Journal of Mathematical Physics
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Sharp thresholds of blow-up and global existence for the coupled nonlinear Schrödinger system
In this paper, we establish two new types of invariant sets for the coupled nonlinear Schrödinger system in the Euclidean n-space n and derive two sharp thresholds of blow-up and global existence...
Next Article
Higher entropic uncertainty relations for anti-commuting observables
Uncertainty relations provide one of the most powerful formulations of the quantum mechanical principle of complementarity. Yet, very little is known about such uncertainty relations for more than two...

Purely squeezed states for quantum deformed systems

J. Math. Phys. 49, 062104 (2008); doi:10.1063/1.2939392

Published 19 June 2008

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

A. N. F. Aleixo1 and A. B. Balantekin2
1Instituto de Física, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 25725232, Brazil
2Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA

The generalized purely squeezed states for primary shape-invariant potentials systems, quantum deformed by different models, are constructed by the ladder-operator method within an algebraic approach based on supersymmetric quantum mechanics. The characteristic properties of these states as well as their quantum statistical properties and squeezing effects for generalized quadrature observables are studied and analyzed in terms of the quantum deformation parameter q. An application is given for a quantum deformed Pöschl–Teller potential system, and numerical results are presented and discussed in detail. ©2008 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 27 February 2008; accepted 15 May 2008; published 19 June 2008; publisher error corrected 8 August 2008
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JMAPAQ/49/062104/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$28)
Download PDF (1127 kB) View Cart

ERRATUM

  1. Publisher's Note: “Purely squeezed states for quantum deformed systems” [J. Math. Phys. 49, 062104 (2008)]
    A. N. F. Aleixo et al.
    J. Math. Phys. 49, 089901 (2008)

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 03.65.Fd
    Algebraic methods in quantum mechanics
  • 05.30.-d
    Quantum statistical mechanics
  • YEAR: 2008

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0022-2488 (print)   1089-7658 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (32)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. E. H. Kennard, Z. Phys. 44, 326 (1927).
  2. D. Stoler, Phys. Rev. D 1, 3217 (1970);
  3. 4, 1925 (1974);
    P. H. Yuen, Phys. Rev. A 13, 2226 (1976);
    Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 719 (1983);
    I. Fujiwara and K. Miyoshi, Prog. Theor. Phys. 64, 715 (1980);
    V. V. Dodonov, E. V. Kurmyshev, and V. I. Man'ko, Phys. Lett. 79A, 150 (1980);
    P. A. K. Rajogopal and J. T. Marshall, Phys. Rev. A 26, 2977 (1982).
  4. For a review from this period, see M. M. Nieto, Frontiers of Nonequilibrium Statistical Physics, edited by G. T. Moore and M. O. Scully (Plenum, New York 1986), p. 287.
  5. C. M. Caves, J. S. Thorne, R. W. P. Drever, V. D. Sandberg, and M. Zimmerman, Rev. Mod. Phys. 52, 341 (1980).
  6. J. N. Hollenhorst, Phys. Rev. D 19, 1669 (1979).
  7. See e. g. , R. Loudon and P. L. Knight, J. Mod. Opt. 34, 809 (1987).
  8. M. Artori, J. Zang, and J. L. Birman, Phys. Rev. A 47, 2555 (1993).
  9. A. Solomon and J. Katriel, J. Phys. A 23, L1209 (1990).
  10. R. J. McDermott. and A. I. Solomon, J. Phys. A 27, L15 (1994).
  11. P. Osland and J.-Z. Zhang, Ann. Phys. (Paris) 290, 45 (2001).
  12. B. Aneva, Eur. Phys. J. C 31, 403 (2003).
  13. R. Roknizadeh and M. K. Tavassoly, J. Phys. A 37, 5649 (2004).
  14. M. T. Batchelor, L. Mezincescu, R. I. Nepomechie, and V. Rittenberg, J. Phys. A 23, L141 (1990);
  15. H. Grosse, S. Pallua, P. Prester, and V. Raschhofer, ibid. 27 4761 (1994);
    M. R. Ubriaco, Phys. Rev. E 55, 291 (1997).
  16. R. Barbier, J. Meyer, and M. Kibler, J. Phys. G 20, L13 (1994);
  17. M. Angelova, V. K. Dobrev, and A. Frank, J. Phys. A 34, L503 (2001).
  18. D. Bonatsos and C. Daskaloyannis, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 43, 537 (1990).
  19. M. Chaichian, D. Ellinas, and P. Kulish, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 980 (1990);
  20. V. Buzek, J. Mod. Opt. 39, 949 (1992);
    L. M. Kuang, ibid. 41, 517 (1994);
    K. P. Marzlin, Int. J. Thermophys. 36, 841 (1997);
    C. Zhe, Phys. Rev. A 47, 5017 (1993).
  21. L. Alvarez-Gaume, C. Gomez, and G. Sierra, Phys. Lett. B 220, 142 (1989);
  22. Nucl. Phys. B 330, 347 (1990).
  23. A. B. Balantekin, Phys. Rev. A 57, 4188 (1998).
  24. A. N. F. Aleixo, A. B. Balantekin, and M. A. Cândido Ribeiro, Phys. Rev. A 36, 011631 (2003).
  25. S. Chaturvedi, R. Dutt, A. Gangopadhyay, P. Panigrahi, C. Rasinariu, and U. Sukhatme, Phys. Lett. A 248, 109 (1998).
  26. M. G. Benedict and B. Molnár, Phys. Rev. A 60, R1737 (1999).
  27. A. B. Balantekin, M. A. Cândido Ribeiro, and A. N. F. Aleixo, J. Phys. A 32, 2785 (1999).
  28. A. N. F. Aleixo, A. B. Balantekin, and M. A. Cândido Ribeiro, J. Phys. A 33, 1503 (2000).
  29. C. Chuan, J. Phys. A 24, L1165 (1991).
  30. A. N. F. Aleixo, A. B. Balantekin, and M. A. Cândido Ribeiro, J. Appl. Phys. 35, 9063 (2002).
  31. A. Khare, and U. Sukhatme, J. Phys. A 26, L901 (1993);
  32. D. Barclay, R. Dutt, A. Gangopadhyaya, A. Khare, A. Pagnamenta, and U. Sukhatme, Phys. Rev. A 48, 2786 (1993).
  33. M. Arik and D. D. Coon, J. Math. Phys. 17, 524 (1976).
  34. A. N. F. Aleixo and A. B. Balantekin, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40, 5105 (2007).
  35. A. N. F. Aleixo and A. B. Balantekin, J. Phys. A 38, 8603 (2005).
  36. G. Pöschl and E. Teller, Z. Phys. 83, 143 (1933).
  37. F. Cooper, A. Khare, and U. Sukhatme, Phys. Rep. 251, 267 (1995).
  38. A. N. F. Aleixo and A. B. Balantekin, J. Phys. A 40, 3463 (2007).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.