Physics of Plasmas
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Computer studies on the spontaneous fast reconnection mechanism in three dimensions
The spontaneous evolution of fast reconnection is studied in three dimensions by extending (in the z direction) the previous two-dimensional model that considered only the x-y plane [M. Ugai, Phys. Fl...
Next Article
Statistical description and transport in stochastic magnetic fields
The statistical description of particle motion in a stochastic magnetic field is presented. Starting form the stochastic Liouville equation (or, hybrid kinetic equation) associated with the equations ...

Fluid models for kinetic effects on coherent nonlinear Alfvén waves. I. Fundamental theory

Phys. Plasmas 3, 863 (1996); doi:10.1063/1.871790

Issue Date: March 1996

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

M. V. Medvedev and P. H. Diamond
Department of Physics, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0319
Collisionless regime kinetic models for coherent nonlinear Alfvén wave dynamics are studied using fluid moment equations with an approximate closure anzatz. Resonant particle effects are modeled by incorporating an additional term representing dissipation akin to parallel heat conduction. Unlike collisional dissipation, parallel heat conduction is presented by an integral operator. The modified derivative nonlinear Schrödinger equation thus has a spatially nonlocal nonlinear term describing the long-time evolution of the envelope of parallel-propagating Alfvén waves, as well. Coefficients in the nonlinear terms are free of the (1−beta)−1 singularity usually encountered in previous analyses, and have a very simple form that clarifies the physical processes governing the large-amplitude Alfvénic nonlinear dynamics. The nonlinearity appears via coupling of an Alfvénic mode to a kinetic ion-acoustic mode. Damping of the nonlinear Alfvén wave appears via strong Landau damping of the ion-acoustic wave when the electron-to-ion temperature ratio is close to unity. For a (slightly) obliquely propagating wave, there are finite Larmor radius corrections in the dynamical equation. This effect depends on the angle of wave propagation relative to B0 and vanishes for the limit of strictly parallel propagation. Explicit magnetic perturbation envelope equations amenable to further analysis and numerical solution are obtained. Implications of these models for collisionless shock dynamics are discussed. ©1996 American Institute of Physics.
History: Received 27 September 1995; accepted 4 December 1995
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?PHPAEN/3/863/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$28)
Download PDF (244 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 52.30.-q
    Physics of plasmas and electric discharges Plasma flow; magnetohydrodynamics
  • 52.35.Mw
    Physics of plasmas and electric discharges Waves, oscillations, and instabilities in plasma Nonlinear waves and nonlinear wave propagation (including parametric effects, mode coupling, ponderomotive effects, etc.)
  • 96.50.Ek
    Solar system Interplanetary space Solar wind interactions with planets, satellites, and comets
  • YEAR: 1996

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
1070-664X (print)   1089-7674 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (32)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. B. T. Tsurutani and E. J. Smith, Geophys. Res. Lett. 13, 263 (1986).
  2. B. T. Tsurutani and P. Rodriguez, J. Geophys. Res. 86, 4319 (1981).
  3. R. Z. Sagdeev and C. F. Kennel, Sci. Am. No. 4, 106 (1991).
  4. R. H. Cohen and R. M. Kulsrud, Phys. Fluids 17, 2215 (1974).
  5. A. Rogister, Phys. Fluids 14, 2733 (1971).
  6. E. Mjølhus, and J. Wyller, J. Plasma Phys. 40, 299 (1988).
  7. E. Mjo.lhus, J. Plasma Phys. 19, 437 (1978).
  8. S. R. Spangler, J. P. Sheerin, and G. L. Payne, Phys. Fluids 28, 104 (1985).
  9. S. P. Dawson and C. F. Fontan, Phys. Fluids 31, 83 (1988).
  10. M. Longtin and B. U. Ö. Sonnerup, J. Geophys. Res. 91, 6816 (1986).
  11. H. K. Wong and M. L. Goldstein, J. Geophys. Res. 91, 5671 (1986).
  12. E. Mjølhus and J. Wyller, Phys. Scr. 33, 442 (1986).
  13. S. R. Spangler, Phys. Fluids B 1, 1738 (1989).
  14. S. R. Spangler, Phys. Fluids B 2, 407 (1989).
  15. G. S. Lee and P. H. Diamond, Phys. Fluids 29, 3291 (1986).
  16. R. E. Waltz, Phys. Fluids 31, 1963 (1988).
  17. G. W. Hammett and F. W. Perkins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 3019 (1990).
  18. C. L. Hedrick and J.-N. Leboeuf, Phys. Fluids B 4, 3915 (1992).
  19. W. Dorland and G. W. Hammett, Phys. Fluids B 5, 812 (1993).
  20. S. E. Parker, W. Dorland, R. A. Santoro, M. A. Beer, Q. P. Liu, W. W. Lee, and G. W. Hammet, Phys. Plasmas 1, 1461 (1994).
  21. A. Brizard, Phys. Fluids B 4, 1213 (1992).
  22. L. A. Artsimovich and R. Z. Sagdeev, Fizika Plazmy dlya Fizikov (Plasma Physics for Physicists) (Atomizdat, Moskva, 1979), p. 75.
  23. C. F. Kennel, B. Buti, T. Hada, and R. Pellat, Phys. Fluids 30, 1949 (1988).
  24. S. R. Spangler and B. B. Plapp, Phys. Fluids B 4, 3356 (1992).
  25. T. Hada, C. F. Kennel, and B. Buti, J. Geophys. Res. 94, 65 (1989).
  26. S. Ghosh and K. Papadopoulos, Phys. Fluids 30, 1371 (1987).
  27. S. R. Spangler, Phys. Fluids 29, 2535 (1986).
  28. K. Mio, T. Ogino, K. Minami, and S. Takeda, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 41, 667 (1976).
  29. T. Flå, E. Mjølhus, and J. Wyller, Phys. Scr. 40, 219 (1989).
  30. L. Spitzer, Diffusive Matter in Space (Interscience, New York, 1968).
  31. A. V. Gruzinov and P. H. Diamond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1651 (1994).
  32. A. V. Gruzinov and P. H. Diamond, Phys. Plasmas 2, 1941 (1995).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.