Ab initio study of the excited singlet states of all-trans
,
-diphenylpolyenes with one to seven polyene double bonds: Simulation of the spectral data within Franck–Condon approximation
J. Chem. Phys. 131, 174313 (2009); doi:10.1063/1.3261729
Published 6 November 2009
You are not logged in to this journal. Log in
Computational simulations of the electronic spectra with ab initio electronic structure calculations are presented for all-trans
,
-diphenylpolyenes with the polyene double bond number (N) from 1 to 7. A direct comparison of the fluorescence spectra of diphenylpolyenes was made between the results of highly accurate calculations and the experimental data for the systems with various chain lengths. For the realistic simulation of the emission, the total vibrational wave function was described approximately as a direct product of one-dimensional (1D) vibrational wave functions along the normal coordinates that are determined from the vibrational analysis of the ground state. The observed spectra can be reproduced in a computationally efficient way by selecting effective C–C and C=C stretching modes for the constructions of the 1D vibrational Hamiltonians. The electronic structure calculations were performed using the multireference Møller–Plesset perturbation theory with complete active space configuration interaction reference functions. Based on the vertical excitation energies computed, the lowest singlet excited state of diphenylbutadiene is shown to be the optically forbidden 2 1Ag state. The simulations of fluorescence spectra involving vibronic coupling effects reveal that the observed strong single C=C band consists of two major degenerate vibrational C=C modes for the shorter diphenylpolyenes with N=3 and 5. Further, the relative intensities of the C–C stretching modes in the fluorescence spectra tend to be larger than those of the C=C stretching modes for the systems with N over 5. This indicates that the geometric differences of the energy minima between the ground (1 1Ag) and 2 1Ag states grow larger towards the direction of the C–C stretching mode with increasing N.
©2009 American Institute of Physics
,
-diphenylpolyenes with the polyene double bond number (N) from 1 to 7. A direct comparison of the fluorescence spectra of diphenylpolyenes was made between the results of highly accurate calculations and the experimental data for the systems with various chain lengths. For the realistic simulation of the emission, the total vibrational wave function was described approximately as a direct product of one-dimensional (1D) vibrational wave functions along the normal coordinates that are determined from the vibrational analysis of the ground state. The observed spectra can be reproduced in a computationally efficient way by selecting effective C–C and C=C stretching modes for the constructions of the 1D vibrational Hamiltonians. The electronic structure calculations were performed using the multireference Møller–Plesset perturbation theory with complete active space configuration interaction reference functions. Based on the vertical excitation energies computed, the lowest singlet excited state of diphenylbutadiene is shown to be the optically forbidden 2 1Ag state. The simulations of fluorescence spectra involving vibronic coupling effects reveal that the observed strong single C=C band consists of two major degenerate vibrational C=C modes for the shorter diphenylpolyenes with N=3 and 5. Further, the relative intensities of the C–C stretching modes in the fluorescence spectra tend to be larger than those of the C=C stretching modes for the systems with N over 5. This indicates that the geometric differences of the energy minima between the ground (1 1Ag) and 2 1Ag states grow larger towards the direction of the C–C stretching mode with increasing N.
©2009 American Institute of Physics
| History: | Received 26 August 2009; accepted 20 October 2009; published 6 November 2009 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/131/174313/1 |
KEYWORDS and PACS
PUBLICATION DATA
0021-9606 (print)
1089-7690 (online)
REFERENCES (73)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- B. S. Hudson, B. E. Kohler, and K. Schulten, in Excited States, edited by E. C. Lim (Academic, New York, 1982), Vol. 6, p. 1.
- B. S. Hudson and B. E. Kohler,
Chem. Phys. Lett. 14, 299 (1972) . - K. Schulten and M. Karplus,
Chem. Phys. Lett. 14, 305 (1972) . - B. S. Hudson and B. E. Kohler, J. Chem. Phys. 59, 4984 (1973).
