Skip navigation.

  ASMEDL.ORG »  Journals »  J. Eng. Mater. Technol. »  Volume 116 »  pp. 556
Adjust text size: Decrease font size Increase font size

Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology
Volume: Page/CID:

Previous Article
The Compliance Method for Measurement of Near Surface Residual Stresses—Analytical Background
Introducing a thin cut from the surface of a part containing residual stresses produces a change in strain on the surface. When the strains are measured as a function of the depth of the cut, residual...
Next Article
Data Management for the Evaluation of Residual Stresses by the Incremental Hole-Drilling Method
The semidestructive incremental hole-drilling method commonly used to evaluate residual stresses is exceedingly sensitive to experimental errors, with sensitivity increasing as hole depth increases. T...

The Compliance Method for Measurement of Near Surface Residual Stresses—Application and Validation for Surface Treatment by Laser and Shot-Peening

J. Eng. Mater. Technol.  -- October 1994 --  Volume 116,  Issue 4, 556 (5 pages)
doi:10.1115/1.2904328

You are not logged into the ASME Digital Library.
Log in

Author(s):
W. Cheng and I. Finnie
Mechanical Engineering Department, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 94720

M. Gremaud
Departement des Matériaux, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland

A. Rosselet
Mechanical Technology, Sulzer-Innotec, 8401 Winterthur, Switzerland

R. D. Streit
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550
Residual stresses due to surface treatment are measured using the compliance method. The method makes use of the strains measured on the surface while a cut is extended progressively along a plane of interest. The experimental results for a shot peened specimen show good agreement with those obtained by the X-ray method. This experiment demonstrates that the compliance method is accurate and capable of measuring residual stresses which vary rapidly over a depth of less than 50 µm. Good general agreement with results by the X-ray method is also obtained for a laser treated specimen. Some advantages and disadvantages of the present method relative to hole-drilling, layer removal and X-ray methods are discussed.

©1994 The American Society of Mechanical Engineers

History: Received May 20, 1993; revised June 1993
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.2904328

PUBLICATION DATA

Coden:
JEMTA8
ISSN:
0094-4289 (print)   1528-8889 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef ASME

There are no references.

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.