Physics of Plasmas
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Macroscopic control parameter for avalanche models for bursty transport
Similarity analysis is used to identify the control parameter RA for the subset of avalanching systems that can exhibit self-organized criticality (SOC). This parameter expresses the ratio of driving ...
Next Article
Renormalized theory of the ion cyclotron turbulence in magnetic field-aligned plasma shear flow
The analytical treatment of nonlinear evolution of the shear-flow-modified current driven ion cyclotron instability and shear-flow-driven ion cyclotron kinetic instabilities of magnetic field-aligned ...

Modifications of turbulence and turbulent transport associated with a bias-induced confinement transition in the Large Plasma Device

Phys. Plasmas 16, 012304 (2009); doi:10.1063/1.3059410

Published 21 January 2009

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

T. A. Carter1,2 and J. E. Maggs1
1Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095-1547, USA
2Center for Multiscale Plasma Dynamics, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095-1547, USA

Azimuthal flow is driven in the edge of the Large Plasma Device (LAPD) [W. Gekelman et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 62, 2875 (1991)] through biasing a section of the vacuum vessel relative to the plasma source cathode. As the applied bias exceeds a threshold, a transition in radial particle confinement is observed, evidenced by a dramatic steepening in the density profile, similar to the L- to H-mode transition in toroidal confinement devices. The threshold behavior and dynamic behavior of radial transport is related to flow penetration and the degree of spatial overlap between the flow shear and density gradient profiles. An investigation of the changes in turbulence and turbulent particle transport associated with the confinement transition is presented. Two-dimensional cross-correlation measurements show that the spatial coherence of edge turbulence in LAPD changes significantly with biasing. The azimuthal correlation in the turbulence increases dramatically, while the radial correlation length is little altered. Turbulent amplitude is reduced at the transition, particularly in electric field fluctuations, but the dominant change observed is in the cross-phase between density and electric field fluctuations. The changes in cross-phase lead to a suppression and then apparent reversal of turbulent particle flux as the threshold is exceeded. ©2009 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 14 July 2008; accepted 9 December 2008; published 21 January 2009
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?PHPAEN/16/012304/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$24)
Download PDF (417 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
1070-664X (print)   1089-7674 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (41)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. P. C. Liewer, Nucl. Fusion 25, 543 (1985).
  2. F. Wagner, G. Becker, K. Behringer, D. Campbell, A. Eberhagen, W. Engelhardt, G. Fussmann, O. Gehre, J. Gernhardt, G. Vongierke, G. Haas, M. Huang, F. Karger, M. Keilhacker, O. Kluber, M. Kornherr, K. Lackner, G. Lisitano, G. G. Lister, H. M. Mayer, D. Meisel, E. R. Muller, H. Murmann, H. Niedermeyer, W. Poschenrieder, H. Rapp, H. Rohr, F. Schneider, G. Siller, E. Speth, A. Stabler, K. H. Steuer, G. Venus, O. Vollmer, and Z. Yu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1408 (1982).
  3. K. H. Burrell, Phys. Plasmas 4, 1499 (1997).
  4. P. W. Terry, Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 109 (2000).
  5. R. J. Taylor, M. L. Brown, B. D. Fried, H. Grote, J. R. Liberati, G. J. Morales, P. Pribyl, D. Darrow, and M. Ono, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 2365 (1989).
  6. G. R. Tynan, J. Liberati, P. Pribyl, R. J. Taylor, and B. Wells, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 38, 1301 (1996).
  7. R. R. Weynants, G. Van Oost, G. Bertschinger, J. Boedo, P. Brys, T. Delvigne, K. H. Dippel, F. Durodie, H. Euringer, K. H. Finken, D. S. Gray, J. D. Hey, D. L. Hillis, J. T. Hogan, L. Konen, R. Leners, A. M. Messian, A. Pospieszczyck, U. Samm, R. P. Schorn, B. Schweer, G. Telesca, R. Vannieuwenhove, and P. E. Vandenplas, Nucl. Fusion 32, 837 (1992).
