Inhomogenizations and Complex Representations
Real Lie-algebra inhomogenizations are considered for complex defining representations and some emphasis is devoted to the case when the defining representation is irreducible. A theorem is given conc...
Real Lie-algebra inhomogenizations are considered for complex defining representations and some emphasis is devoted to the case when the defining representation is irreducible. A theorem is given conc...
Exact Quantization Conditions
The method of Froman and Froman for proving exact quantization conditions is reviewed. This formalism, unlike the usual WKB approximation to which it bears a close resemblance, requires consideration ...
The method of Froman and Froman for proving exact quantization conditions is reviewed. This formalism, unlike the usual WKB approximation to which it bears a close resemblance, requires consideration ...
Ising-Model Spin Correlations
J. Math. Phys. 9, 836 (1968); doi:10.1063/1.1664650
Issue Date: June 1968
You are not logged in to this journal. Log in
In this paper we study a class of planar Ising lattices which have two or more directions along which the pair-correlation function admits a Toeplitz determinant representation. On the basis of the recently developed theory of Toeplitz determinants, we discuss the asymptotic behavior of these correlations at the critical point.
©1968 The American Institute of Physics
| History: | Received 11 November 1967 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?JMAPAQ/9/836/1 |
Connotea
CiteULike
del.icio.us
BibSonomy
REFERENCES (27)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- T. T. Wu, Phys. Rev. 149, 380 (1966).
- Since we only deal with pair correlations we simply refer to them as correlations.
- E. W. Montroll, R. B. Potts, and J. C. Ward, J. Math. Phys. 4, 308 (1963).
- H. S. Green,
Z. Physik 171, 129 (1963) . - M. E. Fisher, Phys. Rev. 113, 969 (1959).
- R. E. Hartwig, Australian J. Math. (to be published).
- J. Stephenson, J. Math. Phys. 5, 1009 (1964).
- L. P. Kadanoff, Nuovo Cimento 44, 276 (1966).
- B. Kaufman and L. Onsager, Phys. Rev. 76, 1244 (1949).
- M. E. Fisher,
Physica 25, 521 (1959) . - H. Stillinger and H. L. Frisch,
Physica 27, 751 (1961) . - C. Domb, Advan. Phys. 9, Nos.34, 35 (1960).
- R. E. Hartwig and J. Stephenson, “A Note on Ising Model Spin-Correlations” (unpublished, 1965), in which essentially the same conjecture (2.6) was made and the verification of the Ornstein-Zernike law (2.2) above the critical point was also indicated.
- R. E. Hartwig, J. Math. Phys. 7, 286 (1966).
- J. Stephenson, J. Math. Phys. 7, 1123 (1966).
- H. S. Green and C. A. Hurst, Order-Disorder Phenomena (Interscience Publishers Inc., London, 1964).
- For convenience all the constant factors in the definition of R and R* have been omitted.
- A. E. Ferdinand, Ph.D. thesis, University of London (1967).
- M. E. Fisher and A. E. Ferdinand, Phys. Rev. Letters 19, 169 (1967).
- C. A. Hurst, J. Chem. Phys. 38, 2558 (1963).
- See Ref. 16, Sec. 5.3.
- T. Utiyama, Progr. Theoret. Phys. (Kyoto) 6, 907 (1951).
- T. Yamamoto, Progr. Theoret. Phys. (Kyoto) 6, 533 (1951).
- V. G. Vaks, A. I. Larkin, and Yu. N. Ovchinnikov, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 49, 1180 (1965)
- M. E. Fisher, J. Math. Phys. 4, 278 (1963).
- See Ref. 16, Eq. (5.70).
- In Ref. 4, Eq. (80), z1 and z3 should be interchanged with z2 and z4, respectively, and in Eq. (17) the second term should read g1g3
2.
