Dual folding pathways of an
/
protein from all-atom ab initio folding simulations
J. Chem. Phys. 131, 165105 (2009); doi:10.1063/1.3238567
Published 29 October 2009
You are not logged in to this journal. Log in
Successful ab initio folding of proteins with both
-helix and
-sheet requires a delicate balance among a variety of forces in the simulation model, which may explain that the successful folding of any
/
proteins to within experimental error has yet to be reported. Here we demonstrate that it is an achievable goal to fold
/
proteins with a force field emphasizing the balance between the two major secondary structures. Using our newly developed force field, we conducted extensive ab initio folding simulations on an
/
protein full sequence design (FSD) employing both conventional molecular dynamics and replica exchange molecular dynamics in combination with a generalized-Born solvation model. In these simulations, the folding of FSD to the native state with high population (>64.2%) and high fidelity (C
-Root Mean Square Deviation of 1.29 Å for the most sampled conformation when compared to the experimental structure) was achieved. The folding of FSD was found to follow two pathways. In the major pathway, the folding started from the formation of the helix. In the minor pathway, however, folding of the
-hairpin started first. Further examination revealed that the helix initiated from the C-terminus and propagated toward the N-terminus. The formation of the hydrophobic contacts coincided with the global folding. Therefore the hydrophobic force does not appear to be the driving force of the folding of this protein.
©2009 American Institute of Physics
-helix and
-sheet requires a delicate balance among a variety of forces in the simulation model, which may explain that the successful folding of any
/
proteins to within experimental error has yet to be reported. Here we demonstrate that it is an achievable goal to fold
/
proteins with a force field emphasizing the balance between the two major secondary structures. Using our newly developed force field, we conducted extensive ab initio folding simulations on an
/
protein full sequence design (FSD) employing both conventional molecular dynamics and replica exchange molecular dynamics in combination with a generalized-Born solvation model. In these simulations, the folding of FSD to the native state with high population (>64.2%) and high fidelity (C
-Root Mean Square Deviation of 1.29 Å for the most sampled conformation when compared to the experimental structure) was achieved. The folding of FSD was found to follow two pathways. In the major pathway, the folding started from the formation of the helix. In the minor pathway, however, folding of the
-hairpin started first. Further examination revealed that the helix initiated from the C-terminus and propagated toward the N-terminus. The formation of the hydrophobic contacts coincided with the global folding. Therefore the hydrophobic force does not appear to be the driving force of the folding of this protein.
©2009 American Institute of Physics
| History: | Received 4 March 2009; accepted 7 September 2009; published 29 October 2009 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/131/165105/1 |
KEYWORDS and PACS
ab initio calculations,
hydrophobicity,
molecular biophysics,
molecular configurations,
molecular dynamics method,
proteins
- 87.15.Cc
Folding of biomolecules: thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, models and pathways - 87.15.hp
Conformational changes of biomolecules - 36.20.Ey
Macromolecular conformation (statistics and dynamics) - 87.14.E-
Proteins - 87.15.ap
Molecular dynamics simulation in molecular biophysics - 87.15.bd
Secondary structure of biomolecules - YEAR: 2009
RELATED DATABASES
PUBLICATION DATA
0021-9606 (print)
1089-7690 (online)
REFERENCES (45)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- H. Hu, M. Elstner, and J. Hermans,
Proteins 50, 451 (2003) . - T. Z. Lwin and R. Luo,
Protein Sci. 15, 2642 (2006) . - A. Suenaga, T. Narumi, N. Futatsugi, R. Yanai, Y. Ohno, N. Okimoto, and M. Taiji,
Asian J. Chem. 2, 591 (2007) . - W. X. Xu, T. F. Lai, Y. Yang, and Y. G. Mu, J. Chem. Phys. 128, 175105 (2008).
- T. Yoda, Y. Sugita, and Y. Okamoto,
Proteins: Struct., Funct., Bioinf. 66, 846 (2007) . - S. Chowdhury, M. C. Lee, G. Xiong, and Y. Duan,
J. Mol. Biol. 327, 711 (2003) . - J. W. Pitera and W. Swope,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 7587 (2003) . - C. D. Snow, B. Zagrovic, and V. S. Pande,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 14548 (2002) . - H. Lei and Y. Duan,
J. Mol. Biol. 370, 196 (2007) . - H. Lei, C. Wu, H. Liu, and Y. Duan,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 4925 (2007) . - D. R. Ripoll, J. A. Vila, and H. A. Scheraga,
J. Mol. Biol. 339, 915 (2004) . - M. Y. Shen and K. F. Freed,
Proteins 49, 439 (2002) . - H. Lei and Y. Duan,
J. Phys. Chem. B 111, 5458 (2007) . - H. Lei, C. Wu, Z. X. Wang, Y. Zhou, and Y. Duan, J. Chem. Phys. 128, 235105 (2008).
