A numerical study of forced magnetic reconnection in the viscous Taylor problem
Phys. Plasmas 10, 2304 (2003); doi:10.1063/1.1574516
Issue Date: June 2003
You are not logged in to this journal. Log in
Two-dimensional, nonlinear magnetohydrodynamical simulations are used to investigate the so-called Taylor problem, in which a small amplitude boundary perturbation is suddenly applied to a tearing stable, slab plasma equilibriumthe perturbation being such as to drive magnetic reconnection within the plasma. This type of reconnection, which is not due to an intrinsic plasma instability, is generally known as "forced reconnection." For numerical reasons, the investigation is restricted to the large magnetic Prandtl number limit. The simulation results are highly consistent with the analysis of Hahm and Kulsrud [Phys. Fluids 28, 2412 (1985)] (modified by strong plasma viscosity). At high perturbation amplitudes, the system exhibits a phase of SweetParker reconnection, as predicted by Wang and Bhattacharjee [Phys. Fluids B 4, 1795 (1992)]. An expression for the threshold perturbation amplitude required to trigger SweetParker reconnection is derived, and successfully benchmarked against numerical simulations. This expression suggests that a SweetParker phase is only likely to occur during forced reconnection in tokamaks when the plasma is extremely hot and perturbation amplitude relatively large. ©2003 American Institute of Physics.
| History: | Received 22 November 2002; accepted 21 March 2003 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?PHPAEN/10/2304/1 |
KEYWORDS and PACS
RELATED DATABASES
PUBLICATION DATA
1070-664X (print)
1089-7674 (online)
REFERENCES (20)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- T. S. Hahm and R. M. Kulsrud, Phys. Fluids 28, 2412 (1985).
- X. Wang and A. Bhattacharjee, Phys. Fluids B 4, 1795 (1992).
- Z. W. Ma, X. Wang, and A. Bhattacharjee, Phys. Plasmas 3, 2427 (1996).
- J. Rem and T. J. Schep,
Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 40, 139 (1998) . - G. Veckstein and R. Jain, Phys. Plasmas 5, 1506 (1998).
- G. Veckstein and R. Jain, Phys. Plasmas 6, 2897 (1999).
- A. Ishizawa and S. Tokuda, Phys. Plasmas 7, 875 (2000).
- A. Bhattacharjee, R. Fitzpatrick, and X. Wang, Phys. Plasmas 8, 374 (2001).
- A. Ishizawa and S. Tokuda, Phys. Plasmas 8, 376 (2001).
- J. T. Scoville, R. J. La Haye, A. G. Kellman, T. H. Osborne, R. D. Stambaugh, E. J. Strait, and T. S. Taylor,
Nucl. Fusion 31, 875 (1991) . - G. M. Fishpool and P. S. Haynes,
Nucl. Fusion 34, 109 (1994) . - C. C. Hegna, J. D. Callen, and R. J. La Haye, Phys. Plasmas 6, 130 (1999).
- P. H. Rutherford, Phys. Fluids 16, 1903 (1973).
- P. A. Sweet, Electromagnetic Phenomena in Cosmical Physics (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1958).
- E. N. Parker,
J. Geophys. Res. 62, 509 (1957) . - H. P. Furth, J. Killeen, and M. N. Rosenbluth, Phys. Fluids 6, 459 (1963).
- R. Fitzpatrick, Phys. Plasmas 1, 3308 (1994).
- W. Park, D. A. Monticello, and R. B. White, Phys. Fluids 27, 137 (1984).
- F. L. Waelbroeck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3259 (1993).
- D. S. Harned and D. D. Schnack,
J. Comput. Phys. 65, 57 (1986) .







