Physics of Plasmas
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Effect of discrete coherent structures on plasma-wall interactions in the scrape-off-layer
The effect of discrete plasma transport by coherent structures on plasma-wall interactions in the scrape-off-layer (SOL) is illustrated by a simple model problem. A one-dimensional ballistic model is ...
Next Article
Temperature and density characteristics of the Helicity Injected Torus-II spherical tokamak indicating closed flux sustainment using coaxial helicity injection
The electron temperature and density profiles of plasmas in the Helicity Injected Torus [HIT-II: T. R. Jarboe et al., Phys. Plasmas 5, 1807 (1998)] experiment are measured by multipoint Thomson scatte...

Electron thermal transport analysis in Tokamak à Configuration Variable

Phys. Plasmas 15, 082317 (2008); doi:10.1063/1.2965828

Published 29 August 2008

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

E. Asp,1 J.-H. Kim,2 W. Horton,2 L. Porte,1 S. Alberti,1 A. Karpushov,1 Y. Martin,1 O. Sauter,1 G. Turri,1 and the TCV TEAM
1Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasmas Association Euratom-Confédération Suisse, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
2Institute for Fusion Studies, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA

A Tokamak à Configuration Variable (TCV) [G. Tonetti, A. Heym, F. Hofmann et al., in Proceedings of the 16th Symposium on Fusion Technology, London, U.K., edited by R. Hemsworth (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1991), p. 587] plasma with high power density (up to 8  MW/m3) core deposited electron cyclotron resonance heating at significant plasma densities (<=7×1019  m−3) is analyzed for the electron thermal transport. The discharge distinguishes itself as it has four distinct high confinement mode (H-mode) phases. An Ohmic H-mode with type III edge localized modes (ELMs), which turns into a type I ELMy H-mode when the ECRH is switched on. The ELMs then vanish, which gives rise to a quasistationary ELM-free H-mode. This ELM-free phase can be divided into two, one without magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) and one with. The MHD mode in the latter case causes the confinement to drop by ~15%. For all four phases both large-scale trapped electron (TEM) and ion temperature gradient (ITG) modes and small-scale electron temperature gradient (ETG) modes are analyzed. The analytical TEM formulas have difficulty in explaining both the magnitude and the radial profile of the electron thermal flux. Collisionality governs the drive of the TEM, which for the discharge in question implies it can be driven by either the temperature or density gradient. The TEM response function is derived and it is shown to be relatively small and to have sharp resonances in its energy dependence. The ETG turbulence, predicted by the Institute for Fusion Studies electron gyrofluid code, is on the other hand driven solely by the electron temperature gradient. Both trapped and passing electrons add to the ETG instability and turbulent thermal flux. For easy comparison of the results of the above approaches and also with the Weiland model, a dimensionless error measure, the so-called average relative variance is introduced. According to this method the ETG model explains 70% of the variation in the electron heat diffusivity whereas the predictive capabilities of the TEM-ITG models are poor. These results for TCV support the conclusion that the ETG model is able to explain a wide range of anomalous electron transport data, in addition to existing evidence from ASDEX [F. Ryter, F. Leuterer, G. Pereverzev, H.-U. Fahrbach, J. Stober, W. Suttrop, and the ASDEX Upgrade Team, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2325 (2001)], Tore Supra [G. T. Hoang, W. Horton, C. Bourdelle, B. Hu, X. Garbet, and M. Ottaviani, Phys. Plasmas 10, 405 (2003)] and the Frascati Tokamak Upgrade [A. Jacchia, F. D. Luca, S. Cirant, C. Sozzi, G. Bracco, A. Brushi, P. Buratti, S. Podda, and O. Tudisco, Nucl. Fusion 42, 1116 (2002)]. ©2008 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 19 March 2008; accepted 10 July 2008; published 29 August 2008
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?PHPAEN/15/082317/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$24)
Download PDF (1117 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
1070-664X (print)   1089-7674 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (45)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. G. Tonetti, A. Heym, F. Hofmann, C. Hollenstein, J. Koechili, K. Lahlou, J. B. Lister, Ph. Marmillod, J. M. Mayor, J. C. Magnin, F. Marcus, and R. Rage, in Proceedings of the 16th Symposium on Fusion Technology, London, U.K., edited by R. Hemsworth (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1991), p. 587.
  2. L. Porte, S. Coda, S. Alberti, G. Arnoux, P. Blanchard, A. Bortolon, A. Fasoli, T. P. Goodman, I. Klimanov, Y. Martin, M. Maslov, A. Scarabosio, and H. Weisen, in 21st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference (IAEA, Vienna, 2006), pp. EX/P6-20.
