Control of tearing modes in toroidal fusion experiments using "designer" error fields
Phys. Plasmas 8, 2760 (2001); doi:10.1063/1.1365956
Issue Date: June 2001
You are not logged in to this journal. Log in
It is demonstrated that a magnetic island chain formed by a saturated tearing instability in a toroidal magnetic fusion device can lock to a special class of externally generated magnetic perturbation in a stabilizing phase. The theoretical apparatus needed to design such perturbations is outlined. These special perturbationswhich are termed "designer" error fieldscould be used to control the amplitudes of tearing modes in toroidal magnetic fusion experiments without the requirement of fast phase modulation. This type of control would be far more feasible in a reactor environment than conventional active feedback control via external magnetic perturbations. ©2001 American Institute of Physics.
| History: | Received 17 October 2000; accepted 20 February 2001 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?PHPAEN/8/2760/1 |
KEYWORDS and PACS
- 52.35.Py
Physics of plasmas and electric discharges Waves, oscillations, and instabilities in plasmas and intense beams Macroinstabilities (hydromagnetic, e.g., kink, fire-hose, mirror, ballooning, tearing, trapped-particle, flute, Rayleigh-Taylor, etc.) - 52.55.-s
Physics of plasmas and electric discharges Magnetic confinement and equilibrium - YEAR: 2001
RELATED DATABASES
PUBLICATION DATA
1070-664X (print)
1089-7674 (online)
REFERENCES (25)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- T. Taylor, E. J. Strait, L. L. Lao et al., Phys. Plasmas 2, 2390 (1995).
- T. Ivers, E. Eisner, A. Garafalo et al., Phys. Plasmas 3, 1926 (1996).
- O. Sauter, R. J. LaHaye, Z. Chang et al., Phys. Plasmas 4, 1654 (1997).
- J. S. Sarff, N. E. Lanier, S. C. Prager, and M. R. Stoneking, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 62 (1997).
- M. N. Rosenbluth,
Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 41, A99 (1999) . - H. P. Furth, J. Killeen, and M. N. Rosenbluth, Phys. Fluids 6, 459 (1963).
- J. A. Wesson,
Nucl. Fusion 18, 87 (1978) . - R. Carrera, R. D. Hazeltine, and M. Kotschenreuther, Phys. Fluids 29, 899 (1986).
- P. H. Rutherford, Phys. Fluids 16, 1903 (1973).
- R. B. White, D. A. Monticello, M. N. Rosenbluth, and B. V. Waddell, Phys. Fluids 20, 800 (1977).
- A. Thyagaraja, Phys. Fluids 24, 1716 (1981).
- A. H. Boozer, Phys. Fluids 27, 2055 (1984).
- Z. Chang and J. D. Callen,
Nucl. Fusion 30, 219 (1990) . - V. V. Arsenin, L. I. Artemenkov, N. V. Ivanov et al., in Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research 1978, Proceedings of the 16th International Conference, Innsbruck (International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1979), Vol. 1, p. 233.
- A. W. Morris, T. C. Hender, J. Hugill et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1254 (1990).
- G. A. Navratil, C. Cates, M. E. Mauel et al., Phys. Plasmas 5, 1855 (1998).
- E. Lazzaro and M. F. F. Nave, Phys. Fluids 31, 1623 (1988).
- J. Norris,
Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 31, 699 (1989) . - A. Thyagaraja,
Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 32, 155 (1990) . - M. S. Chu, H. Ikezi, and T. H. Jensen, Phys. Fluids 27, 472 (1984).
- The standard large aspect ratio ordering is R0/a
1, where R0 and a are the major and minor radii of the plasma, respectively. - The conventional definition of this parameter is
= 2µ0
p
/
B2
, where 
![[centered ellipsis]](http://scitation.aip.org/stockgif2/cellip.gif)
denotes a volume average, p is the plasma pressure, and B is the magnetic field strength. - W. A. Newcomb,
Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 10, 232 (1960) . - R. Fitzpatrick, Phys. Plasmas 6, 1168 (1999).
- R. Fitzpatrick and F. L. Waelbroeck, Phys. Plasmas 7, 4983 (2000).







