Journal of Chemical Physics
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Do the interfacial fluidities of cationic reverse micelles enhance with an increase in the water content?
The role of cosurfactant and water on the interfacial fluidities of reverse micelles formed with the cationic surfactant, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) has been examined by measuring the fluor...
Next Article
Electronic states of CuPc chains on the Au(110) surface
The electronic properties of Cu-phthalocyanine (CuPc) molecules flat lying along the channels of the Au(110) reconstructed surface have been investigated by means of ultraviolet and x-ray photoelectro...

Hard repulsive barrier in hot adatom motion during dissociative adsorption of oxygen on Ag(100)

J. Chem. Phys. 131, 174709 (2009); doi:10.1063/1.3258849

Published 6 November 2009

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Ming-Feng Hsieh,1 Deng-Sung Lin,1 Heiko Gawronski,2 and Karina Morgenstern2
1Institute of Physics, National Chiao Tung University, 1001 Ta-Hsueh Road, Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan and Department of Physics, National Tsing Hua University, 101 Kuang-Fu Road Section 2, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan
2Division of Atomic and Molecular Structures (ATMOS), Institut for Solid State Physics, Leibniz University of Hannover, Appelstraße 2, D-30167 Hannover, Germany

Random pairing simulation and low temperature scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) are used to investigate the detailed O2 dissociative adsorption processes at 200 K for various coverages. The distribution of oxygen adatoms shows a strong repulsion between the adsorbates with a radius of ~0.8  nm. The comparison between STM results and simulation reveals two prominent pairing distances of 2 and 4 nm and their branching ratio is about 2:1. These findings shed new light on the origin of the large intrapair distances found and on the process behind the empirical “eight-site rule.” ©2009 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 18 June 2009; accepted 14 October 2009; published 6 November 2009
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/131/174709/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$24)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (452 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 68.43.Mn
    Adsorption kinetics
  • 82.30.Lp
    Decomposition chemical reactions (pyrolysis, dissociation, and fragmentation)
  • YEAR: 2009

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-9606 (print)   1089-7690 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (33)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. C. S. A. Fang, Surf. Sci. 235, L291 (1990).
  2. P. A. Gravil, D. M. Bird, and J. A. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3933 (1996).
  3. F. B. de Mongeot, A. Cupolillo, U. Valbusa, and M. Rocca, Chem. Phys. Lett. 270, 345 (1997).
  4. S. Schintke, S. Messerli, K. Morgenstern, J. Nieminen, and W. -D. Schneider, J. Chem. Phys. 114, 4206 (2001).
  5. J. R. Hahn and W. Ho, J. Chem. Phys. 123, 214702 (2005).
  6. M. Alducin, H. F. Busnengo, and R. D. Muino, J. Chem. Phys. 129, 224702 (2008).
  7. V. I. Bukhtiyarov, V. V. Kaichev, E. A. Podgornov, and I. P. Prosvirin, Catal. Lett. 57, 233 (1999).
  8. R. J. Beuhler, R. M. Rao, J. Hrbek, and M. G. White, J. Phys. Chem. B 105, 5950 (2001).
  9. G. Cipriani, D. Loffreda, A. Dal Corso, S. de Gironcoli, and S. Baroni, Surf. Sci. 501, 182 (2002).
  10. I. Costina, M. Schmid, H. Schiechl, M. Gajdos, A. Stierle, S. Kumaragurubaran, J. Hafner, H. Dosch, and P. Varga, Surf. Sci. 600, 617 (2006).
  11. L. A. Peyser, A. E. Vinson, A. P. Bartko, and R. M. Dickson, Science 291, 103 (2001).
  12. O. Citri, R. Baer, and R. Kosloff, Surf. Sci. 351, 24 (1996).
  13. M. Schmidt, A. Masson, and C. Brechignac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 243401 (2003).
  14. S. Messerli, S. Schintke, K. Morgenstern, J. Nieminen, and W. -D. Schneider, Chem. Phys. Lett. 328, 330 (2000).
  15. M. Rocca, L. Savio, L. Vattuone, U. Burghaus, V. Palomba, N. Novelli, F. Buatier de Mongeot, U. Valbusa, R. Gunnella, G. Comelli, A. Baraldi, S. Lizzit, and G. Paolucci, Phys. Rev. B 61, 213 (2000).
  16. A. F. Carley, P. R. Davies, and M. W. Roberts, Catal. Lett. 80, 25 (2002).
  17. J. Wintterlin, R. Schuster, and G. Ertl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 123 (1996).
  18. U. Diebold, W. Hebenstreit, G. Leonardelli, M. Schmid, and P. Varga, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 405 (1998).
  19. M. K. Rose, A. Borg, J. C. Dunphy, T. Mitsui, D. F. Ogletree, and M. Salmeron, Surf. Sci. 561, 69 (2004).
  20. T. Zambelli, J. V. Barth, J. Wintterlin, and G. Ertl, Nature (London) 390, 495 (1997).
  21. C. R. Brundle, J. Behm, and J. A. Barker, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2, 1038 (1984).
  22. M. Mehlhorn, H. Gawronski, L. Nedelmann, A. Grujic, and K. Morgenstern, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 78, 033905 (2007).
  23. K. Morgenstern, K. -F. Braun, and K. -H. Rieder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 226801 (2002).
  24. M. Todorova, W. X. Li, M. V. Ganduglia-Pirovano, C. Stampfl, K. Reuter, and M. Scheffler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 096103 (2002).
  25. L. Qi, X. Qian, and J. Li, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 146101 (2008).
  26. C. Q. Sun, Appl. Surf. Sci. 246, 6 (2005).
  27. F. E. Olsson, N. Lorente, and M. Persson, Surf. Sci. 522, L27 (2003).
  28. M. Dean and M. Bowker, Appl. Surf. Sci. 35, 27 (1988).
  29. P. H. F. Reijnen, A. Raukema, U. van Slooten, and A. W. Kleyn, Surf. Sci. 253, 24 (1991).
  30. G. C. Poon, T. J. Grassman, J. C. Gumy, and A. C. Kummel, J. Chem. Phys. 119, 9818 (2003).
  31. G. Katz, R. Kosloff, and Y. Zeiri, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 3931 (2004).
  32. Y. Zeiri, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 3408 (2000).
  33. G. Katz, Y. Zeiri, and R. Kosloff, J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 18876 (2005).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.