- M. T. Allen and D. G. Whitten,
Chem. Rev. (Washington, D.C.) 89, 1691 (1989) . - G. Orlandi, F. Zerbetto, and M. Z. Zgierski,
Chem. Rev. (Washington, D.C.) 91, 867 (1991) . - B. E. Kohler,
Chem. Rev. (Washington, D.C.) 93, 41 (1993) . - J. R. Andrews and B. S. Hudson, J. Chem. Phys. 68, 4587 (1978).
- T. Ikeyama and T. Azumi, J. Chem. Phys. 76, 5672 (1982).
- J. F. Shepanski, B. W. Keelan, and A. H. Zewail,
Chem. Phys. Lett. 103, 9 (1983) . - J. S. Horwitz, B. E. Kohler, and T. A. Spiglanin, J. Chem. Phys. 83, 2186 (1985).
- T. Itoh and B. E. Kohler,
J. Chem. Phys. 91, 1760 (1987) . - T. Itoh,
Chem. Phys. Lett. 159, 263 (1989) . - S. M. Bachilo, E. V. Bachilo, and T. Gillbro,
Chem. Phys. 229, 75 (1998) . - T. Itoh,
Chem. Phys. Lett. 342, 550 (2001) . - T. Itoh,
Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 75, 1973 (2002) . - T. Itoh,
Chem. Phys. Lett. 377, 577 (2003) . - F. Zerbetto,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 1621 (1995) . - J. F. Ye, H. Chen, R. Note, H. Mizuseki, and Y. Kawazoe,
Int. J. Quantum Chem. 107, 2006 (2007) . - C. M. Marian and N. Gilka,
J. Chem. Theory Comput. 4, 1501 (2008) . - K. Schulten, I. Ohmine, and M. Karplus, J. Chem. Phys. 64, 4422 (1976).
- P. Tavan and K. Schulten, J. Chem. Phys. 70, 5407 (1979).
- A. C. Lasaga, R. J. Aerni, and M. Karplus, J. Chem. Phys. 73, 5230 (1980).
- R. P. Hosteny, T. H. Dunning, Jr., R. R. Gilman, A. Pipano, and I. Shavitt, J. Chem. Phys. 62, 4764 (1975).
- R. J. Buenker, S. Shih, and S. D. Peyerimhoff,
Chem. Phys. Lett. 44, 385 (1976) . - L. E. McMurchie and E. R. Davidson, J. Chem. Phys. 66, 2959 (1977).
- B. R. Brooks and H. F. Schaefer III, J. Chem. Phys. 68, 4839 (1978).
- R. J. Buenker, S. -K. Shih, and S. D. Peyerimhoff,
Chem. Phys. 36, 97 (1979) . - C. Petrongolo, R. J. Buenker, and S. D. Peyerimhoff, J. Chem. Phys. 76, 3655 (1982).
- O. Kitao and H. Nakatsuji,
Chem. Phys. Lett. 143, 528 (1988) . - R. J. Cave, J. Chem. Phys. 92, 2450 (1990).
- L. Serrano-Andres, M. Merchan, I. Nebot-Gil, R. Lindh, and B. O. Roos, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 3151 (1993).
- R. J. Cave and E. R. Davidson,
J. Phys. Chem. 91, 4481 (1987) . - R. J. Cave and E. R. Davidson,
Chem. Phys. Lett. 148, 190 (1988) . - R. L. Graham and K. F. Freed, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 1304 (1992).
- L. Serrano-Andres, J. Sanchez-Marin, and I. Nebot-Gil, J. Chem. Phys. 97, 7499 (1992).
- M. A. C. Nascimento and W. A. Goddard,
Chem. Phys. Lett. 60, 197 (1979) . - M. A. C. Nascimento and W. A. Goddard,
Chem. Phys. 36, 147 (1979) . - R. J. Cave and E. R. Davidson,
J. Phys. Chem. 92, 614 (1988) . - M. Said, D. Maynau, and J. P. Malrieu,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106, 580 (1984) . - R. J. Cave and E. R. Davidson,
J. Phys. Chem. 92, 2173 (1988) . - L. Serrano-Andres, R. Lindh, B. O. Roos, and M. Merchan,
J. Phys. Chem. 97, 9360 (1993) . - W. J. Buma and F. Zerbetto, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 10492 (1995).