  8. J. Boedo, D. Gray, S. Jachmich, R. Conn, G. P. Terry, G. Tynan, G. Van Oost, R. R. Weynants, and T. Team, Nucl. Fusion 40, 1397 (2000).
  9. C. Silva, H. Figueiredo, I. Nedzelskiy, B. Goncalves, and C. A. F. Varandas, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 48, 727 (2006).
  10. D. Craig, A. F. Almagri, J. K. Anderson, J. T. Chapman, C. S. Chiang, N. A. Crocker, D. J. DenHartog, G. Fiksel, S. C. Prager, J. S. Sarff, and M. R. Stoneking, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1865 (1997).
  11. B. E. Chapman, A. F. Almagri, J. K. Anderson, C. S. Chiang, D. Craig, G. Fiksel, N. E. Lanier, S. C. Prager, J. S. Sarff, M. R. Stoneking, and P. W. Terry, Phys. Plasmas 5, 1848 (1998).
  12. M. G. Shats, K. Toi, K. Ohkuni, Y. Yoshimura, M. Osakabe, G. Matsunaga, M. Isobe, S. Nishimura, S. Okamura, K. Matsuoka, and C. Grp, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 6042 (2000).
  13. O. Sakai, Y. Yasaka, and R. Itatani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 4071 (1993).
  14. H. Biglari, P. H. Diamond, and P. W. Terry, Phys. Fluids B 2, 1 (1990).
  15. E. J. Powers, Nucl. Fusion 14, 749 (1974).
  16. A. S. Ware, P. W. Terry, P. H. Diamond, and B. A. Carreras, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 38, 1343 (1996).
  17. R. A. Moyer, K. H. Burrell, T. N. Carlstrom, S. Coda, R. W. Conn, E. J. Doyle, P. Gohil, R. J. Groebner, J. Kim, R. Lehmer, W. A. Peebles, M. Porkolab, C. L. Rettig, T. L. Rhodes, R. P. Seraydarian, R. Stockdale, D. M. Thomas, G. R. Tynan, and J. G. Watkins, Phys. Plasmas 2, 2397 (1995).
  18. J. E. Maggs, T. A. Carter, and R. J. Taylor, Phys. Plasmas 14, 052507 (2007).
  19. W. Horton, J. C. Perez, T. Carter, and R. Bengtson, Phys. Plasmas 12, 022303 (2005).
  20. J. C. Perez, W. Horton, R. D. Bengtson, and T. Carter, Phys. Plasmas 13, 055701 (2006).
  21. W. Gekelman, H. Pfister, Z. Lucky, J. Bamber, D. Leneman, and J. Maggs, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 62, 2875 (1991).
  22. D. Leneman, W. Gekelman, and J. Maggs, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 77, 015108 (2006).
  23. P. Pribyl and W. Gekelman, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 75, 669 (2004).
  24. S.-L. Chen and T. Sekiguchi, J. Appl. Phys. 36, 2363 (1965).
  25. J. P. Gunn, C. Boucher, P. Devynck, I. Duran, K. Dyabilin, J. Horacek, M. Hron, J. Stockel, G. Van Oost, H. Van Goubergen, and F. Zacek, Phys. Plasmas 8, 1995 (2001).
  26. T. Shikama, S. Kado, A. Okamoto, S. Kajita, and S. Tanaka, Phys. Plasmas 12, 044504 (2005).
  27. J. E. Maggs and G. J. Morales, Phys. Plasmas 10, 2267 (2003).
  28. W. Horton, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 735 (1999).
  29. A. Bencze and S. Zoletnik, Phys. Plasmas 12, 052323 (2005).
  30. J. A. Boedo, D. S. Gray, P. W. Terry, S. Jachmich, G. R. Tynan, R. W. Conn, and TEXTOR-94 Team, Nucl. Fusion 42, 117 (2002).
  31. G. R. Tynan, C. Holland, J. H. Yu, A. James, D. Nishijima, M. Shimada, and N. Taheri, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 48, S51 (2006).
  32. P. W. Terry, D. E. Newman, and A. S. Ware, Phys. Plasmas 10, 1066 (2003).
  33. S.-I. Itoh and K. Itoh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2276 (1988).
  34. K. Itoh and S.-I. Itoh, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 38, 1 (1996).
  35. J. W. Connor and H. R. Wilson, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 42, R1 (2000).
  36. G. R. Tynan, R. A. Moyer, and M. J. Burin, Phys. Plasmas 8, 2691 (2001).
  37. P. H. Diamond, S.-I. Itoh, K. Itoh, and T. A. Hahm, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 47, R35 (2005).
  38. C. Holland, J. H. Yu, A. James, D. Nishikima, M. Shimada, N. Taheri, and G. R. Tynan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 195002 (2006).
  39. R. A. Moyer, G. R. Tynan, C. Holland, and M. J. Burin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 135001 (2001).
  40. A. E. White, S. J. Zweben, M. J. Burin, T. A. Carter, T. S. Hahm, J. A. Krommes, and R. J. Maqueda, Phys. Plasmas 13, 072301 (2006).
  41. P. Ricci, B. N. Rogers, and S. Brunner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 225002 (2008).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.