An experiment to test centrifugal confinement for fusion
Phys. Plasmas 8, 2057 (2001); doi:10.1063/1.1350957
Issue Date: May 2001
You are not logged in to this journal. Log in
The basic idea of centrifugal confinement is to use centrifugal forces from supersonic rotation to augment conventional magnetic confinement. Optimizing this "knob" results in a fusion device that features four advantages: steady state, no disruptions, superior cross-field confinement, and a simpler coil configuration. The idea rests on two prongs: first, centrifugal forces can confine plasmas to desired regions of shaped magnetic fields; second, the accompanying large velocity shear can stabilize even magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) instabilities. A third feature is that the velocity shear also viscously heats the plasma; no auxiliary heating is necessary to reach fusion temperatures. Regarding transport, the velocity shear can also quell microturbulence, leading to fully classical confinement, as there are no neoclassical effects. Classical parallel electron transport then sets the confinement time. These losses are minimized by a large Pastukhov factor resulting from the deep centrifugal potential well: at Mach 45, the Lawson criterion is accessible. One key issue is whether velocity shear will be sufficient by itself to stabilize MHD interchanges. Numerical simulations indicate that laminar equilibria can be obtained at Mach numbers of 45 but that the progression toward laminarity with increasing Mach number is accompanied by residual convection from the interchanges. The central goal of the Maryland Centrifugal Torus (MCT) [R. F. Ellis et al., Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 44, 48 (1998)] is to obtain MHD stability from velocity shear. As an assist to accessing laminarity, MCT will incorporate two unique features: plasma elongation and toroidal magnetic field. The former raises velocity shear efficiency, and modest magnetic shear should suppress residual convection. ©2001 American Institute of Physics.
| History: | Received 20 October 2000; accepted 21 December 2000 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?PHPAEN/8/2057/1 |
KEYWORDS and PACS
plasma toroidal confinement,
plasma magnetohydrodynamics,
plasma instability,
plasma heating,
plasma transport processes,
plasma turbulence,
plasma simulation,
fusion reactor operation,
fusion reactor instrumentation
- 52.55.Hc
Physics of plasmas and electric discharges Magnetic confinement and equilibrium Stellarators, torsatrons, heliacs, bumpy tori, and other toroidal confinement devices - 52.30.Cv
Physics of plasmas and electric discharges Plasma dynamics and flow Magnetohydrodynamics (including electron magnetohydrodynamics) - 52.25.Fi
Physics of plasmas and electric discharges Plasma properties Transport properties - 52.35.Ra
Physics of plasmas and electric discharges Waves, oscillations, and instabilities in plasmas and intense beams Plasma turbulence - 52.35.Py
Physics of plasmas and electric discharges Waves, oscillations, and instabilities in plasmas and intense beams Macroinstabilities (hydromagnetic, e.g., kink, fire-hose, mirror, ballooning, tearing, trapped-particle, flute, Rayleigh-Taylor, etc.) - 52.50.-b
Physics of plasmas and electric discharges Plasma production and heating - 52.65.Kj
Physics of plasmas and electric discharges Plasma simulation Magnetohydrodynamic and fluid equation - 28.52.Lf
Nuclear engineering and nuclear power studies Fusion reactors Components and instrumentation - YEAR: 2001
RELATED DATABASES
PUBLICATION DATA
1070-664X (print)
1089-7674 (online)
REFERENCES (26)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- K. Boyer, J. E. Hammel, C. L. Longmire, D. Nagle, R. Ribe, and W. B. Riesenfeld, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy (United Nations, Geneva, 1958), Vol. 31, p. 319.
- B. Lehnert,
Nucl. Fusion 11, 485 (1971) . - G. F. Abdrashitov, A. V. Beloborodov, V. I. Volosov, V. V. Kubarev, Y. S. Popov, and Y. N. Yudin,
Nucl. Fusion 31, 1275 (1991) . - A. B. Hassam, Comments Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 18, 275 (1997).
- R. F. Ellis, A. B. Hassam, S. Guharay, S. Messer, and B. R. Osborn, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 44, 48 (1998).
- E. Hamieri, Phys. Fluids 26, 230 (1983).
- A. B. Hassam,
Nucl. Fusion 36, 707 (1996) . - B. R. Osborn, R. F. Ellis, and A. B. Hassam, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 43, 1719 (1998).
- D. J. Griffiths, Introduction to Electrodynamics (PrenticeHall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1989).
- R. J. Goldston and P. H. Rutherford, Introduction to Plasma Physics (Institute of Physics Publishing, Philadelphia, 1995).
- S. I. Braginskii, Rev. Plasma Phys. 1, 205 (1965).
- V. P. Pastukhov,
Nucl. Fusion 14, 3 (1974) . - J. P. Freidberg, Ideal Magnetohydrodynamics (Plenum, New York, 1987).
- A. B. Hassam, Phys. Plasmas 6, 3772 (1999).
- H. Biglari, P. H. Diamond, and P. W. Terry, Phys. Fluids B 2, 1 (1990).
- A. B. Hassam, Phys. Fluids B 4, 485 (1992).
- B. Lehnert, Phys. Fluids 9, 1367 (1966).
- R. Groebner, Phys. Fluids B 5, 2343 (1993).
- A. B. Hassam, T. M. Antonsen, J. F. Drake, P. N. Guzdar, C. S. Liu, D. R. McCarthy, and F. L. Waelbroeck, Phys. Fluids B 5, 2519 (1993).
- S. DeSouza-Machado, A. B. Hassam, and R. Sina, Phys. Plasmas 7, 4632 (2000).
- A. G. Fiksel, A. F. Almagri, D. Craig, M. Tida, S. C. Prager, and J. Sarff,
Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 5, 78 (1996) . - S. P. Kuo, Phys. Fluids 6, 195 (1963).
- A. B. Hassam, Phys. Plasmas 6, 3738 (1999).
- E. P. Velikhov, Sov. Phys. JETP 36, 848 (1959).
- S. Chandrasekhar, Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Stability (Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, 1961).
- D. Goel and A. B. Hassam, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 45, 211 (2000).








