Physics of Plasmas
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Magnetic field perturbations correlated with large amplitude lower-hybrid waves in a high-voltage linear plasma discharge
The results of theoretical and experimental studies on excitation of magnetic field perturbations correlated with large amplitude lower-hybrid (LH) wave bursts in a high-voltage linear plasma discharg...
Next Article
Fast magnetic field penetration into a magnetized plasma with nonuniform density: A new family of shock solutions
Fast magnetic field-penetration into almost collisionless plasmas occurs through two previously studied mechanisms. The magnetic field can penetrate as a shock wave, into plasmas of nonuniform density...

A numerical study of forced magnetic reconnection in the viscous Taylor problem

Phys. Plasmas 10, 2304 (2003); doi:10.1063/1.1574516

Issue Date: June 2003

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Richard Fitzpatrick
Center for Magnetic Reconnection Studies, Institute for Fusion Studies, Department of Physics, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712
Two-dimensional, nonlinear magnetohydrodynamical simulations are used to investigate the so-called Taylor problem, in which a small amplitude boundary perturbation is suddenly applied to a tearing stable, slab plasma equilibrium—the perturbation being such as to drive magnetic reconnection within the plasma. This type of reconnection, which is not due to an intrinsic plasma instability, is generally known as "forced reconnection." For numerical reasons, the investigation is restricted to the large magnetic Prandtl number limit. The simulation results are highly consistent with the analysis of Hahm and Kulsrud [Phys. Fluids 28, 2412 (1985)] (modified by strong plasma viscosity). At high perturbation amplitudes, the system exhibits a phase of Sweet–Parker reconnection, as predicted by Wang and Bhattacharjee [Phys. Fluids B 4, 1795 (1992)]. An expression for the threshold perturbation amplitude required to trigger Sweet–Parker reconnection is derived, and successfully benchmarked against numerical simulations. This expression suggests that a Sweet–Parker phase is only likely to occur during forced reconnection in tokamaks when the plasma is extremely hot and perturbation amplitude relatively large. ©2003 American Institute of Physics.
History: Received 22 November 2002; accepted 21 March 2003
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?PHPAEN/10/2304/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$28)
Download PDF (189 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 52.30.Cv
    Plasma magnetohydrodynamics including electron magnetohydrodynamics
  • 52.55.Fa
    Tokamaks
  • 52.65.Kj
    Magnetohydrodynamic and fluid equation (plasma simulation)
  • YEAR: 2003

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
1070-664X (print)   1089-7674 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (20)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. T. S. Hahm and R. M. Kulsrud, Phys. Fluids 28, 2412 (1985).
  2. X. Wang and A. Bhattacharjee, Phys. Fluids B 4, 1795 (1992).
  3. Z. W. Ma, X. Wang, and A. Bhattacharjee, Phys. Plasmas 3, 2427 (1996).
  4. J. Rem and T. J. Schep, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 40, 139 (1998).
  5. G. Veckstein and R. Jain, Phys. Plasmas 5, 1506 (1998).
  6. G. Veckstein and R. Jain, Phys. Plasmas 6, 2897 (1999).
  7. A. Ishizawa and S. Tokuda, Phys. Plasmas 7, 875 (2000).
  8. A. Bhattacharjee, R. Fitzpatrick, and X. Wang, Phys. Plasmas 8, 374 (2001).
  9. A. Ishizawa and S. Tokuda, Phys. Plasmas 8, 376 (2001).
  10. J. T. Scoville, R. J. La Haye, A. G. Kellman, T. H. Osborne, R. D. Stambaugh, E. J. Strait, and T. S. Taylor, Nucl. Fusion 31, 875 (1991).
  11. G. M. Fishpool and P. S. Haynes, Nucl. Fusion 34, 109 (1994).
  12. C. C. Hegna, J. D. Callen, and R. J. La Haye, Phys. Plasmas 6, 130 (1999).
  13. P. H. Rutherford, Phys. Fluids 16, 1903 (1973).
  14. P. A. Sweet, Electromagnetic Phenomena in Cosmical Physics (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1958).
  15. E. N. Parker, J. Geophys. Res. 62, 509 (1957).
  16. H. P. Furth, J. Killeen, and M. N. Rosenbluth, Phys. Fluids 6, 459 (1963).
  17. R. Fitzpatrick, Phys. Plasmas 1, 3308 (1994).
  18. W. Park, D. A. Monticello, and R. B. White, Phys. Fluids 27, 137 (1984).
  19. F. L. Waelbroeck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3259 (1993).
  20. D. S. Harned and D. D. Schnack, J. Comput. Phys. 65, 57 (1986).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.