Skip navigation.

  ASMEDL.ORG »  Journals »  J. Heat Transfer »  Volume 132 »  pp. 31601
Adjust text size: Decrease font size Increase font size

Journal of Heat Transfer
Volume: Page/CID:

Previous Article
Flow Boiling Visualization of R-134a in a Vertical Channel of Small Diameter
The present work reports on flow boiling visualization of refrigerant R-134a in a vertical circular channel with an internal diameter of 1.33 mm and 235 mm in heated length. A quartz tube with a homog...
Next Article
A Hybrid Method for Measuring Heat Flux
The development and evaluation of a novel hybrid method for obtaining heat flux measurements is presented. By combining the spatial and temporal temperature measurements of a heat flux sensor, the tim...

Convection Calibration of Schmidt–Boelter Heat Flux Gauges in Stagnation and Shear Air Flow

J. Heat Transfer  -- March 2010 --  Volume 132,  Issue 3, 031601 (9 pages)
doi:10.1115/1.3211866

You are not logged into the ASME Digital Library.
Log in

Author(s):
A. Gifford, A. Hoffie, T. Diller, Fellow ASME; and S. Huxtable
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061
Experiments were performed to characterize the performance of Schmidt–Boelter heat flux gauges in stagnation and shear convective air flows. The gauges were of a standard design (25.4 mm and 38 mm in diameter), using a copper heat sink with water cooling channels around the active sensing element. A simple model of the gauges using an internal thermal resistance between the sensor surface and the heat sink is used to interpret the results. The model predicts a nonlinear dependence of the gauge sensitivity as a function of the heat transfer coefficient. Experimental calibration systems were developed to simultaneously measure the heat flux gauge response relative to a secondary standard under the same flow and thermal conditions. The measured gauge sensitivities in the stagnation flow matched the model, and were used to estimate the value of the internal thermal resistance for each of the four gauges tested. For shear flow, the effect of the varying gauge surface temperature on the boundary layer was included. The results matched the model with a constant factor of 15–25% lower effective heat transfer coefficient. When the gauge was water cooled, the effect of the internal thermal resistance of the gauge was markedly different for the two flow conditions. In the stagnation flow, the internal resistance further decreased the apparent gauge sensitivity. Conversely, in shear flow, the resistance was effectively offset by the cooler heat sink of the gauge, and the resulting sensitivities were nearly the same as, or larger than, for radiation.

©2010 American Society of Mechanical Engineers

History: Received 1 December 2008; revised 6 July 2009; published 22 December 2009
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.3211866

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 47.55.P-
    Buoyancy-driven flows; convection
  • 47.27.N-
    Wall-bounded shear flow turbulence
  • 89.20.Kk
    Engineering
  • YEAR: 2010

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

Coden:
JHTRAO
ISSN:
0022-1481 (print)   1528-8943 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef ASME

REFERENCES (10)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.