Physics of Plasmas
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Nonlinear evolution of Buneman instability and its implication for electron acceleration in high Mach number collisionless perpendicular shocks
Nonlinear evolution of the Buneman instability and its application to electron acceleration in collisionless shocks are discussed. Two-dimensional particle-in-cell simulations show that the saturation...
Next Article
Quasi-thermal noise in space plasma: “kappa” distributions
The transport of energy in collisionless plasmas, especially in space plasmas, is far from being understood. Measuring the temperature of the electrons and their nonthermal properties can give importa...

Kinetic theory for the ion humps at the foot of the Earth's bow shock

Phys. Plasmas 16, 102902 (2009); doi:10.1063/1.3240342

Published 5 October 2009

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

D. Jovanović1 and V. V. Krasnoselskikh2
1Institute of Physics, P.O. Box 57, 11001 Belgrade, Serbia
2LPCE/CNRS, 3A, Avenue de la Recherche Scientifique, 45071 Orléans Cedex 2, France

The nonlinear kinetic theory is presented for the ion acoustic perturbations at the foot of the Earth's quasiperpendicular bow shock, that is characterized by weakly magnetized electrons and unmagnetized ions. The streaming ions, due to the reflection of the solar wind ions from the shock, provide the free energy source for the linear instability of the acoustic wave. In the fully nonlinear regime, a coherent localized solution is found in the form of a stationary ion hump, which is traveling with the velocity close to the phase velocity of the linear mode. The structure is supported by the nonlinearities coming from the increased population of the resonant beam ions, trapped in the self-consistent potential. As their size in the direction perpendicular to the local magnetic field is somewhat smaller that the electron Larmor radius and much larger that the Debye length, their spatial properties are determined by the effects of the magnetic field on weakly magnetized electrons. These coherent structures provide a theoretical explanation for the bipolar electric pulses, observed upstream of the shock by Polar and Cluster satellite missions. ©2009 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 3 August 2009; accepted 4 September 2009; published 5 October 2009
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?PHPAEN/16/102902/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$24)
Download PDF (846 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 52.25.Dg
    Plasma kinetic equations
  • 52.35.Tc
    Shock waves and discontinuities in plasma
  • 52.35.Fp
    Plasma electrostatic waves and oscillations
  • 52.35.Mw
    Nonlinear phenomena: plasma waves, wave propagation and other interactions
  • 96.50.Ci
    Solar wind plasma; sources of solar wind
  • 96.50.Fm
    Planetary bow shocks; interplanetary shocks
  • YEAR: 2009

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
1070-664X (print)   1089-7674 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (14)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. D. A. Gurnett, in Collisionless shocks in the heliosphere: Reviews of current research, Geophysical Monograph Series, Vol. 35 (American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, 1985), p. 207.
  2. M. Balikhin, S. Walker, R. Treumann, H. Alleyne, V. Krasnoselskikh, M. Gedalin, M. Andre, M. Dunlop, and A. Fazakerley, Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L24106, doi:10.1029/2005GL024660 (2005).
  3. V. V. Krasnoselskikh, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 89, 498 (1985).
  4. M. A. Balikhin, S. N. Walker, T. D. de Wit, H. S. C. K. Alleyne, L. J. C. Woolliscroft, W. A. C. Mier-Jedrzejowicz, and W. Baumjohann, Adv. Space Res. 20, 729 (1997).
  5. A. J. Hull, D. E. Larson, M. Wilber, J. D. Scudder, F. S. Mozer, C. T. Russell, and S. D. Bale, Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L15104, doi:10.1029/2005GL025564 (2006).
  6. Y. Hobara, S. N. Walker, M. Balikhin, O. A. Pokhotelov, M. Gedalin, V. Krasnoselskikh, M. Hayakawa, M. André, M. Dunlop, H. Rème, and A. Fazakerley, J. Geophys. Res. 113, A05211, doi:10.1029/2007JA012789 (2008).
  7. K. Meziane, C. Mazelle, M. Wilber, D. Lequéau, J. Eastwood, H. Rème, I. Dandouras, J. Sauvaud, J. Bosqued, G. Parks, L. M. Kistler, M. McCarthy, B. Klecker, A. Korth, M. B. Bavassano-Cattaneo, R. Lundin, and A. Balogh, Ann. Geophys. 22, 2325 (2004).
  8. M. Gedalin, M. Liverts, and M. A. Balikhin, J. Geophys. Res., [Space Phys.] 113, A05101, doi:10.1029/2007JA012894 (2008).
  9. Y. I. Yermolaev, A. O. Fedorov, O. L. Vaisberg, V. M. Balebanov, Y. A. Obod, R. Jimenez, J. Fleites, L. Llera, and A. N. Omelchenko, Ann. Geophys. 15, 533 (1997).
  10. A. Luque and H. Schamel, Phys. Rep. 415, 261 (2005).
  11. D. Jovanović and H. Schamel, Phys. Plasmas 9, 5079 (2002).
  12. O. G. Onishchenko, V. V. Krasnoselskikh, and O. A. Pokhotelov, Phys. Plasmas 15, 022903 (2008).
  13. M. Abramowitz and I. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions (National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C., 1964).
  14. F. W. J. Olver, Asymptotics and Special Functions (Academic Press, New York, 1974).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.