Skip navigation.

  ASMEDL.ORG »  Journals »  J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power »  Volume 132 »  pp. 42902
Adjust text size: Decrease font size Increase font size

Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
Volume: Page/CID:

Previous Article
Postirradiation Testing of High Temperature Reactor Spherical Fuel Elements Under Accident Conditions
A new furnace for accident condition testing of spherical high temperature reactor fuel elements has been installed and now operates in the hot cells of the Institute for Transuranium Elements (ITU) K...
Next Article
An Experimental Study on Air-Water Two-Phase Flow Patterns in Pebble Beds
An experimental study was conducted on the air-water two-phase flow patterns in the bed of rectangular cross sections containing spheres of regular distribution. Three kinds of glass spheres with diff...

Integration of Nuclear Energy Into Oil Sands Projects

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power  -- April 2010 --  Volume 132,  Issue 4, 042902 (8 pages)
doi:10.1115/1.3098421

You are not logged into the ASME Digital Library.
Log in

Author(s):
Ashley E. Finan and Andrew C. Kadak, Professor
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
Energy security and greenhouse gas reduction are thought to be two of the most urgent priorities for sustaining and improving the human condition in the near future. Few places pit the two goals so directly in opposition to one another as the Alberta oil sands. Here, Canadian natural gas is burned in massive quantities to extract oil from one of North America's largest native sources of carbon-intensive heavy oil. However, this conflict need not continue. Nonemitting nuclear energy can replace natural gas as a fuel source in an economical and more environmentally sound way. This would allow for the continued extraction of transportation fuels without greenhouse gas emissions, while freeing up the natural gas supply for hydrogen feedstock and other valuable applications. Bitumen production in Alberta expanded dramatically in the past 5 years as the price of oil rose to record levels. This paper explores the feasibility and economics of using nuclear energy to power future oil sands production and upgrading activities, and puts forth several nuclear energy application scenarios for providing steam and electricity to in situ and surface mining operations. This review includes the Enhanced CANDU 6, the Advanced CANDU Reactor, and the pebble bed modular reactor. Based on reasonable projections of available cost information, steam produced using nuclear energy is expected to be less expensive than steam produced by natural gas at current natural gas prices and at prices above $6.50/MMBtu (CAD). For electricity production, nuclear energy becomes competitive with natural gas plants at gas prices of $10–13/MMBtu (CAD). Costs of constructing nuclear plants in Alberta are affected by higher local labor costs, which this paper took into account in making these estimates. Although a more definitive analysis of construction costs and project economics will be required to confirm these findings, there appears to be sufficient merit in the potential economics to support further study.

©2010 American Society of Mechanical Engineers

History: Received 11 November 2008; revised 22 November 2008; published 22 January 2010
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.3098421

KEYWORDS and PACS

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

Coden:
JETPEZ
ISSN:
0742-4795 (print)   1528-8919 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef ASME

REFERENCES (50)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.