Previous Article
Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. I. Modulation transfer function
The modulation transfer function (MTF) and the noise power spectrum (NPS) are widely recognized as the most relevant metrics of resolution and noise performance in radiographic imaging. These quantiti...
Next Article
Intraoperative radiation therapy using mobile electron linear accelerators: Report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 72
Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) has been customarily performed either in a shielded operating suite located in the operating room (OR) or in a shielded treatment room located within the Depart...

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. II. Noise power spectrum

Med. Phys. Volume 33, Issue 5, pp. 1466-1475 (May 2006)

Published 28 April 2006
Buy This PDF   (US$28)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (124 kB) View Cart

EDITORIALLY RELATED

  1. Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. I. Modulation transfer function
    Ehsan Samei et al.
    Med. Phys. 33, 1454 (2006)

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 87.59.Hp
    Digital radiography (medical imaging)
  • 87.57.Ce
    Medical image quality: contrast, resolution, noise, etc
  • YEAR: 2006

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0094-2405 (print)  
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AAPM
James T. Dobbins, III
Duke Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27710

Ehsan Samei
Duke Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Departments of Radiology, Biomedical Engineering, and Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27710

Nicole T. Ranger
Duke Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27710

Ying Chen
Duke Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27710
Second in a two-part series comparing measurement techniques for the assessment of basic image quality metrics in digital radiography, in this paper we focus on the measurement of the image noise power spectrum (NPS). Three methods were considered: (1) a method published by Dobbins et al. [Med. Phys. 22, 1581–1593 (1995)], (2) a method published by Samei et al. [Med. Phys. 30, 608–622 (2003)], and (3) a new method sanctioned by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC 62220-1, 2003), developed as part of an international standard for the measurement of detective quantum efficiency. In addition to an overall comparison of the estimated NPS between the three techniques, the following factors were also evaluated for their effect on the measured NPS: horizontal versus vertical directional dependence, the use of beam-limiting apertures, beam spectrum, and computational methods of NPS analysis, including the region-of-interest (ROI) size and the method of ROI normalization. Of these factors, none was found to demonstrate a substantial impact on the amplitude of the NPS estimates (<=3.1% relative difference in NPS averaged over frequency, for each factor considered separately). Overall, the three methods agreed to within 1.6%±0.8% when averaged over frequencies >0.15  mm–1. ©2006 American Association of Physicists in Medicine
History: Received 8 April 2005; accepted 17 February 2006; published 28 April 2006
Permalink: http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.2188819

REFERENCES (26)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.