Effect of flow damping on drift-tearing magnetic islands in tokamak plasmas
Phys. Plasmas 16, 072507 (2009); doi:10.1063/1.3191719
Published 28 July 2009
You are not logged in to this journal. Log in
A systematic fluid theory of nonlinear drift-tearing magnetic island dynamics in a conventional large aspect-ratio low-
circular cross-section tokamak plasma is derived from a set of single-helicity reduced neoclassical-magnetohydrodynamical equations which incorporate electron and ion diamagnetic flows, ion gyroviscosity, poloidal and toroidal flow damping, cross flux-surface momentum and particle transport, the sound wave, and the drift wave. The equations neglect the compressible Alfvén wave, electron inertia, the electron viscosity tensor, magnetic field-line curvature, and finite ion orbit widths. A collisional closure is used for plasma dynamics parallel to the magnetic field. The influence of various different levels of flow damping on the phase velocity of an isolated island, as well as the ion polarization term appearing in its Rutherford equation, are investigated in detail. Furthermore, it is found that, under certain circumstances, a locked island is subject to destabilizing ion polarization term to which a comparable isolated (i.e., rotating) island is not.
©2009 American Institute of Physics
circular cross-section tokamak plasma is derived from a set of single-helicity reduced neoclassical-magnetohydrodynamical equations which incorporate electron and ion diamagnetic flows, ion gyroviscosity, poloidal and toroidal flow damping, cross flux-surface momentum and particle transport, the sound wave, and the drift wave. The equations neglect the compressible Alfvén wave, electron inertia, the electron viscosity tensor, magnetic field-line curvature, and finite ion orbit widths. A collisional closure is used for plasma dynamics parallel to the magnetic field. The influence of various different levels of flow damping on the phase velocity of an isolated island, as well as the ion polarization term appearing in its Rutherford equation, are investigated in detail. Furthermore, it is found that, under certain circumstances, a locked island is subject to destabilizing ion polarization term to which a comparable isolated (i.e., rotating) island is not.
©2009 American Institute of Physics
| History: | Received 8 April 2009; accepted 9 July 2009; published 28 July 2009 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?PHPAEN/16/072507/1 |
KEYWORDS and PACS
RELATED DATABASES
PUBLICATION DATA
1070-664X (print)
1089-7674 (online)
REFERENCES (35)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- J. A. Wesson, Tokamaks, 3rd ed. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004).
- A. H. Boozer, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 1071 (2005).
- J. P. Freidberg, Ideal Magnetohydrodynamics (Springer, Berlin, 1987).
- J. A. Wesson,
Nucl. Fusion 18, 87 (1978) . - H. P. Furth, J. Killeen, and M. N. Rosenbluth, Phys. Fluids 6, 459 (1963).
- P. H. Rutherford, Phys. Fluids 16, 1903 (1973).
- F. Militello and F. Porcelli, Phys. Plasmas 11, L13 (2004).
- D. F. Escande and M. Ottaviani,
Phys. Lett. A 323, 278 (2004) . - Z. Chang and J. D. Callen,
Nucl. Fusion 30, 219 (1990) . - R. Fitzpatrick and F. L. Waelbroeck, Phys. Plasmas 15, 012502 (2008).
- J. D. Callen, W. X. Qu, K. D. Siebert, B. A. Carreras, K. C. Shaing, and D. A. Spong, Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research, Kyoto, 1986 (International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1987), Vol. 2, p. 157.
- K. Shaing, Phys. Plasmas 10, 1443 (2003).
- S. V. Konovalov, A. B. Mikhailovskii, M. S. Shirokov, and V. S. Tsypin,
Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 44, L51 (2002) . - P. H. Rutherford, Proceeding of Course and Workshop on Basic Physics Processes of Toroidal Fusion Plasmas, Varenna, 1985 (Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, 1986), Vol. 2, p. 531.
- R. D. Hazeltine and J. D. Meiss, Plasma Confinement (Dover, New York, 2003).
- M. Kotschenreuther, R. D. Hazeltine, and P. J. Morrison, Phys. Fluids 28, 294 (1985).
- A. I. Smolyakov, X. Garbet, and M. Ottaviani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 055002 (2007).
- S. E. Kruger, C. C. Hegna, and J. D. Callen, Phys. Plasmas 5, 4169 (1998).
- R. D. Hazeltine, Phys. Fluids 17, 961 (1974).
- Y. B. Kim, P. H. Diamond, and R. J. Groebner, Phys. Fluids B 4, 2996 (1992).
- A. J. Cole, C. C. Hegna, and J. D. Callen, Phys. Plasmas 15, 056102 (2008).
- R. Fitzpatrick and F. L. Waelbroeck, Phys. Plasmas 12, 022307 (2005).
- A. Furuya, M. Yagi, and S. -I. Itoh,
J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 72, 313 (2003) . - A. Bergmann, E. Poli, and A. G. Peeters, Phys. Plasmas 12, 072501 (2005).
- S. I. Braginskii, Reviews of Plasma Physics (Consultants Bureau, New York, 1965), Vol. 1, p. 205.
- A. I. Smolyakov,
Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 35, 657 (1993) . - R. Fitzpatrick,
Nucl. Fusion 33, 1049 (1993) . - J. W. Connor, F. L. Waelbroeck, and H. R. Wilson, Phys. Plasmas 8, 2835 (2001).
- F. L. Waelbroeck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 035002 (2005).
- F. L. Waelbroeck and R. Fitzpatrick, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1703 (1997).
- A. I. Smolyakov, A. Hirose, E. Lazzaro, G. B. Re, and J. D. Callen, Phys. Plasmas 2, 1581 (1995).
- T. C. Hender, R. Fitzpatrick, A. W. Morris, P. G. Carolan, R. D. Durst, T. Edlington, J. Ferreira, S. J. Fielding, P. S. Haynes, J. Hugill, I. J. Jenkins, R. J. La Haye, B. J. Parham, D. C. Robinson, T. N. Todd, M. Valovic, and G. Vayakis,
Nucl. Fusion 32, 2091 (1992) . - R. Fitzpatrick and F. L. Waelbroeck, Phys. Plasmas 12, 122511 (2005).
- A. B. Mikhailovskii, V. D. Pustovitov, V. S. Tsypin, and A. I. Smolyakov, Phys. Plasmas 7, 1204 (2000).
- A. B. Mikhailovskii, V. D. Pustovitov, A. I. Smolyakov, and V. S. Tsypin, Phys. Plasmas 7, 1214 (2000).







