Journal of Mathematical Physics
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Convergence of unitary and complex decompositions of exponential operators
The convergence of the fractal unitary and complex decompositions of exponential operators is proved for Hermitian operators in a Banach space.
Next Article
Comment on ``The nonsingular spiked harmonic oscillator'' [J. Math. Phys. 34, 437 (1993)]

Finslerian structures: The Cartan–Clifton method of the moving frame

J. Math. Phys. 34, 4898 (1993); doi:10.1063/1.530331

Issue Date: October 1993

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

José G. Vargas and Douglas G. Torr
Department of Physics, Optics Building 300F, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, Alabama 35899
A theory of Finslerian structures is presented using an unpublished method of Clifton. It consists of using Cartan's moving frame method with fields of special bases, and the Cartan calculus of tensor-valued forms with nonredundant coordinates on sphere bundles (which are the base spaces of the Finsler bundles). The formulation only requires a modicum of new concepts and does not involve Lagrangians at any fundamental level, including the definitions of metrics and connections. Finslerian connections on Riemannian (and even flat) metrics are discussed. The invariant forms of the sphere bundle of Minkowski space are obtained. The possibility of describing equations of motion through autoparallels, rather than extremals, is illustrated. Journal of Mathematical Physics is copyrighted by The American Institute of Physics.
History: Received 14 January 1993; accepted 5 June 1993
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JMAPAQ/34/4898/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$24)
Download PDF (1375 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 02.90.+p
    Mathematical methods in physics Other topics in mathematical methods in physics
  • 02.40.Ma
    Mathematical methods in physics Geometry, differential geometry, and topology Global differential geometry
  • 02.40.Hw
    Mathematical methods in physics Geometry, differential geometry, and topology Classical differential geometry
  • 04.20.Cv
    Relativity and gravitation General relativity Fundamental problems and general formalism
  • YEAR: 1993

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0022-2488 (print)   1089-7658 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (27)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. M. Matsumoto, Foundations of Finsler Geometry and Special Finsler Spaces (Kaiseisha, Shigaken, 1986).
  2. A. Bejancu, Finsler Geometry and Applications (Ellis Horwood, Chichester, England, 1990).
  3. R. S. Ingarden, Tensor, N. S. 30, 201 (1976).
  4. H. Ishikawa, J. Math. Phys. 22, 995 (1981).
  5. G. S. Asanov, Finsler Geometry, Relativity, and Gauge Theories (Reidel, Boston, 1985).
  6. H. Rund, Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 26, 148 (1992).
  7. Clifton claims, and we concur with him, that this presentation of Finsler geometry is the one that Cartan might have developed himself if he had used the exterior calculus on the Finsler bundle (defined in Sec. IV) in his Finsler monograph: É. Cartan, Exposés de Géométrie, Series Actualités Scientifiques et Industrielles, Vol. 79 (1934);
  8. Reprinted (Hermann, Paris, 1971).
  9. G. Randers, Phys. Rev. 59, 195 (1941).
  10. A. Lichnerowicz, Theories Relativistes de la Gravitation et de I'Electromagnetism (Masson, Paris, 1955).
  11. R. G. Beil, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 26, 189 (1987).
  12. H. Rund, The Differential Geometry of Finsler Spaces (Springer, New York, 1959).
  13. P. Finsler, Uüber Kurven und Flächen in Allgemeinen Räumen (Dissertation, Göttingen, 1918);
  14. Reprinted: (Birkhäuser, Basel, 1951).
  15. É. Cartan, Comptes R. Acad. Sci. 174, 625 (1922).
  16. Translation: “... the ds2 does not contain all the geometric essence of the space. ... the space may be analytically defined by its equations of structure.”
  17. C. Ehresmann, Colloque de Topologie (Bruxelles, 1950), pp. 29–55.
  18. S. Kobayashi and K. Nomizu, Foundations of Differential Geometry (Interscience, New York, 1963), Vol. 1, p. 287.
  19. We borrow the term normal from Cartan to designate a connection that is uniquely determined by a given mathematical object and/or a procedure.
  20. For details, see Ref. 1.
  21. R. Miron, J. Math. Kyoto Univ. 23, 219 (1983).
  22. S. Watanabe and F. Ikeda, Tensor, N. S. 39, 37 (1982).
  23. M. Anastasiei, Models of Finsler and Lagrange Geometry, Proceedings of the Fourth National Seminar on Finsler and Lagrange Spaces (Societatea de Stinte Matematice Din R. S., Universitatea din Brasov, Romania, 1986), pp. 43–56.
  24. To be precise, Cartan uses this term to refer to the system (1) of differential equations. We hope that it will always be clear from the context which meaning applies in each use of the term in this article.
  25. If the torsion had not been of type R and/or the metric not Riemannian, compatibility conditions between torsion and metric would have to be taken into account. This problem will be considered at length in a forthcoming article.
  26. See, for instance, J. A. Schouten, Ricci Calculus (Springer, Berlin, 1954).
  27. For the solution in terms of forms and the moving frame approach, see, J. G. Vargas, Found. Phys. 21, 379 (1991).
  28. The reader may prefer to reach the same conclusion by proceeding in reverse: the vector of components Uµ at x=x0 is a special vector at s = (x0,ui = Ui/U0).
  29. C. Moller, The Theory of Relativity (Cambridge University, Cambridge, England, 1969).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.