You are not logged in to this journal. Log in
| Subscription Information
Phys. Rev. D 73, 103511 (2006) [7 pages]Evolving Newton's constant, extended gravity theories, and SnIa data analysis
Received 3 February 2006; published 19 May 2006
If Newton's constant G evolves on cosmological timescales as predicted by extended gravity theories then Type Ia supernovae (SnIa) cannot be treated as standard candles. The magnitude-redshift datasets however can still be useful. They can be used to simultaneously fit for both H(z) and G(z) (so that local G(z) constraints are also satisfied) in the context of appropriate parametrizations. Here we demonstrate how this analysis can be done by applying it to the Gold SnIa dataset. We compare the derived effective equation of state parameter w(z) at best fit with the corresponding result obtained by neglecting the evolution G(z). We show that even though the results clearly differ from each other, in both cases the best fit w(z) crosses the phantom divide w=-1. We then attempt to reconstruct a scalar-tensor theory that predicts the derived best fit forms of H(z) and G(z). Since the best fit G(z) fixes the scalar-tensor potential evolution F(z), there is no ambiguity in the reconstruction and the potential U(z) can be derived uniquely. The particular reconstructed scalar-tensor theory, however, involves a change of sign of the kinetic term Phi[prime](z)2 as in the minimally coupled case. ©2006 The American Physical Society
REFERENCES (45)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
P. G. Ferreira and M. Joyce, Phys. Rev. D 58, 023503 (1998); P. Brax and J. Martin, Phys. Rev. D 61, 103502 (2000); D. Wands, E. J. Copeland, and A. R. Liddle, Phys. Rev. D 57, 4686 (1998); A. R. Liddle and R. J. Scherrer, Phys. Rev. D 59, 023509 (1999); R. R. Caldwell, R. Dave, and P. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1582 (1998); I. Zlatev, L. Wang, and P. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 896 (1999); S. Dodelson, M. Kaplinghat, and E. Stewart, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5276 (2000); V. B. Johri, Phys. Rev. D 63, 103504 (2001); V. Sahni and L. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 62, 103517 (2000); C. Deffayet, G. Dvali, and G. Gabadadze, Phys. Rev. D 65, 044023 (2002); J. S. Alcaniz, Phys. Rev. D 65, 123514 (2002); E. V. Linder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 091301 (2003); L. Perivolaropoulos, Phys. Rev. D 67, 123516 (2003); D. F.Torres, Phys. Rev. D 66, 043522 (2002); E. Elizalde, S. Nojiri, and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Rev. D 70, 043539 (2004); J. A. S. Lima, J. V. Cunha, and J. S. Alcaniz, Phys. Rev. D 68, 023510 (2003); A. Upadhye, M. Ishak, and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. D 72, 063501 (2005); D. A. Dicus and W. W. Repko, Phys. Rev. D 70, 083527 (2004). U. Alam and V. Sahni, Phys. Rev. D 73, 084024 (2006); CITING ARTICLESFor access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.
|
Article Tools
|
|||||||||