Journal of Chemical Physics
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Error and efficiency of replica exchange molecular dynamics simulations
We derive simple analytical expressions for the error and computational efficiency of replica exchange molecular dynamics (REMD) simulations (and by analogy replica exchange Monte Carlo simulations). ...
Next Article
Size, shape, and flexibility of proteins and DNA
Size, shape, and flexibility are the important topological parameters which characterize the functional specificity and different types of interactions in proteins and DNA. The size of proteins and DN...

Folding simulations of gramicidin A into the beta-helix conformations: Simulated annealing molecular dynamics study

J. Chem. Phys. 131, 165103 (2009); doi:10.1063/1.3247578

Published 27 October 2009

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Takaharu Mori1,2 and Yuko Okamoto1,2
1Department of Physics, School of Science, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8602, Japan
2Institute for Bioinfomatics Research and Development (BIRD), Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8602, Japan

Gramicidin A is a linear hydrophobic 15-residue peptide which consists of alternating D- and L-amino acids and forms a unique tertiary structure, called the beta6.3-helix, to act as a cation-selective ion channel in the natural conditions. In order to investigate the intrinsic ability of the gramicidin A monomer to form secondary structures, we performed the folding simulation of gramicidin A using a simulated annealing molecular dynamics (MD) method in vacuum mimicking the low-dielectric, homogeneous membrane environment. The initial conformation was a fully extended one. From the 200 different MD runs, we obtained a right-handed beta4.4-helix as the lowest-potential-energy structure, and left-handed beta4.4-helix, right-handed and left-handed beta6.3-helix as local-minimum energy states. These results are in accord with those of the experiments of gramicidin A in homogeneous organic solvent. Our simulations showed a slight right-hand sense in the lower-energy conformations and a quite beta-sheet-forming tendency throughout almost the entire sequence. In order to examine the stability of the obtained right-handed beta6.3-helix and beta4.4-helix structures in more realistic membrane environment, we have also performed all-atom MD simulations in explicit water, ion, and lipid molecules, starting from these beta-helix structures. The results suggested that beta6.3-helix is more stable than beta4.4-helix in the inhomogeneous, explicit membrane environment, where the pore water and the hydrogen bonds between Trp side-chains and lipid-head groups have a role to further stabilize the beta6.3-helix conformation. ©2009 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 17 April 2009; accepted 22 September 2009; published 27 October 2009
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/131/165103/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$24)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (364 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 87.15.ap
    Molecular dynamics simulation in molecular biophysics
  • 87.15.bg
    Tertiary structure of biomolecules
  • 87.15.hm
    Folding dynamics of biomolecules
  • 87.15.hp
    Conformational changes of biomolecules
  • 36.20.Ey
    Macromolecular conformation (statistics and dynamics)
  • 36.20.Hb
    Macromolecular configuration (bonds, dimensions)
  • YEAR: 2009

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-9606 (print)   1089-7690 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (26)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. R. E. Koeppe II and O. S. Anderson, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 25, 231 (1996).
  2. B. A. Wallace, J. Struct. Biol. 121, 123 (1998).
  3. W. R. Veatch and E. R. Blout, Biochemistry 13, 5257 (1974).
  4. G. E. Hawkes, L. Y. Lian, E. W. Randall, K. D. Sales, and E. H. Curzon, Eur. J. Biochem. 166, 437 (1987).
  5. B. Roux, R. Bruschweiler, and R. R. Ernst, Eur. J. Biochem. 194, 57 (1990).
  6. N. Abdul-Manan and J. F. Hinton, Biochemistry 33, 6773 (1994).
  7. W. R. Veatch, E. T. Fossel, and E. R. Blout, Biochemistry 13, 5249 (1974).
  8. A. S. Arseniev, I. L. Barsukov, V. F. Bystrov, A. L. Lomize, and Yu A. Ovchinnikov, FEBS Lett. 186, 168 (1985).
  9. O. S. Andersen, R. E. Koeppe II, and B. Roux, IEEE Trans. Nanobiosci. 4, 10 (2005).
  10. B. Roux and M. Karplus, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 23, 731 (1994).
  11. B. Roux, Acc. Chem. Res. 35, 366 (2002).
  12. G. V. Miloshevsky and P. C. Jordan, Biophys. J. 86, 92 (2004).
  13. S. Kirkpatrick, C. D. Gelatt, Jr., and M. P. Vecchi, Science 220, 671 (1983).
  14. B. R. Brooks, R. E. Bruccoleri, B. D. Olafson, D. J. States, S. Swaminathan, and M. Karplus, J. Comput. Chem. 4, 187 (1983).
  15. A. D. MacKerell Jr., D. Bashford, M. Bellott, R. L. Dunbrack Jr., J. D. Evanseck, M. J. Field, S. Fischer, J. Gao, H. Guo, S. Ha, D. Joseph-McCarthy, L. Kuchnir, K. Kuczera, F. T. K. Lau, C. Mattos, S. Michnick, T. Ngo, D. T. Nguyen, B. Prodhom, W. E. Reiher III, B. Roux, M. Schlenkrich, J. C. Smith, R. Stote, J. Straub, M. Watanabe, J. Wiorkiewicz-Kuczera, D. Yin, and M. Karplus, J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 3586 (1998).
  16. W. G. Hoover, A. J. C. Ladd, and B. Moran, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1818 (1982).
  17. D. J. Evans and G. P. Morriss, Phys. Lett. 98A, 433 (1983).
  18. D. Brown and J. H. R. Clarke, Mol. Phys. 51, 1243 (1984).
  19. L. Kalé, R. Skeel, M. Bhandarkar, R. Brunner, A. Gursoy, N. Krawetz, J. Phillips, A. Shinozaki, K. Varadarajan, and K. Schulten, J. Comput. Phys. 151, 283 (1999).
  20. S. Jo, T. Kim, and W. Im, PLoS ONE 2, e880 (2007).
  21. http://www.charmm-gui.org
  22. T. Darden, D. York, and L. Pedersen, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 10089 (1993).
  23. R. Fairman, S. J. Anthonycahill, and W. F. Degrado, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 5458 (1992).
  24. H. Monoi, Biophys. J. 64, 36 (1993).
  25. W. Kabsch and C. Sander, Biopolymers 22, 2577 (1983).
  26. D. Salom, E. Perez-Paya, J. Pascal, and C. Abad, Biochemistry 37, 14279 (1998).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.