Folding simulations of gramicidin A into the
-helix conformations: Simulated annealing molecular dynamics study
J. Chem. Phys. 131, 165103 (2009); doi:10.1063/1.3247578
Published 27 October 2009
You are not logged in to this journal. Log in
Gramicidin A is a linear hydrophobic 15-residue peptide which consists of alternating D- and L-amino acids and forms a unique tertiary structure, called the
6.3-helix, to act as a cation-selective ion channel in the natural conditions. In order to investigate the intrinsic ability of the gramicidin A monomer to form secondary structures, we performed the folding simulation of gramicidin A using a simulated annealing molecular dynamics (MD) method in vacuum mimicking the low-dielectric, homogeneous membrane environment. The initial conformation was a fully extended one. From the 200 different MD runs, we obtained a right-handed
4.4-helix as the lowest-potential-energy structure, and left-handed
4.4-helix, right-handed and left-handed
6.3-helix as local-minimum energy states. These results are in accord with those of the experiments of gramicidin A in homogeneous organic solvent. Our simulations showed a slight right-hand sense in the lower-energy conformations and a quite
-sheet-forming tendency throughout almost the entire sequence. In order to examine the stability of the obtained right-handed
6.3-helix and
4.4-helix structures in more realistic membrane environment, we have also performed all-atom MD simulations in explicit water, ion, and lipid molecules, starting from these
-helix structures. The results suggested that
6.3-helix is more stable than
4.4-helix in the inhomogeneous, explicit membrane environment, where the pore water and the hydrogen bonds between Trp side-chains and lipid-head groups have a role to further stabilize the
6.3-helix conformation.
©2009 American Institute of Physics
6.3-helix, to act as a cation-selective ion channel in the natural conditions. In order to investigate the intrinsic ability of the gramicidin A monomer to form secondary structures, we performed the folding simulation of gramicidin A using a simulated annealing molecular dynamics (MD) method in vacuum mimicking the low-dielectric, homogeneous membrane environment. The initial conformation was a fully extended one. From the 200 different MD runs, we obtained a right-handed
4.4-helix as the lowest-potential-energy structure, and left-handed
4.4-helix, right-handed and left-handed
6.3-helix as local-minimum energy states. These results are in accord with those of the experiments of gramicidin A in homogeneous organic solvent. Our simulations showed a slight right-hand sense in the lower-energy conformations and a quite
-sheet-forming tendency throughout almost the entire sequence. In order to examine the stability of the obtained right-handed
6.3-helix and
4.4-helix structures in more realistic membrane environment, we have also performed all-atom MD simulations in explicit water, ion, and lipid molecules, starting from these
-helix structures. The results suggested that
6.3-helix is more stable than
4.4-helix in the inhomogeneous, explicit membrane environment, where the pore water and the hydrogen bonds between Trp side-chains and lipid-head groups have a role to further stabilize the
6.3-helix conformation.
©2009 American Institute of Physics
| History: | Received 17 April 2009; accepted 22 September 2009; published 27 October 2009 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/131/165103/1 |
KEYWORDS and PACS
bioelectric phenomena,
biomembrane transport,
energy states,
hydrogen bonds,
hydrophobicity,
molecular biophysics,
molecular configurations,
molecular dynamics method,
simulated annealing
- 87.15.ap
Molecular dynamics simulation in molecular biophysics - 87.15.bg
Tertiary structure of biomolecules - 87.15.hm
Folding dynamics of biomolecules - 87.15.hp
Conformational changes of biomolecules - 36.20.Ey
Macromolecular conformation (statistics and dynamics) - 36.20.Hb
Macromolecular configuration (bonds, dimensions) - YEAR: 2009
RELATED DATABASES
PUBLICATION DATA
0021-9606 (print)
1089-7690 (online)
REFERENCES (26)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- R. E. Koeppe II and O. S. Anderson,
Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 25, 231 (1996) . - B. A. Wallace,
J. Struct. Biol. 121, 123 (1998) . - W. R. Veatch and E. R. Blout,
Biochemistry 13, 5257 (1974) . - G. E. Hawkes, L. Y. Lian, E. W. Randall, K. D. Sales, and E. H. Curzon,
Eur. J. Biochem. 166, 437 (1987) . - B. Roux, R. Bruschweiler, and R. R. Ernst,
Eur. J. Biochem. 194, 57 (1990) . - N. Abdul-Manan and J. F. Hinton,
Biochemistry 33, 6773 (1994) . - W. R. Veatch, E. T. Fossel, and E. R. Blout,
Biochemistry 13, 5249 (1974) . - A. S. Arseniev, I. L. Barsukov, V. F. Bystrov, A. L. Lomize, and Yu A. Ovchinnikov,
FEBS Lett. 186, 168 (1985) . - O. S. Andersen, R. E. Koeppe II, and B. Roux,
IEEE Trans. Nanobiosci. 4, 10 (2005) . - B. Roux and M. Karplus,
Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 23, 731 (1994) . - B. Roux,
Acc. Chem. Res. 35, 366 (2002) . - G. V. Miloshevsky and P. C. Jordan,
Biophys. J. 86, 92 (2004) . - S. Kirkpatrick, C. D. Gelatt, Jr., and M. P. Vecchi,
Science 220, 671 (1983) . - B. R. Brooks, R. E. Bruccoleri, B. D. Olafson, D. J. States, S. Swaminathan, and M. Karplus,
J. Comput. Chem. 4, 187 (1983) . - A. D. MacKerell Jr., D. Bashford, M. Bellott, R. L. Dunbrack Jr., J. D. Evanseck, M. J. Field, S. Fischer, J. Gao, H. Guo, S. Ha, D. Joseph-McCarthy, L. Kuchnir, K. Kuczera, F. T. K. Lau, C. Mattos, S. Michnick, T. Ngo, D. T. Nguyen, B. Prodhom, W. E. Reiher III, B. Roux, M. Schlenkrich, J. C. Smith, R. Stote, J. Straub, M. Watanabe, J. Wiorkiewicz-Kuczera, D. Yin, and M. Karplus,
J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 3586 (1998) . - W. G. Hoover, A. J. C. Ladd, and B. Moran, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1818 (1982).
- D. J. Evans and G. P. Morriss, Phys. Lett. 98A, 433 (1983).
- D. Brown and J. H. R. Clarke,
Mol. Phys. 51, 1243 (1984) . - L. Kalé, R. Skeel, M. Bhandarkar, R. Brunner, A. Gursoy, N. Krawetz, J. Phillips, A. Shinozaki, K. Varadarajan, and K. Schulten,
J. Comput. Phys. 151, 283 (1999) . - S. Jo, T. Kim, and W. Im,
PLoS ONE 2, e880 (2007) . - http://www.charmm-gui.org
- T. Darden, D. York, and L. Pedersen, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 10089 (1993).
- R. Fairman, S. J. Anthonycahill, and W. F. Degrado,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 5458 (1992) . - H. Monoi,
Biophys. J. 64, 36 (1993) . - W. Kabsch and C. Sander,
Biopolymers 22, 2577 (1983) . - D. Salom, E. Perez-Paya, J. Pascal, and C. Abad,
Biochemistry 37, 14279 (1998) .