  3. J. Lohr, B. W. Stallard, R. Prater, R. T. Snider, K. H. Burrell, R. J. Groebner, D. N. Hill, K. Matsuda, C. P. Moeller, T. W. Petrie, H. St. John, and T. S. Taylor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2630 (1988).
  4. S. J. Fielding, J. D. Ashall, P. G. Carolan, A. Colton, D. Gates, J. Hugill, A. W. Morris, M. Valovic, and the COMPASS-D ECRH Teams, and Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 38, 1091 (1996).
  5. K. Matsuda, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 17, 6 (1989).
  6. P. Zhu, W. Horton, and H. Sugama, Phys. Plasmas 6, 2503 (1999).
  7. P. Zhu, G. Bateman, A. H. Kritz, and W. Horton, Phys. Plasmas 7, 2898 (2000).
  8. S. Guo and J. Weiland, Nucl. Fusion 37, 1095 (1997).
  9. A. Jarmén, P. Andersson, and J. Weiland, Nucl. Fusion 27, 941 (1987).
  10. H. Nordman, J. Weiland, and A. Jarmén, Nucl. Fusion 30, 983 (1990).
  11. J. Weiland, Collective Modes in Inhomogeneous Plasma (IOP, New York, 2000).
  12. W. Horton, H. V. Wong, P. J. Morrison, A. Wurm, J. H. Kim, J. C. Perez, J. Pratt, G. T. Hoang, B. P. LeBlanc, and R. Ball, Nucl. Fusion 45, 976 (2005).
  13. J.-H. Kim, Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas at Austin (2008).
  14. F. Ryter, F. Leuterer, G. Pereverzev, H.-U. Fahrbach, J. Stober, W. Suttrop, and ASDEX Upgrade Team, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2325 (2001).
  15. F. Ryter, F. Imbeaux, F. Leuterer, H.-U. Fahrbach, W. Suttrop, and ASDEX Upgrade Team, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5498 (2001).
  16. G. T. Hoang, W. Horton, C. Bourdelle, B. Hu, X. Garbet, and M. Ottaviani, Phys. Plasmas 10, 405 (2003).
  17. A. Jacchia, F. D. Luca, S. Cirant, C. Sozzi, G. Bracco, A. Brushi, P. Buratti, S. Podda, and O. Tudisco, Nucl. Fusion 42, 1116 (2002).
  18. A. S. Weigend, B. A. Huberman, and D. E. Rumelhart, Int. J. Neural Syst. 1, 193 (1990).
  19. T. Detman and D. Vassiliadis, in Geophysical Monograph (American Geophysical Union, New York, 1997), Vol. 98.
  20. A. N. Karpushov, B. P. Duval, C. Schlatter, V. I. Afanasyev, and F. V. Chernyshev, Phys. Plasmas 13, 033503 (2006).
  21. G. Turri, O. Sauter, L. Porte, S. Alberti, E. Asp, T. Goodman, Y. Martin, V. Udintsev, and C. Zucca, J. Phys. A 39, 6 (2008).
  22. Z. Chang and J. Callen, Nucl. Fusion 30, 219 (1990).
  23. S. Hamaguchi and W. Horton, Phys. Fluids B 4, 319 (1992).
  24. H. Sugama and W. Horton, Phys. Plasmas 2, 2989 (1995).
  25. W. Horton, G. T. Hoang, C. Bourdelle, X. Garbet, M. Ottaviani, and L. Colas, Phys. Plasmas 11, 2600 (2004).
  26. W. Horton and T. Tajima, J. Geophys. Res. 93, 2741, DOI: 10.1029/JA093iA04p02741 (1988).
  27. J. Li and Y. Kishimoto, Phys. Plasmas 11, 1493 (2004).
  28. C. Holland and P. H. Diamond, Phys. Plasmas 9, 3857 (2002).
  29. W. Horton, B. G. Hong, and W. M. Tang, Phys. Fluids 31, 2971 (1988).
  30. W. Horton, N. Bekki, H. L. Berk, B. G. Hong, M. J. LeBron, S. Mahajan, T. Tajima, and Y. Z. Zhang, in 12th International Conference on Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research (International Atomic Energy Agency, London, 1988), cN-50/D-4-3.
  31. W. Horton, B.-G. Hong, T. Tajima, and N. Bekki, Comments Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 13, 207 (1990).
  32. G. W. Hammett and F. W. Perkins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 3019 (1990).
  33. R. Koch and W. Horton, Phys. Fluids 18, 861 (1975).
  34. W. Horton, Phys. Fluids 19, 711 (1976).
  35. H. Nordman, P. Strand, A. Eriksson, and J. Weiland, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 47, L11 (2005).
  36. J. Weiland, E. Asp, X. Garbet, P. Mantica, V. Parail, P. Thomas, W. Suttrop, T. Tala, and the EFDA-JET Contributors, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 47, 441 (2005).
  37. H. Nordman, T. Fulop, J. Candy, P. Strand, and J. Weiland, Phys. Plasmas 14, 052303 (2007).
  38. J. Weiland and I. Holod, Phys. Plasmas 12, 012505 (2005).
  39. J. Weiland and H. Nordman, in Anomalous momentum transport due to drift waves in tokamaks, 33rd European Physical Society Conference on Plasma Physics, Rome, Italy, 19–23 June, 2006, edited by F. De Marco and G. Vlad (European Physical Society, Rome, Italy, 2006), Vol. 31, p. P2.186.
  40. A. Eriksson, H. Nordman, P. Strand, J. Weiland, T. Tala, E. Asp, G. Corrigan, C. Giroud, M. de Greef, I. Jenkins, H. C. M. Knoops, P. Mantica, K. M. Rantamaki, P. C. de Vries, K. D. Zastrow, and the JET EFDA Contributors, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 49, 1931 (2007).
  41. J. Weiland and H. Nordman, in Theory of Fusion Plasmas: Proceedings of the Joint Varenna-Lausanne International Workshop, edited by A. Guthrie and R. K. Wakerling (Editrice Compositori for Societa Italiana di Fisica, Bologna, 1988).
  42. E. Asp, J. Weiland, X. Garbet, V. Parail, P. Strand, and the JET EFDA Contributors, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 49, 1221 (2007).
  43. J. Weiland, E. Asp, X. Garbet, P. Mantica, V. Parail, P. Thomas, W. Suttrop, T. Tala, and the EFDA-JET Contributors, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 47, 441 (2005).
  44. URL http://pecos.ph.utexas.edu/~vortex.
  45. T. Watanabe, H. Sugama, and W. Horton, Phys. Plasmas 14, 022502 (2007).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.