- E. D. Nelson and N. V. Grishin,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 1489 (2008) . - S. Y. Kim, J. Lee, and J. Lee,
Biophys. Chem. 115, 195 (2005) . - A. V. Rojas, A. Liwo, and H. A. Scheraga,
J. Phys. Chem. B 111, 293 (2007) . - C. A. Sarisky and S. L. Mayo,
J. Mol. Biol. 307, 1411 (2001) . - B. I. Dahiyat and S. L. Mayo,
Science 278, 82 (1997) . - H. X. Lei and Y. Duan, J. Chem. Phys. 121, 12104 (2004).
- H. X. Lei, S. G. Dastidar, and Y. Duan,
J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 22001 (2006) . - S. Jang, E. Kim, and Y. Pak,
Proteins: Struct., Funct., Bioinf. 62, 663 (2006) . - S. Y. Kim, J. Lee, and J. Lee, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 8271 (2004).
- S. Mohanty and U. H. E. Hansmann, J. Chem. Phys. 127, 035102 (2007).
- W. F. Li, J. Zhang, and W. Wang,
Proteins: Struct., Funct., Bioinf. 67, 338 (2007) . - D. A. Case, T. E. Cheatham, T. Darden, H. Gohlke, R. Luo, K. M. Merz, A. Onufriev, C. Simmerling, B. Wang, and R. J. Woods,
J. Comput. Chem. 26, 1668 (2005) . - A. Onufriev, D. Bashford, and D. A. Case,
Proteins 55, 383 (2004) . - U. H. E. Hansmann and Y. Okamoto, Phys. Rev. E 56, 2228 (1997).
- H. J. C. Berendsen, J. P. M. Postma, W. F. van Gunsteren, A. Dinola, and J. R. Haak, J. Chem. Phys. 81, 3684 (1984).
- J. P. Ryckaert, G. Ciccotti, and H. J. C. Berendsen,
J. Comput. Phys. 23, 327 (1977) . - S. J. Weiner, P. A. Kollman, D. A. Case, U. C. Singh, C. Ghio, G. Alagona, S. Profeta, and P. Weiner,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106, 765 (1984) . - W. D. Cornell, P. Cieplak, C. I. Bayly, I. R. Gould, K. M. Merz, D. M. Ferguson, D. C. Spellmeyer, T. Fox, J. W. Caldwell, and P. A. Kollman,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 5179 (1995) . - C. I. Bayly, P. Cieplak, W. D. Cornell, and P. A. Kollman,
J. Phys. Chem. 97, 10269 (1993) . - S. Miertus, E. Scrocco, and J. Tomasi,
J. Chem. Phys. 55, 117 (1981) . - R. Cammi, B. Mennucci, and J. Tomasi,
J. Phys. Chem. A 104, 5631 (2000) . - M. Cossi, G. Scalmani, N. Rega, and V. Barone, J. Chem. Phys. 117, 43 (2002).
- M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel et al., GAUSSIAN 03W, Revision B.04, Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 2003.
- Y. Duan, C. Wu, S. Chowdhury, M. C. Lee, G. M. Xiong, W. Zhang, R. Yang, P. Cieplak, R. Luo, T. Lee, J. Caldwell, J. M. Wang, and P. Kollman,
J. Comput. Chem. 24, 1999 (2003) . - A. D. MacKerell, M. Feig, and C. L. Brooks III,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 698 (2004) . - J. H. Chen, W. P. Im, and C. L. Brooks III,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 3728 (2006) . - A. D. MacKerell, D. Bashford, M. Bellott, R. L. Dunbrack, J. D. Evanseck, M. J. Field, S. Fischer, J. Gao, H. Guo, S. Ha, D. Joseph-McCarthy, L. Kuchnir, K. Kuczera, F. T. K. Lau, C. Mattos, S. Michnick, T. Ngo, D. T. Nguyen, B. Prodhom, W. E. Reiher, B. Roux, M. Schlenkrich, J. C. Smith, R. Stote, J. Straub, M. Watanabe, J. Wiorkiewicz-Kuczera, D. Yin, and M. Karplus,
J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 3586 (1998) . - S. Jang, S. Shin, and Y. Pak,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 4976 (2002) . - M. Karplus and D. L. Weaver,
Protein Sci. 3, 650 (1994) . - S. A. Islam, M. Karplus, and D. L. Weaver,
J. Mol. Biol. 318, 199 (2002) . - G. D. Rose, P. J. Fleming, J. R. Banavar, and A. Maritan,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 16623 (2006) .








