Physics of Plasmas
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Damping of toroidal ion temperature gradient modes
The temporal evolution of linear toroidal ion temperature gradient (ITG) modes is studied based on a kinetic integral equation including an initial condition. It is shown how to evaluate the analytic ...
Next Article
Anomalous and neoclassical transport suppression by the radial electric field, induced by Alfvén waves in tokamaks
The suppression of anomalous transport and/or reduction of neoclassical transport caused by the Alfvén-wave-induced shear of the radial electric field in tokamaks is investigated. The simple qu...

Feedback stabilization of resistive shell modes in a reversed field pinch

Phys. Plasmas 6, 3536 (1999); doi:10.1063/1.873614

Issue Date: September 1999

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

R. Fitzpatrick and E. P. Yu
Institute for Fusion Studies, Department of Physics, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712-1060
A reactor relevant reversed field pinch (RFP) must be capable of operating successfully when surrounded by a close-fitting resistive shell whose L/R time is much shorter than the pulse length. Resonant modes are largely unaffected by the shell resistivity, provided that the plasma rotation is maintained against the breaking effect of nonaxisymmetric eddy currents induced in the shell. This may require an auxiliary momentum source, such as a neutral beam injector. Nonresonant modes are largely unaffected by plasma rotation, and are expected to manifest themselves as nonrotating resistive shell modes growing on the L/R time of the shell. A general RFP equilibrium is subject to many simultaneously unstable resistive shell modes; the only viable control mechanism for such modes in a RFP reactor is active feedback. It is demonstrated than an N-fold toroidally symmetric arrangement of feedback coils, combined with a strictly linear feedback algorithm, is capable of simultaneously stabilizing all intrinsically unstable resistive shell modes over a wide range of different RFP equilibria. The number of coils in the toroidal direction N, at any given poloidal angle, must be greater than, or equal to, the range of toroidal mode numbers of the unstable resistive shell modes. However, this range is largely determined by the aspect-ratio of the device. The optimum coil configuration corresponds to one in which each feedback coil slightly overlaps its immediate neighbors in the toroidal direction. The critical current which must be driven around each feedback coils is, at most, a few percent of the equilibrium toroidal plasma current. The feedback scheme is robust to small deviations from pure N-fold toroidal symmetry or a pure linear response of the feedback circuits. ©1999 American Institute of Physics.
History: Received 26 January 1999; accepted 2 June 1999
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?PHPAEN/6/3536/1

Submit to JRSE

BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$28)
Download PDF (142 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 52.55.Ez
    Physics of plasmas and electric discharges Magnetic confinement and equilibrium Z-Pinch, theta pinch, plasma focus and other pinch devices
  • 52.30.-q
    Physics of plasmas and electric discharges Plasma flow; magnetohydrodynamics
  • 52.35.Py
    Physics of plasmas and electric discharges Waves, oscillations, and instabilities in plasma Plasma macroinstabilities (hydromagnetic, e.g., kink, fire-hose, mirror, ballooning, tearing, trapped-particle, flute, Rayleigh–Taylor, etc.)
  • 52.35.Qz
    Physics of plasmas and electric discharges Waves, oscillations, and instabilities in plasma Plasma microinstabilities (ion-acoustic, two-stream, loss-cone, beam-plasma, drift, ion- or electron-cyclotron, etc.)
  • 52.25.Fi
    Physics of plasmas and electric discharges Plasma properties Transport properties
  • 28.52.Av
    Nuclear engineering and nuclear power studies Fusion reactors Theory, design, and computerized simulation
  • YEAR: 1999

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
1070-664X (print)   1089-7674 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (31)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. J. A. Wesson and D. J. Campbell, Tokamaks, 2nd ed. (Clarenden, Oxford, England, 1998).
  2. H. A. B. Bodin, Nucl. Fusion 30, 1717 (1990).
  3. J. B. Taylor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 1139 (1974).
  4. D. C. Robinson, Nucl. Fusion 18, 939 (1978).
  5. Y. L. Ho and S. C. Prager, Phys. Fluids 31, 1673 (1988).
  6. Z. X. Jiang, A. Bondeson, and R. Paccagnella, Phys. Plasmas 2, 442 (1995).
  7. S. Ortolani and D. D. Schnack, Magnetohydrodynamics of Plasma Relaxation (World Scientific, Singapore, 1993).
  8. M. F. F. Nave and J. A. Wesson, Nucl. Fusion 30, 2575 (1990).
  9. T. C. Hender, C. G. Gimblett, and D. C. Robinson, Nucl. Fusion 29, 1279 (1989).
  10. R. Fitzpatrick, Nucl. Fusion 33, 1049 (1993).
  11. J. P. Goedbloed, D. Pfirsch, and H. Tasso, Nucl. Fusion 12, 649 (1972).
  12. M. Tanaka, T. Tuda, and T. Takeda, Nucl. Fusion 13, 199 (1973).
  13. T. Sometani and K. Fukagawa, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 17, 2035 (1978).
  14. G. F. Nalesso and S. Costa, Nucl. Fusion 20, 443 (1980).
  15. J. P. Friedberg (private communication, 1995).
  16. T. Tamano, W. D. Bard, C. Chu et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1444 (1987).
  17. B. Alper, M. K. Bevir, H. A. B. Bodin et al., Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 31, 205 (1989).
  18. P. Brunsell, J. R. Drake, S. Mazur, and P. Nordlund, Phys. Scr. 44, 358 (1991).
  19. P. Greene and S. Robertson, Phys. Fluids B 5, 556 (1993).
  20. J. Drake (private communication, 1998).
  21. C. M. Bishop, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 31, 1179 (1994).
  22. R. Fitzpatrick and T. H. Jensen, Phys. Plasmas 3, 2641 (1996).
  23. R. Fitzpatrick, Phys. Plasmas 4, 2519 (1997).
  24. R. Fitzpatrick and E. P. Yu, Phys. Plasmas 5, 2340 (1998).
  25. B. Alper, Phys. Fluids B 2, 1338 (1990).
  26. E. J. Zita, S. C. Prager, Y. L. Ho, and D. D. Schnack, Nucl. Fusion 32, 1941 (1992).
  27. The standard large aspect-ratio ordering is R0/a >> 1, where R0 and a are the major and minor radii of the plasma, respectively.
  28. The conventional definition of this parameter is beta = 2µ0<p>/<B2>, where <[centered ellipsis]> denotes a volume average, p is the plasma pressure, and B is the magnetic field strength.
  29. V. Antoni, D. Merlin, S. Ortolani, and R. Paccagnella, Nucl. Fusion 26, 1711 (1986).
  30. W. A. Newcomb, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 10, 232 (1960).
  31. R. Fitzpatrick, Phys. Plasmas 6, 1168 (1999).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.