Feedback stabilization of resistive shell modes in a reversed field pinch
Phys. Plasmas 6, 3536 (1999); doi:10.1063/1.873614
Issue Date: September 1999
You are not logged in to this journal. Log in
A reactor relevant reversed field pinch (RFP) must be capable of operating successfully when surrounded by a close-fitting resistive shell whose L/R time is much shorter than the pulse length. Resonant modes are largely unaffected by the shell resistivity, provided that the plasma rotation is maintained against the breaking effect of nonaxisymmetric eddy currents induced in the shell. This may require an auxiliary momentum source, such as a neutral beam injector. Nonresonant modes are largely unaffected by plasma rotation, and are expected to manifest themselves as nonrotating resistive shell modes growing on the L/R time of the shell. A general RFP equilibrium is subject to many simultaneously unstable resistive shell modes; the only viable control mechanism for such modes in a RFP reactor is active feedback. It is demonstrated than an N-fold toroidally symmetric arrangement of feedback coils, combined with a strictly linear feedback algorithm, is capable of simultaneously stabilizing all intrinsically unstable resistive shell modes over a wide range of different RFP equilibria. The number of coils in the toroidal direction N, at any given poloidal angle, must be greater than, or equal to, the range of toroidal mode numbers of the unstable resistive shell modes. However, this range is largely determined by the aspect-ratio of the device. The optimum coil configuration corresponds to one in which each feedback coil slightly overlaps its immediate neighbors in the toroidal direction. The critical current which must be driven around each feedback coils is, at most, a few percent of the equilibrium toroidal plasma current. The feedback scheme is robust to small deviations from pure N-fold toroidal symmetry or a pure linear response of the feedback circuits. ©1999 American Institute of Physics.
| History: | Received 26 January 1999; accepted 2 June 1999 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?PHPAEN/6/3536/1 |
KEYWORDS and PACS
FEEDBACK,
REVERSE-FIELD PINCH,
STABILIZATION,
PLASMA INSTABILITY,
PLASMA CONFINEMENT,
CHARGED-PARTICLE TRANSPORT THEORY,
reversed field pinch,
plasma flow,
plasma transport processes,
fusion reactor theory
- 52.55.Ez
Physics of plasmas and electric discharges Magnetic confinement and equilibrium Z-Pinch, theta pinch, plasma focus and other pinch devices - 52.30.-q
Physics of plasmas and electric discharges Plasma flow; magnetohydrodynamics - 52.35.Py
Physics of plasmas and electric discharges Waves, oscillations, and instabilities in plasma Plasma macroinstabilities (hydromagnetic, e.g., kink, fire-hose, mirror, ballooning, tearing, trapped-particle, flute, RayleighTaylor, etc.) - 52.35.Qz
Physics of plasmas and electric discharges Waves, oscillations, and instabilities in plasma Plasma microinstabilities (ion-acoustic, two-stream, loss-cone, beam-plasma, drift, ion- or electron-cyclotron, etc.) - 52.25.Fi
Physics of plasmas and electric discharges Plasma properties Transport properties - 28.52.Av
Nuclear engineering and nuclear power studies Fusion reactors Theory, design, and computerized simulation - YEAR: 1999
RELATED DATABASES
PUBLICATION DATA
1070-664X (print)
1089-7674 (online)
REFERENCES (31)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- J. A. Wesson and D. J. Campbell, Tokamaks, 2nd ed. (Clarenden, Oxford, England, 1998).
- H. A. B. Bodin,
Nucl. Fusion 30, 1717 (1990) . - J. B. Taylor,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 1139 (1974) . - D. C. Robinson,
Nucl. Fusion 18, 939 (1978) . - Y. L. Ho and S. C. Prager, Phys. Fluids 31, 1673 (1988).
- Z. X. Jiang, A. Bondeson, and R. Paccagnella, Phys. Plasmas 2, 442 (1995).
- S. Ortolani and D. D. Schnack, Magnetohydrodynamics of Plasma Relaxation (World Scientific, Singapore, 1993).
- M. F. F. Nave and J. A. Wesson,
Nucl. Fusion 30, 2575 (1990) . - T. C. Hender, C. G. Gimblett, and D. C. Robinson,
Nucl. Fusion 29, 1279 (1989) . - R. Fitzpatrick,
Nucl. Fusion 33, 1049 (1993) . - J. P. Goedbloed, D. Pfirsch, and H. Tasso,
Nucl. Fusion 12, 649 (1972) . - M. Tanaka, T. Tuda, and T. Takeda, Nucl. Fusion 13, 199 (1973).
- T. Sometani and K. Fukagawa,
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 17, 2035 (1978) . - G. F. Nalesso and S. Costa,
Nucl. Fusion 20, 443 (1980) . - J. P. Friedberg (private communication, 1995).
- T. Tamano, W. D. Bard, C. Chu et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1444 (1987).
- B. Alper, M. K. Bevir, H. A. B. Bodin et al.,
Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 31, 205 (1989) . - P. Brunsell, J. R. Drake, S. Mazur, and P. Nordlund,
Phys. Scr. 44, 358 (1991) . - P. Greene and S. Robertson, Phys. Fluids B 5, 556 (1993).
- J. Drake (private communication, 1998).
- C. M. Bishop,
Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 31, 1179 (1994) . - R. Fitzpatrick and T. H. Jensen, Phys. Plasmas 3, 2641 (1996).
- R. Fitzpatrick, Phys. Plasmas 4, 2519 (1997).
- R. Fitzpatrick and E. P. Yu, Phys. Plasmas 5, 2340 (1998).
- B. Alper, Phys. Fluids B 2, 1338 (1990).
- E. J. Zita, S. C. Prager, Y. L. Ho, and D. D. Schnack,
Nucl. Fusion 32, 1941 (1992) . - The standard large aspect-ratio ordering is R0/a
1, where R0 and a are the major and minor radii of the plasma, respectively. - The conventional definition of this parameter is
= 2µ0
p
/
B2
, where 
![[centered ellipsis]](http://scitation.aip.org/stockgif2/cellip.gif)
denotes a volume average, p is the plasma pressure, and B is the magnetic field strength. - V. Antoni, D. Merlin, S. Ortolani, and R. Paccagnella,
Nucl. Fusion 26, 1711 (1986) . - W. A. Newcomb,
Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 10, 232 (1960) . - R. Fitzpatrick, Phys. Plasmas 6, 1168 (1999).








