Previous Article
MO-D-224A-02: Clinical Experience in Using EPID for Quantitative Verification of IMRT Dose Distributions
Purpose: The purpose of this work is to investigate the advantages of using an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) as part of our clinical IMRT QA procedure. We present our experience with the qua...
Next Article
MO-D-224A-04: EPID Transmission Dosimetry for QA Use in Adaptive Radiotherapy
Purpose: Radiotherapy patients treated for H&N cancer often lose weight and have shrinkage of their tumors causing drastic anatomical changes. This can result in changes in dose distribution with ...

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

MO-D-224A-03: Dependence of Planar IMRT QA On MLC Positional Inaccuracies

Med. Phys. Volume 33, Issue 6, pp. 2167-2167 (June 2006)

Issue Date: June 2006
Buy This PDF   (US$28)
Download PDF (4168 kB) View Cart

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0094-2405 (print)  
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AAPM
E Ahunbay, P Jursinic, and XA Li
Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukeee, WI
Purpose: This work aims to investigate the sensitivity of IMRT QA done by means of planar dosimetry to MLC positional inaccuracies. Also we propose an accurate method for measurement of MLC positioning errors using the 2D diode array. Methods: A method to measure the MLC position errors by using 2D-arrary of 455 diodes (MapCheck, Sun Nuclear) is developed. Our method utilizes the fact that each diode's signal will be most sensitive to the MLC position error when its center coincides with the edge of a MLC leaf where a small deviation from the accurate position produces sharp increase or decrease in the diode output. We designed various multi-segmented test patterns based on this principle that can evaluate the MLC deviations with sub-mm accuracy at multiple MLC banks simultaneously. By using this information as a deviation histogram, we created deliberately erroneous IMRT fields with varying standard deviations of MLC leaf position error. MapCHECK planar dose analysis is performed and the sensitivity of the IMRT QA procedure to MLC position inaccuracy using MapCHECK device is evaluated. Results: Our results indicate that for SIEMENS Primus and MD machines, the MLC positional errors show a standard deviation of about +/– 0.7mm. Right after the MLC calibration, this deviation might reduce to 0.55mm. It has been found that a single leaf position can vary by as much as 1mm between two consecutive measurements. Fields with less number of segments that are generated by Direct Aperture Optimization are found to be less sensitive to these errors by measurements with deliberately modified fields with random MLC inaccuracies. Conclusion: A method to accurately quantify MLC position is proposed and used to obtain a distribution of leaf position errors for many leaves at multiple banks. The sensitivity of planar dosimeter to the MLC positioning errors is investigated. ©2006 American Association of Physicists in Medicine

There are no references.

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.