Phys. Rev. A 74, 062109 (2006) [8 pages]
Bell inequality with an arbitrary number of settings and its applications
Abstract
References (23)
Citing Articles
Koji Nagata, 1,2 Wies aw Laskowski, 1 and Tomasz Paterek1,31Instytut Fizyki Teoretycznej i Astrofizyki, Uniwersytet Gda ski, PL-80-952 Gda sk, Poland
2National Institute of Information and Communications Technology, 4-2-1 Nukuikita, Koganei, Tokyo 184-8795, Japan
3The Erwin Schrödinger International Institute for Mathematical Physics, Boltzmanngasse 9, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
Received 16 January 2006; revised 6 June 2006; published 18 December 2006
Based on a geometrical argument introduced by ukowski, a new multisetting Bell inequality is derived, for the scenario in which many parties make measurements on two-level systems. This generalizes and unifies some previous results. Moreover, a necessary and sufficient condition for the violation of this inequality is presented. It turns out that the class of nonseparable states which do not admit local realistic description is extended when compared to the two-setting inequalities. However, supporting the conjecture of Peres, quantum states with positive partial transposes with respect to all subsystems do not violate the inequality. Additionally, we follow a general link between Bell inequalities and communication complexity problems, and present a quantum protocol linked with the inequality, which outperforms the best classical protocol.
©2006 The American Physical Society
REFERENCES (23)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- A. K. Ekert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661 (1991);
V. Scarani and N. Gisin, ibid. 87, 117901 (2001);
-
. Brukner, M. ukowski, J.-W. Pan, and A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 127901 (2004).
- J. F. Clauser, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R. A. Holt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969).
- N. D. Mermin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1838 (1990);
M. Ardehali, Phys. Rev. A 46, 5375 (1992);
A. V. Belinskii and D. N. Klyshko, Phys. Usp. 36, 653 (1993).
- M.
ukowski, . Brukner, W. Laskowski, and M. Wie niak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 210402 (2002).
- W. Dür, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 230402 (2001).
- A. Peres, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1413 (1996);
- M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5239 (1998).
- M.
ukowski and D. Kaszlikowski, Phys. Rev. A 56, R1682 (1997).
- R. F. Werner and M. M. Wolf, Phys. Rev. A 64, 032112 (2001).
- M.
ukowski and . Brukner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 210401 (2002).
- D. Kaszlikowski, L. C. Kwek, J. Chen, and C. H. Oh, Phys. Rev. A 66, 052309 (2002).
- A. Sen (De), U. Sen, and M.
ukowski, Phys. Rev. A 66, 062318 (2002).
- K. Nagata, Phys. Rev. A 66, 064101 (2002).
- R. F. Werner and M. M. Wolf, Phys. Rev. A 61, 062102 (2000).
- P. Trojek, C. Schmid, M. Bourennane,
. Brukner, M. ukowski, and H. Weinfurter, Phys. Rev. A 72, 050305(R) (2005).
CITING ARTICLES
For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.
|
A new free weekly publication from APS
|