Phys. Rev. D 73, 083515 (2006) [15 pages]
Cosmology of mass-varying neutrinos driven by quintessence: Theory and observations
Abstract
References (82)
Citing Articles
A. W. Brookfield, 1 C. van de Bruck, 2 D. F. Mota, 3 and D. Tocchini-Valentini41Department of Applied Mathematics and Department of Physics, Astro-Particle Theory Cosmology Group, Hounsfield Road, Hicks Building, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S3 7RH, United Kingdom
2Department of Applied Mathematics, Astro-Particle Theory Cosmology Group, Hounsfield Road, Hicks Building, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S3 7RH, United Kingdom
3Institute of Theoretical Astrophysics, University of Oslo, 0315 Oslo, Norway
4Astrophysics Department, Oxford University, Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3RH, United Kingdom and Department of Physics and Astronomy, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA
Received 10 January 2006; published 12 April 2006
The effects of mass-varying neutrinos on cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies and large scale structures (LSS) are studied. In these models, dark energy and neutrinos are coupled such that the neutrino masses are functions of the scalar field playing the role of dark energy. We begin by describing the cosmological background evolution of such a system. It is pointed out that, similar to models with a dark matter/dark energy interaction, the apparent equation of state measured with SNIa can be smaller than -1. We then discuss the effect of mass-varying neutrinos on the CMB anisotropies and the matter power spectrum. A suppression of power in the CMB power spectrum at large angular scales is usually observed. We give an explanation for this behavior and discuss different couplings and quintessence potentials to show the generality of the results obtained. We perform a likelihood analysis using wide-ranging SNIa, CMB, and LSS observations to assess whether such theories are viable. Treating the neutrino mass as a free parameter we find that the constraints on the coupling are weak, since CMB and LSS surveys give only upper bounds on the neutrino mass. However, fixing a priori the neutrino masses, we find that there is some evidence that the existence of such a coupling is actually preferred by current cosmological data over the standard LambdaCDM cosmology.
©2006 The American Physical Society
REFERENCES (82)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- A. Albrecht and C. Skordis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2076 (2000).
- M. Doran and J. Jaeckel, Phys. Rev. D 66, 043519 (2002).
- S. M. Carroll, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3067 (1998).
- J. A. Frieman, C. T. Hill, A. Stebbins, and I. Waga, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2077 (1995).
- M. Li, X. Wang, B. Feng, and X. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 65, 103511 (2002).
- P. Gu, X. Wang, and X. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 68, 087301 (2003).
- D. B. Kaplan, A. E. Nelson, and N. Weiner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 091801 (2004).
- P. Gu and X.-J. Bi, Phys. Rev. D 70, 063511 (2004).
- X. Bi, P. Gu, X. Wang, and X. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 69, 113007 (2004).
- H. Bi, B. Feng, H. Li, and X. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 72, 123523 (2005).
- H. Li, Z. Dai, and X. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 71, 113003 (2005).
- R. D. Peccei, Phys. Rev. D 71, 023527 (2005).
- A. W. Brookfield, C. van de Bruck, D. F. Mota, and D. Tocchini-Valentini, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 061301 (2006).
- V. Barger, P. Huber, and D. Marfatia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 211802 (2005).
- N. Afshordi, M. Zaldarriaga, and K. Kohri, Phys. Rev. D 72, 065024 (2005).
- E. J. Copeland, A. R. Liddle, and D. Wands, Phys. Rev. D 57, 4686 (1998).
- L. Amendola, Phys. Rev. D 62, 043511 (2000).
- L. Amendola and D. Tocchini-Valentini, Phys. Rev. D 64, 043509 (2001).
- P. G. Ferreira and M. Joyce, Phys. Rev. D 58, 023503 (1998).
- R. Bean, S. H. Hansen, and A. Melchiorri, Phys. Rev. D 64, 103508 (2001).
- V. Barger, D. Marfatia, and K. Whisnant, Phys. Rev. D 73, 013005 (2006).
- M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, P. C. de Holanda, and R. Z. Funchal, Phys. Rev. D 73, 033008 (2006).
- Y. Fukuda et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1158 (1998).
- Y. Ashi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 101801 (2004).
- E. Aliu et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 081802 (2005).
- R. Kallosh, A. Linde, S. Prokushkin, and M. Shmakova, Phys. Rev. D 66, 123503 (2002).
- J. Weller and A. Albrecht, Phys. Rev. D 65, 103512 (2002).
- D. Tocchini-Valentini and L. Amendola, Phys. Rev. D 65, 063508 (2002).
- R. Bean and O. Doré, Phys. Rev. D 69, 083503 (2004).
- E. J. Copeland, A. R. Liddle, and D. Wands, Phys. Rev. D 57, 4686 (1998).
- M. Pietroni, Phys. Rev. D 72, 043535 (2005).
- Ph. Brax, C. van de Bruck, A.-C. Davis, and C. S. Rhodes, Phys. Rev. D 67, 023512 (2003).
- C. S. Rhodes, C. van de Bruck, Ph. Brax, and A.-C. Davis, Phys. Rev. D 68, 083511 (2003).
- P. J. Steinhardt, L.-M. Wang, and I. Zlatev, Phys. Rev. D 59, 123504 (1999).
- P. Binetruy, Phys. Rev. D 60, 063502 (1999).
- A. Lewis and S. Bridle, Phys. Rev. D 66, 103511 (2002).
- O. Elgaroy et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 061301 (2002).
CITING ARTICLES
For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.
|
A new free weekly publication from APS
|