro, X. Qian, D. Phong, and S. Yip, J. Chem. Phys. 130, 224504 (2009).
- F. H. Stillinger,
Science 267, 1935 (1995) . - C. A. Angell,
J. Phys. Chem. 97, 6339 (1993) . - B. P. Feuston and S. H. Garofalini, J. Chem. Phys. 89, 5818 (1988).
- S. Andersson and L. Dzhavadov,
J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 4, 6209 (1992) . - F. H. Stillinger and T. A. Weber, Phys. Rev. A 25, 978 (1982).
- J. C. Mauro, R. J. Loucks, J. Balakrishnan, S. Raghavan, J. Chem. Phys. 126, 194103 (2007).
- S. Sastry,
Nature (London) 409, 164 (2001) . - D. A. McQuarrie, Statistical Mechanics (Harper & Row, New York, 1973), p. 512.
- J. -P. Hansen and I. R. MacDonald, Theory of Simple Liquids (Academic, London, 1976).
- G. A. Fernandez, J. Vrabec, and H. Hasse,
Fluid Phase Equilib. 221, 157 (2004) . - J. Horbach and W. Kob, Phys. Rev. B 60, 3169 (1999).
- C. A. Angell,
J. Phys. Chem. Solids 49, 863 (1988) . - S. G. Brush, Chem. Rev. (Washington, D.C.) 63, 913 (1962).
- D. Kivelson, G. Tarjus, X. Zhao, and S. A. Kivelson, Phys. Rev. E 53, 751 (1996).
- J. Li, see: http://mt.seas.upenn.edu/Stuff/vis/Notes/main.pdf.
- F. -M. Plathe, Phys. Rev. E 59, 4894 (1999).
- B. W. H. Van Beest, G. J. Kramer, and R. A. van Santen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1955 (1990).
- G. Urbain, Y. Bottinga, and P. Richet,
Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 46, 1061 (1982) . - I. Saika-Voivod, P. H. Poole, and F. Sciortino,
Nature (London) 412, 514 (2001) . - O. M. Becker and M. Karplus, J. Chem. Phys. 106, 1495 (1997).
- D. J. Wales,
Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 25, 237 (2006) . - F. H. Stillinger, J. Chem. Phys. 88, 7818 (1988).
- J. C. Mauro, R. J. Loucks, A. K. Varshneya, and P. K. Gupta,
Sci. Model. Simul. 15, 241 (2008) .



21) complexes in aqueous solution




