Journal of Chemical Physics
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Quantum dynamical effects in liquid water: A semiclassical study on the diffusion and the infrared absorption spectrum
The important role of liquid water in many areas of science from chemistry, physics, biology, geology to climate research, etc., has motivated numerous theoretical studies of its structure and dynamic...
Next Article
Ultrafast energy relaxation and anisotropy decay of the librational motion in liquid water: A molecular dynamics study
We theoretically investigate intermolecular motions in liquid water in terms of third-order infrared (IR) spectroscopy. We calculate two-dimensional (2D) IR spectra, pump-probe signals, and three-puls...

Calculation of semiclassical free energy differences along nonequilibrium classical trajectories

J. Chem. Phys. 131, 164510 (2009); doi:10.1063/1.3253799

Published 29 October 2009

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

M. F. Gelin1 and D. S. Kosov2
1Department of Chemistry, Technische Universität of München, Lichtenbergstrasse 4, D-85747 Garching, Germany
2Department of Physics and Center for Nonlinear Phenomena and Complex Systems, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Campus Plaine, CP 231, Blvd. du Triomphe, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium and Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA

We have derived several relations, which allow the evaluation of the system free energy changes in the leading order in [h-bar]2 along classically generated trajectories. The results are formulated in terms of purely classical Hamiltonians and trajectories, so that semiclassical partition functions can be computed, e.g., via classical molecular dynamics simulations. The Hamiltonians, however, contain additional potential-energy terms, which are proportional to [h-bar]2 and are temperature-dependent. We discuss the influence of quantum interference on the nonequilibrium work and problems with unambiguous definition of the semiclassical work operator. ©2009 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 30 April 2009; accepted 5 October 2009; published 29 October 2009
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/131/164510/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$24)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (126 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 65.20.Jk
    Studies of thermodynamic properties of specific liquids
  • 61.20.Ja
    Computer simulation of liquid structure
  • YEAR: 2009

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-9606 (print)   1089-7690 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (43)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. G. N. Bochkov and Y. E. Kuzovlev, Physica A 106, 443 (1981).
  2. C. Jarzynski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2690 (1997).
  3. C. Jarzynski, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. P09005 (2004).
  4. D. Andrieux, P. Gaspard, T. Monnai, and S. Tasaki, New J. Phys. 11, 043014 (2009).
  5. S. Yukawa, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 69, 2367 (2000).
  6. H. Tasaki, e-print arXiv:cond-mat/0009244v2.
  7. J. Kurchan, e-print arXiv:cond-mat/0007360v2.
  8. S. Mukamel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 170604 (2003).
  9. M. Esposito and S. Mukamel, Phys. Rev. E 73, 046129 (2006).
  10. A. E. Allahverdyan and Th. M. Nieuwenhuizen, Phys. Rev. E 71, 066102 (2005).
  11. P. Talkner, E. Lutz, and P. Hänggi, Phys. Rev. E 75, 050102(R) (2007).
  12. S. Deffner and E. Lutz, Phys. Rev. E 77, 021128 (2008).
  13. A. Engel and R. Nolte, EPL 79, 10003 (2007).
  14. H. Schröder, J. Teifel, and G. Mahler, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 151, 181 (2007).
  15. W. De Roeck and C. Maes, Phys. Rev. E 69, 026115 (2004).
  16. T. Monnai, Phys. Rev. E 72, 027102 (2005).
  17. M. F. Gelin and D. S. Kosov, Phys. Rev. E 78, 011116 (2008).
  18. M. Campisi, P. Talkner, and P. Hänggi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 210401 (2009).
  19. D. Andrieux and P. Gaspard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 230404 (2008).
  20. G. E. Crooks, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. P10023 (2008).
  21. T. Monnai and S. Tasaki, e-print arXiv:cond-mat/0308337v1.
  22. V. Chernyak and S. Mukamel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 048302 (2004).
  23. J. G. Powles and J. L. F. Abascal, J. Phys. C 16, L441 (1983).
  24. F. Barocchi, M. Neumann, and M. Zoppi, Phys. Rev. A 31, 4015 (1985).
  25. M. Hillery, R. F. O'Connell, M. O. Scully, and E. P. Wigner, Phys. Rep. 106, 121 (1984).
  26. E. Wigner, Phys. Rev. 40, 749 (1932).
  27. [integral]dprho<sub>W</sub><sup>(1)</sup>(p,q) does give the correct semiclassical distribution over coordinates.
  28. We can also interpret H(0)(beta,p,q,t) as a true classical Hamiltonian. However, it contains mixed position-momenta terms and is thus infeasible for making calculations and/or simulations.
  29. B. Roux and T. Simonson, Biophys. Chem. 78, 1 (1999).
  30. M. F. Gelin and M. Thoss, Phys. Rev. E 79, 051121 (2009).
  31. F. M. Ytreberg, R. H. Swendsen, and D. M. Zuckerman, J. Chem. Phys. 125, 184114 (2006).
  32. Definitely, the semiclassical theory does not work for h=1. We chose this value in our simulations just to get a bigger difference between the classical and semiclassical results.
  33. J. V. L. Singer and K. Singer, CCP5 Quarterly No. 14 (1984), p. 24.
  34. F. Barocchi, M. Neumann, and M. Zoppi, Phys. Rev. A 36, 2440 (1987).
  35. The difference disappears identically in the case of periodic external driving, when H(a)(pt,qt,t)=H(a)(pt,qt,0).
  36. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Statistical Physics, 3rd ed. (Pergamon, New York, 1980), Pt. 1.
  37. M. P. Allen and D. J. Tildesley, Computer Simulation of Liquids (Clarendon, Oxford, 1991).
  38. N. Tchouar, F. Ould-Kaddour, and D. Levesque, J. Chem. Phys. 121, 7326 (2004).
  39. E. Heatwole and O. V. Prezhdo, J. Chem. Phys. 126, 204108 (2007).
  40. D. Chandler and P. G. Wolynes, J. Chem. Phys. 74, 4078 (1981).
  41. T. E. Markland and D. E. Manolopoulos, J. Chem. Phys. 129, 024105 (2008).
  42. R. van Zon, L. H. de la Pena, G. H. Peslherbe, and J. Schofield, Phys. Rev. E 78, 041103 (2008).
  43. R. van Zon, L. H. de la Pena, G. H. Peslherbe, and J. Schofield, Phys. Rev. E 78, 041104 (2008).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.