- F. Negri and M. Z. Zgierski, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 1298 (2001).
- P. Tavan and K. Schulten, J. Chem. Phys. 85, 6602 (1986).
- K. Hirao,
Chem. Phys. Lett. 190, 374 (1992) . - K. Hirao,
Chem. Phys. Lett. 196, 397 (1992) . - K. Hirao,
Chem. Phys. Lett. 201, 59 (1993) . - T. Hashimoto, H. Nakano, and K. Hirao, J. Chem. Phys. 104, 6244 (1996).
- Y. Kawashima, K. Nakayama, H. Nakano, and K. Hirao,
Chem. Phys. Lett. 267, 82 (1997) . - K. Nakayama, H. Nakano, and K. Hirao,
Int. J. Quantum Chem. 66, 157 (1998) . - Y. Kurashige, H. Nakano, Y. Nakao, and K. Hirao,
Chem. Phys. Lett. 400, 425 (2004) . - Y. -K. Choe, Y. Nakao, and K. Hirao, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 621 (2001).
- Y. Nakao, Y. -K. Choe, K. Nakayama, and K. Hirao,
Mol. Phys. 100, 729 (2002) . - T. Itoh, J. Chem. Phys. 123, 064302 (2005).
- G. Herzberg and E. Teller, Z. Phys. Chem. Abt. B 21, 410 (1933).
- W. H. Henneker, W. Siebrand, and M. Z. Zgierski,
Chem. Phys. Lett. 68, 5 (1979) . - W. H. Henneker, W. Siebrand, and M. Z. Zgierski, J. Chem. Phys. 79, 2495 (1983).
- F. Duschinsky, Acta Physicochim. URSS 7, 551 (1937).
- M. W. Schmidt, K. K. Baldridge, J. A. Boatz, S. T. Elbert, M. S. Gordon, J. H. Jensen, S. Koseki, N. Matsunaga, K. A. Nguyen, S. Su, T. L. Windus, M. Dupuis, and J. A. Montgomery, Jr.,
J. Comput. Chem. 14, 1347 (1993) . - M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel et al., GAUSSIAN03, Revision E.01, Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford, CT, 2004.
- G. A. Worth, M. H. Beck, A. Jäckle, and H. D. Meyer, The MCTDH package, version 8.3, University of Heidelberg, Germany, 2003.
- L. A. Sklar, B. S. Hudson, M. Petersen, and J. Diamond,
Biochemistry 16, 813 (1977) . - L. A. Heimbrook, B. E. Kohler, and T. A. Spiglanin,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 80, 4580 (1983) . - T. S. Zwier, E. Carrasquillo, and D. H. Levy, J. Chem. Phys. 78, 5493 (1983).
- B. E. Kohler and T. A. Spiglanin, J. Chem. Phys. 80, 5465 (1984).
- J. S. Horwitz, T. Itoh, B. E. Kohler, and C. W. Spangler, J. Chem. Phys. 87, 2433 (1987).
- B. E. Kohler and T. Itoh,
J. Phys. Chem. 92, 5120 (1988) . - T. Itoh, J. Chem. Phys. 119, 4516 (2003).
- T. Itoh,
J. Phys. Chem. A 111, 3502 (2007) . - T. Itoh,
Chem. Phys. Lett. 444, 226 (2007) . - V. Molina, M. Merchan, and B. O. Roos,
J. Phys. Chem. A 101, 3478 (1997) . - B. E. Kohler and J. A. Pescatore, Jr., in Conjugated Polymeric Materials: Opportunities in Electronics, Optoelectronics and Molecular Electronics, edited by J. L. Bredas and R. R. Chance (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1990), p. 353.








