Nondielectric long-range solvation of polar liquids in cubic symmetry
J. Chem. Phys. 131, 164507 (2009); doi:10.1063/1.3250941
Published 28 October 2009
You are not logged in to this journal. Log in
Long-range solvation properties of strongly coupled dipolar systems simulated using the Ewald and reaction field methods are assessed by using electric fluctuation formulas for a dielectric medium. Some components of the fluctuating electric multipole moments are suppressed, whereas other components are favored as the boundary of the simulation box is approached. An analysis of electrostatic interactions in a periodic cubic system suggests that these structural effects are due to the periodicity embedded in the Ewald method. Furthermore, the results obtained using the reaction field method are very similar to those obtained using the Ewald method, an effect which we attribute to the use of toroidal boundary conditions in the former case. Thus, the long-range solvation properties of polar liquids simulated using either of the two methods are nondielectric in their character.
©2009 American Institute of Physics
| History: | Received 4 August 2009; accepted 29 September 2009; published 28 October 2009 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/131/164507/1 |
KEYWORDS and PACS
RELATED DATABASES
PUBLICATION DATA
0021-9606 (print)
1089-7690 (online)
REFERENCES (31)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- D. Frenkel and B. Smit, Understanding Molecular Simulation, 2nd ed. (Academic, New York, 2002).
- P. J. Steinbach and B. R. Brooks,
J. Comput. Chem. 15, 667 (1994) . - P. Linse and H. C. Andersen, J. Chem. Phys. 85, 3027 (1986).
- G. Karlström, J. Stenhammar, and P. Linse,
J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 20, 494204 (2008) . - D. Levesque, G. N. Patey, and J. J. Weis,
Mol. Phys. 34, 1077 (1977) . - D. J. Adams, E. M. Adams, and G. J. Hills,
Mol. Phys. 38, 387 (1979) . - P. Ewald,
Ann. Phys. 369, 253 (1921) . - S. W. de Leeuw, J. W. Perram, and E. R. Smith,
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 373, 27 (1980) . - R. W. Hockney and J. W. Eastwood, Computer Simulations Using Particles (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1981).
- A. W. Appel,
SIAM (Soc. Ind. Appl. Math.) J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 6, 85 (1985) . - J. A. Barker and R. O. Watts,
Mol. Phys. 26, 789 (1973) . - C. J. F. Böttcher, Theory of Electric Polarization, 1st ed. (Elsevier, New York, 1952).
- D. J. Adams and I. R. McDonald,
Mol. Phys. 32, 931 (1976) . - M. Neumann,
Mol. Phys. 39, 437 (1980) . - G. Stell, N. Patey, and J. S. Høye,
Adv. Chem. Phys. 48, 183 (1981) . - T. M. Nymand and P. Linse, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 6386 (2000).
- J. Stenhammar, P. Linse, P. -Å. Malmqvist, and G. Karlström, J. Chem. Phys. 130, 124521 (2009).
- P. Linse, J. Chem. Phys. 128, 214505 (2008).
- Formally, the requirement that r1+r2<r is not fulfilled for all r1 and r2 in a cubic lattice. In our further analysis we will, however, limit ourselves to a sphere of radius a/2 centered at the origin, thus excluding the corners of the cube where the expansion breaks down from the analysis.
- H. J. C. Berendsen, J. P. M. Postma, W. F. van Gunsteren, A. DiNola, and J. R. Haak, J. Chem. Phys. 81, 3684 (1984).
- P. Linse, MOLSIM (Lund University, Sweden, 2007).
- M. Neumann,
Mol. Phys. 50, 841 (1983) . - G. Hummer, L. Pratt, A. Garcia, and M. Neumann, AIP Conf. Proc. 492, 84 (1999).
- G. Mathias and P. Tavan, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 4393 (2004).
- P. H. Hünenberger and J. A. McCammon,
Biophys. Chem. 78, 69 (1999) . - M. A. Kastenholz and P. H. Hünenberger,
J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 774 (2004) . - P. E. Smith and B. M. Pettitt, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 4289 (1996).
- F. Figueirido, G. S. Del Buono, and L. M. Levy, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 6133 (1995).
- J. P. Valleau and S. G. Whittington, Statistical Mechanics. Part A: Equilibrium Techniques (Plenum, New York, 1977), Chap. 4.
- H. L. Friedman,
Mol. Phys. 29, 1533 (1975) . - D. M. Brink and G. R. Satchler, Angular Momentum, 2nd ed. (Clarendon, Oxford, 1968).








