Skip navigation.

  ASMEDL.ORG »  Journals »  J. Turbomach. »  Volume 132 »  pp. 11016
Adjust text size: Decrease font size Increase font size

Journal of Turbomachinery
Volume: Page/CID:

Previous Article
Web-Based, Interactive Laboratory Experiment in Turbomachine Aerodynamics
Remote laboratory exercises are gaining popularity due to advances in communication technologies along with the need to provide realistic yet flexible educational tools for tomorrow's engineers. Labor...
Next Article
Letterbox Trailing Edge Heat Transfer: Effects of Blowing Rate, Reynolds Number, and External Turbulence on Heat Transfer and Film Cooling Effectiveness
Heat transfer and film cooling distributions have been acquired for a vane trailing edge with letterbox partitions. Additionally, pressure drop data have been experimentally determined across a pin fi...

Effects of Reynolds Number and Freestream Turbulence Intensity on the Unsteady Boundary Layer Development on an Ultra-High-Lift Low Pressure Turbine Airfoil

J. Turbomach.  -- January 2010 --  Volume 132,  Issue 1, 011016 (10 pages)
doi:10.1115/1.3106031

You are not logged into the ASME Digital Library.
Log in

Author(s):
Xue Feng Zhang
Gas Turbine Laboratory, Institute for Aerospace Research, National Research Council Canada, M-10, 1200 Montreal Road, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0R6, Canada

Howard Hodson
Whittle Laboratory, Department of Engineering, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0DY, England
The effects of Reynolds numbers and the freestream turbulence intensities (FSTIs) on the unsteady boundary layer development on an ultra-high-lift low-pressure turbine airfoil, so-called T106C, are investigated. The measurements were carried out at both Tu=0.5% and 4.0% within a range of Reynolds numbers, based on the blade chord and the isentropic exit velocity, between 100,000 and 260,000. The interaction between the unsteady wake and the boundary layer depends on both the strength of the wake and the status of the boundary layer. At Tu=0.5%, both the wake's high turbulence and the negative jet behavior of the wake dominate the interaction between the unsteady wake and the separated boundary layer on the suction surface of the airfoil. Since the wake turbulence cannot induce transition before separation on this ultra-high-lift blade, the negative jet of the wake has the opportunity to induce a rollup vortex. At Tu=4.0%, the time-mean separation on the suction surface is much smaller. With elevated FSTI, the turbulence in the wake just above the boundary layer is no longer distinguishable from the background turbulence level. The unsteady boundary layer transition is dominated by the wake's negative jet induced boundary layer variation.

©2010 American Society of Mechanical Engineers

History: Received 18 November 2008; revised 18 December 2008; published 18 September 2009
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.3106031

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 89.20.Kk
    Engineering
  • 47.20.Ib
    Instability of boundary layers; flow separation
  • 47.32.C-
    Vortex dynamics
  • 47.27.W-
    Boundary-free shear flow turbulence
  • YEAR: 2010

PUBLICATION DATA

Coden:
JOTUEI
ISSN:
0889-504X (print)   1528-8900 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef ASME

REFERENCES (18)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.