Skip navigation.

  ASMEDL.ORG »  Journals »  J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power »  Volume 132 »  pp. 41602
Adjust text size: Decrease font size Increase font size

Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
Volume: Page/CID:

Previous Article
Jet Engine Health Signal Denoising Using Optimally Weighted Recursive Median Filters
The removal of noise and outliers from health signals is an important problem in jet engine health monitoring. Typically, health signals are time series of damage indicators, which can be sensor measu...
Next Article
Experimental Analysis of a Waveguide Pressure Measuring System
An infinite-line probe is commonly used to measure unsteady pressure in high-temperature environments while protecting the pressure transducer. In this study, an existing theoretical model is used to ...

A Fault Diagnosis Method for Industrial Gas Turbines Using Bayesian Data Analysis

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power  -- April 2010 --  Volume 132,  Issue 4, 041602 (6 pages)
doi:10.1115/1.3204508

You are not logged into the ASME Digital Library.
Log in

Author(s):
Young K. Lee, Dimitri N. Mavris, and Vitali V. Volovoi
School of Aerospace Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0150

Ming Yuan
School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0205

Ted Fisher
Service Engineering, GE Energy, Atlanta, GA 30339-8402
This paper presents an offline fault diagnosis method for industrial gas turbines in a steady-state. Fault diagnosis plays an important role in the efforts for gas turbine owners to shift from preventive maintenance to predictive maintenance, and consequently to reduce the maintenance cost. Ever since its birth, numerous techniques have been researched in this field, yet none of them is completely better than the others and perfectly solves the problem. Fault diagnosis is a challenging problem because there are numerous fault situations that can possibly happen to a gas turbine, and multiple faults may occur in multiple components of the gas turbine simultaneously. An algorithm tailored to one fault situation may not perform well in other fault situations. A general algorithm that performs well in overall fault situations tends to compromise its accuracy in the individual fault situation. In addition to the issue of generality versus accuracy, another challenging aspect of fault diagnosis is that, data used in diagnosis contain errors. The data is comprised of measurements obtained from gas turbines. Measurements contain random errors and often systematic errors like sensor biases as well. In this paper, to maintain the generality and the accuracy together, multiple Bayesian models tailored to various fault situations are implemented in one hierarchical model. The fault situations include single faults occurring in a component, and multiple faults occurring in more than one component. In addition to faults occurring in the components of a gas turbine, sensor biases are explicitly included in the multiple models so that the magnitude of a bias, if any, can be estimated as well. Results from these multiple Bayesian models are averaged according to how much each model is supported by data. Gibbs sampling is used for the calculation of the Bayesian models. The presented method is applied to fault diagnosis of a gas turbine that is equipped with a faulty compressor and a biased fuel flow sensor. The presented method successfully diagnoses the magnitudes of the compressor fault and the fuel flow sensor bias with limited amount of data. It is also shown that averaging multiple models gives rise to more accurate and less uncertain results than using a single general model. By averaging multiple models, based on various fault situations, fault diagnosis can be general yet accurate.

©2010 American Society of Mechanical Engineers

History: Received 4 March 2009; revised 2 June 2009; published 15 January 2010
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.3204508

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 84.70.+p
    High-current and high-voltage technology: power systems; power transmission lines and cables
  • YEAR: 2010

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

Coden:
JETPEZ
ISSN:
0742-4795 (print)   1528-8919 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef ASME

REFERENCES (18)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.